Advertisement

From Sustainability to Integrated Reporting: How the IIRC Framework Affected Disclosures by a Financial Institution in Australia

  • Federica Casonato
  • Federica Farneti
  • John Dumay
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

This research explores the evolution of reporting in a financial institution and examines whether implementing the Integrated Reporting <IR> Framework enhanced the quality of those disclosures. Research goals are explored through a case study on the sustainability reporting and <IR> practices of CBD, a financial services company based in Australia, and its journey of disclosure. The analysis suggests that the approach proposed by the IIRC does not support disclosure but rather legitimises a company’s activities for the purposes of restoring its reputation. The ‘accountingisation’ of the process makes information more comparable from a financial point of view, but not necessarily from a social or environmental standpoint. We argue that the concept of materiality, highlighted in the IIRC’s Framework, has shifted its focus from stakeholders to shareholders. By aligning its reporting practices with emerging reporting trends guided by the IIRC, this financial institution participated in the evolution of <IR> and ultimately legitimised its operations with shareholders. The research shows that CBD has reached the last stage of a process highlighted in previous studies: definitive acceptance of, and compliance with, a new set of accounting rules that shifts focus from stakeholders to shareholders with the aim of standardising reporting output. Possible future changes in the evolution of the <IR> Framework might influence a company’s approach to reporting.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Federica Casonato, would like to express the deepest appreciation to Macquarie University that accepted her as a visiting student to conduct her research in Sydney, Australia and to all the staff members who contributed directly or indirectly to this book chapter. She would like to acknowledge the assistance of Professor John Dumay who offered her valuable suggestions for this study and provided her with relevant advice. She wishes to express her gratitude to her supervisor at the University of Bologna, Professor Federica Farneti, who supported her during all relevant stages of work and gave her the opportunity to get involved in the research.

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(1), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, C., Dumay, J., & Frost, G. (2017). In pursuit of a ‘Single Source of Truth’: From threatened legitimacy to integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CBD01. (2004). Corporate social responsibility report. Melbourne. Available at https://www.CBD.com.au/content/dam/CBDrwd/documents/reports/corporate/2004-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
  4. CBD02. (2011). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/download-centre
  5. CBD03. (2005). Corporate social responsibility report. Melbourne. Available at https://www.CBD.com.au/content/dam/CBDrwd/documents/reports/corporate/2005-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
  6. CBD04. (2009). Annual corporate responsibility review. Melbourne. Available at https://www.CBD.com.au/content/dam/CBDrwd/documents/reports/corporate/2009-corporate-responsibilityreview.Pdf
  7. CBD05. (2010). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/download-centre
  8. CBD06. (2012). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/download-centre
  9. CBD07. (2013). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/download-centre
  10. CBD08. (2014). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/download-centre
  11. CBD10. (2015). Integrated reporting. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/how-we-work/integrated-reporting
  12. CBD11. (2016). Annual review. Melbourne. Available at http://cr.CBD.com.au/how-we-work/integrated-reporting
  13. de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dumay, J., & Dai, T. (2017). Integrated thinking as a cultural control? Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 574–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2012). IC and strategy as practice. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 3(4), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumay, J., Frost, G., & Beck, C. (2015). Material legitimacy: Blending organisational and stakeholder concerns through non-financial information disclosures. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(1), 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(2016), 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Feng, T., Cummings, L., & Tweedie, D. (2017). Exploring integrated thinking in integrated reporting – An exploratory study in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 330–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., & Love, T. (2014). Walking the talk(s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1090–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2011). Towards integrated reporting: Communicating value in the 21st century. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  24. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2012). Integrated reporting prototype framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  25. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International <IR> Framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence, A., & Weber, J. (2014). Chapter 3. In business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  27. Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. (2007). Chapter 3: Action, personnel and cultural controls (pp. 76–94). London: Management Control Systems.Google Scholar
  28. Montecalvo, M., Farneti, F., & de Villiers, C. (2018). The potential of integrated reporting to enhance sustainability reporting in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 38(5), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federica Casonato
    • 1
  • Federica Farneti
    • 2
  • John Dumay
    • 3
  1. 1.Ernst & YoungMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Business LawUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations