Advertisement

The Science Behind Behaviour

Why Evidence-Based Theories and Models Are Useful
  • Helena Rubinstein
Chapter
First Online:
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter describes how theories and models of behaviour provide focus, help to cut through complexity and guide decisions about what products, services and interventions to design and develop. Rubinstein argues that too many businesses focus on changing attitudes and beliefs rather than on the behaviours themselves and that without a good theory or model of behaviour, companies do not know what activities to observe, or what is really important in influencing behaviour. She defines what makes a good theory or model of behaviour and how to use and develop models to understand specific challenges. She uses the COM-B and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to illustrate how theories benefit decision-making and how they can be used in practice.

Keywords

Acceptance and Use of Technology Model Attitudes Behavioural theory COM-B 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Conner, M. (2015). Extending not retiring the theory of planned behaviour: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9(2), 141–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.899060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Connor, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darnton, A. (2008). An overview of behaviour change models and their uses (Government social research: Behaviour change knowledge review). Westminster: Centre for Sustainable Development, University of Westminster.Google Scholar
  5. DiClemente, C. C., & Prochaska, J. O. (1982). Transtheretical Theory: Towards a more integrative theory of change. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 19(3), 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duhigg, C. (2013). The power of habit: Why we do what we do, and how to change. Random House Books.Google Scholar
  7. Eltayeb, M., & Dawson, M. (2016). Understanding user’s acceptance of personal cloud computing: Using the technology acceptance model. In Information technology: New generations (pp. 3–12). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32467-8_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fishbein, M. (1979). Theory of reasoned action. Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 65–116.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, J., Fisher, W., Williams, S., & Malloy, T. (1994). Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students (Vol. 13).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.13.3.238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagnon, M. P., Orruño, E., Asua, J., Abdeljelil, A. B., & Emparanza, J. (2012). Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals’ adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 18(1), 54–59.  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0066CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude–behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its application to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogg, M. A., & Vaughn, G. M. (2005). Social psychology (4th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Holley, C. (2012). Categorising behavioural characteristics (HelpDesk Report). DFID. Retrieved from http://www.heart-resources.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Categorising-Behaviourial-Characteristics-February-2012.pdf
  15. Jan, A. U., & Contreras, V. (2011). Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 845–851.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014a). The behaviour change wheel: A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Michie, S., Campbell, R., Brown, R., West, R., & Gainforth, H. (2014b). The ABC of behaviour change theories (1st ed.). London: Silverback Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations (1st ed.). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  20. Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (2009). Modern Psychometrics: The Science of Psychological Acceptance (3rd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.869710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. St Quinton, T. (2016). Planned behaviour—Stagnation or evolution? The Psychologist, 29, 924–927.Google Scholar
  23. Truong, Y. (2009). An evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in consumer acceptance of online video and television services. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 12(2), 177–186.Google Scholar
  24. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.  https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Rubinstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Innovia Technology LtdCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options