Advertisement

Smart City Transportation Services, Customer Satisfaction and Impact on the Quality of Life

  • Aleksandar AleksicEmail author
  • Nikolina Ljepava
  • Marija Ristic
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Growing demand for enhanced features of urban living conditions influenced an outburst of Smart Cities all over the world. A Smart City adopts application of wide range of information and communication technologies and citizen-centric solutions with the goal of providing sustainable economic development and an increased quality of life. The increased quality of life is also found to be closely related with an increased customer satisfaction and overall well-being of the citizens residing in the Smart City. Although Smart City features and services may be analyzed from the perspectives of human, technology, and institutional factors, an issue of improving the quality of life may be designated as one of the most important topic in the area. The current study provides a comparative analysis of the impact of various Smart City services on the quality of life. The base for proposed Smart City services has been derived from the wide range of references ([8]; standard ISO 37120:2014; [7]). The study findings indicate that Smart Cities should continuously assess the performance of services in order to identify the ones that have the major impact on quality of life. The future research could explore in more details the relationships between Smart City services, quality of life and overall citizen satisfaction.

Keywords

Smart city Customer satisfaction Key performance indicators 

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, M.: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 630–632 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, M.D., Gustafsson, A.: Improving Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty and Profit: an Integrated Measurement and Management System. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boschmann, E., Kwan, M.: Toward socially sustainable urban transportation: progress and potentials. J. Transp. Geogr. 2(3), 138–157 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fischer, J.M., Amekudzi, A.: Quality of life, sustainable civil infrastructure and sustainable development: strategically expanding choice. J. Urban Plann. Develop. 137(1), 29–38. American Society of Civil Engineers (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, J.M., Mshadoni, M., Kennedy, A.A.: Why and how to use customer opinions: a quality-of-life and customer satisfaction-oriented foundation for performance-based decision-making. Transp. Rev. Transnational Transdisciplinary J. 34(1), 86–101 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pham, T., Ahammad, M.: Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: a holistic process perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.003 (2017)
  7. 7.
    Nam, T., Pardo, T.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, vol. 11, 12–15 June, College Park, MD, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A., Mangano, G., Scorrano, F.: Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities 38, 25–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirpalani, V.H.: International marketing and the quality-of-life. In: Samli, A.C. (ed.) Marketing and Quality-of-life Interface, pp. 204–219. Quorum Books, New York, NY (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choi, W., Rho, M.J., Park, J., Kim, K.-J., Kwon, Y.D., Choi, I.Y.: Information system success model for customer relationship management system in health promotion centers. Health Care Inf. Res. 19(2), 110–120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliver, R.L., Swan, J.E.: Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction. J. Consum. Res. 16, 372–383 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollands, R.G.: Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vijaykumara, S.G., Saravanakumar, M., Balamurugan, M.: Unique sense: smart computing prototype. Procedia Comput. Sci. 50, 223–228 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giffinger, R., Gudrun, H.: Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of cities? ACE: Architect. City Environ. 4(12), 7–25 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K.: Knowledge-based urban development: the local economic development path of Brisbane, Australia. Local Econ. 23(3), 195–207 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parahoo, S., Harvey, H., Radi, G.: Satisfaction of tourists with public transport: an empirical investigation in Dubai. J. Travel Tourism Mark. 31, 1004–1017 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R.A., Hayes, N.M., Nelson, L.E.: Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives: defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc. Available at http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf (2010)
  18. 18.
    Woold-Dauphinee, S.: Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going? J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52(4), 355–363 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandar Aleksic
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nikolina Ljepava
    • 2
  • Marija Ristic
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia
  2. 2.American University in the EmiratesDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations