Advertisement

Rupture Dynamics and Seismic Radiation on Multi-scale Geometrically Complex Faults

  • P. Martin MaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Geological faults comprise large-scale segmentation and small-scale roughness that govern earthquake processes and associated seismic radiation. Recent large earthquakes demonstrate that standard techniques for seismic hazard assessment for such faults (fault systems) are insufficient. This problem can be overcome by numerical simulations for multi-scale geometrical complex faults to investigate their rupture dynamics and seismic radiation. In this review, I discuss recent work to understand effects of large-scale segmentation and small-scale roughness on rupture evolution and near-source shaking. Using numerical simulations, we find that rupture incoherence due to fault roughness leads to high-frequency spectral decay consistent with observations. Waveform characteristics and comparisons with empirical ground-motion relations show that rough-fault rupture simulations generate realistic synthetic seismogram that can be used for engineering applications. We also show that for segmented faults, the spatial distribution of the regional stress is of critical importance as it determines the initial stress on the fault system. Similarly, the rupture nucleation point has significant impact on the resulting rupture process and earthquake size. Consequently, seismic hazard assessment for such fault systems must include more earthquake physics to capture the possible near-source shaking levels of future earthquakes.

Keywords

Earthquake physics Geometric fault complexity Rupture dynamics Seismic shaking Seismic hazard analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Ely, G.P., Day, S.M., Minster, J.-B.: A support-operator method for visco-elastic wave modeling in 3-D heterogeneous media. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 331–344 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ely, G.P., Day, S.M., Minster, J.-B.: A support-operator method for 3-D rupture dynamics. Geophys. J. Int. 177, 1140–1150 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mai, P.M., Galis, M., Thingbaijam, K., Vyas, J., Dunham, E.: Accounting for fault roughness in pseudo-dynamic ground-motion simulations. Pure Appl. Geophys. (2017). Published online April 03, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1536-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oglesby, D.D., Mai, P.M.: Fault Geometry, rupture dynamics, and ground motion from potential earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault Zone under the Sea of Marmara. Geophys. J. Int. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05289.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oglesby, D.D.: Earthquake dynamics on dip-slip faults. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oglesby, D.D, Mai, P.M., Atakan, K., Pucci, S.: Dynamic models of earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault under the Sea of Marmara: the effect of hypocenter location. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18302 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl035037
  7. 7.
    Passone, L., Mai, P.M.: Kinematic earthquake ground-motion simulations on listric normal faults. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. (2017). Published online October 2017,  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.-A., Mai, P.M.: An integrated dynamic rupture model for the 1992 Landers earthquake. In revision for J. Geophys. Res. (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Physical Science and EngineeringKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations