Advertisement

Model-Based Systems Engineering and Through-Life Information Management in Complex Construction

  • Yu Chen
  • Julie Jupp
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

With increasing maturity in model-based design and construction, a concomitant increase in the need for system-based methodologies and toolsets to support systems integration, requirements management, verification and validation and configuration management is evident if model-based information is to serve the operations of complex buildings and civil infrastructure projects. There is much to learn from best practices reported in complex discrete manufacturing. In particular, closed-loop product lifecycle management (PLM), systems engineering (SE) and model-based systems engineering (MBSE) are key to systems approaches to digital complex construction delivery and the reuse of model-based information for operations and maintenance (O&M). The paper reviews related research and investigates the role of the V-model in the development process, discussing its significance to structuring a through-life approach to information management. A discussion of Erasmus’ PLM aligned V-model is presented, and missing links in current BIM-enabled environments are identified relative to requirements engineering, verification and validation, and configuration management. The paper closes with a discussion of the gaps in supporting model-based tool ecologies and lack of a central structuring infrastructure, as well as the deficiencies in current process and data standards. Closing with the identification of a future research agenda.

Keywords

Building Information Modelling Through-life information management Systems engineering Model-based systems engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Hoeber, H., Alsem, D.: Life-cycle information management using open-standard BIM. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 23, 696–708 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green, S.D., Newcombe, R., Fernie, S., Weller, S.: Learning across business sectors: Knowledge sharing between aerospace and construction. The University of Reading, Reading (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whyte, J.K., Hartmann, T.: How digitizing building information transforms the built environment. Build. Res. Inf. 45, 591–595 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1324726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eastman, C., Eastman, C.M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barlish, K., Sullivan, K.: How to measure the benefits of BIM — a case study approach. Autom. Constr. 24, 149–159 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Love, P.E.D., Matthews, J., Simpson, I., Hill, A., Olatunji, O.A.: A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Autom. Constr. 37, 1–10 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jupp, J., Awad, R.: BIM-FM and information requirements management: missing links in the AEC and FM interface. In: Ríos, J., Bernard, A., Bouras, A., Foufou, S. (eds.) PLM 2017. IAICT, vol. 517, pp. 311–323. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72905-3_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, A., Marsters, A., Dossick, C.S., Neff, G.: Construction to operations exchange: challenges of implementing COBie and BIM in a large owner organization, pp. 688–697 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jupp, J.R.: Cross industry learning: a comparative study of product lifecycle management and building information modelling. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 9, 258–284 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boton, C., Rivest, L., Forgues, D., Jupp, J.: Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 443–453. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blockley, D.I., Godfrey, P.: Doing it Differently: Systems for Rethinking Construction. Thomas Telford, London (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aslaksen, E.W., et al.: Guide for the application of systems engineering in large infrastructure projects. INCOSE Infrastructure Working Group San Diego (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    INCOSE: Systems Engineering Handbook. A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, v.3. INCOSE, Seattle (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whyte, J.: The future of systems integration within civil infrastructure: a review and directions for research. INCOSE Int. Symp. Banner 26, 1541–1555 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00244.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sage, A.P., Rouse, W.B.: Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lindkvist, C., Stasis, A., Whyte, J.: Configuration management in complex engineering projects. Procedia CIRP 11, 173–176 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris, P.W.: The Management of Projects. Thomas Telford, London (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whyte, J., Stasis, A., Lindkvist, C.: Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: configuration management, asset information and ‘big data’. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 339–351 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu, X., Ma, L., Ding, L.: A framework for BIM-enabled life-cycle information management of construction project. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 11, 126 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.5772/58445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zadeh, P.A., Wang, G., Cavka, H.B., Staub-French, S., Pottinger, R.: Information quality assessment for facility management. Adv. Eng. Inform. 33, 181–205 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hedberg, T., Feeney, A.B., Helu, M., Camelio, J.A.: Toward a lifecycle information framework and technology in manufacturing. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 17, 021010 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lemberger, I.D., Erasmus, L.D.: Systems engineering management process maturity of South African manufacturing organisations. In: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET), pp. 2371–2380. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ameri, F., Dutta, D.: Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2, 577–590 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jupp, J.R., Nepal, M.: BIM and PLM: comparing and learning from changes to professional practice across sectors. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45937-9_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boton, C., Rivest, L., Forgues, D., Jupp, J.R.: Comparison of shipbuilding and construction industries from the product structure standpoint. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 11, 191–220 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLM.2018.094714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matar, M., Osman, H., Georgy, M., Abou-Zeid, A., El-Said, M.: A systems engineering approach for realizing sustainability in infrastructure projects. HBRC J. 13, 190–201 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    (Robin) de Graaf, R.S., (Rick) Vromen, R.M., (Hans) Boes, J.: Applying systems engineering in the civil engineering industry: an analysis of systems engineering projects of a Dutch water board. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 34, 144–161 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2017.1362399
  28. 28.
    INCOSE T: Systems Engineering Vision 2020. INCOSE-TP-2004-004-02 (2007). http://www.ccose.org/media/upload/SEVision2020_20071003_v2_03.pdf
  29. 29.
    Eigner, M., Dickopf, T., Apostolov, H., Schaefer, P., Faißt, K.-G., Keßler, A.: System lifecycle management: initial approach for a sustainable product development process based on methods of model based systems engineering. In: Fukuda, S., Bernard, A., Gurumoorthy, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2014. IAICT, vol. 442, pp. 287–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45937-9_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    FHWA: Systems Engineering for Intelligent Transportation Systems (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Locatelli, G., Mancini, M., Romano, E.: Systems engineering to improve the governance in complex project environments. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32, 1395–1410 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Erasmus, J., Jacob, M., Erasmus, L.D.: The need for PLM in South Africa (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    RIBA Project stages. Imperial College London. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/admin-services/estates-projects/project-procedures/stages/. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
  34. 34.
    Product|dRofus. http://www.drofus.no/en/product.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  35. 35.
    Sabol, L.: Challenges in cost estimating with Building Information Modeling. IFMA World Workplace, pp. 1–16 (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    East, W.E., Brodt, W.: BIM for construction handover. J. Build. Inf. Model. 2007, 28–35 (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pärn, E.A., Edwards, D.J., Sing, M.C.P.: The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: a review. Autom. Constr. 75, 45–55 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Home – Project Haystack. https://project-haystack.org/. Accessed 17 Mar 2018
  39. 39.
    BSI. PAS 1192-3:2014 Specification for information management for the operational phase of assets using building information modelling. The British Standards Institution (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    BSI. PAS 1192-2:2013 Specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling. The British Standards Institution (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    ISO: ISO/DIS 19650 Organization of information about construction works - Information management using building information modelling, Draft (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Built EnvironmentUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations