An Integrated Tool for the Optimization and Simulation of Hybrid Product-Process Layouts

  • Gianluca D’AntonioEmail author
  • Paolo Chiabert
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)


The design of a manufacturing process is a crucial phase for ensuring a profitable production. In particular, an appropriate layout for the facilities must be identified to minimize the impact of transporting manufacturing units throughout the shop-floor on both process performance and production cost. In a former work, a mathematical model capable to define process, product and hybrid layouts has been defined by minimizing the average distance travelled by each manufacturing unit. The present paper aims to present an integrated tool able to: (i) deploy the optimization model to autonomously evaluate the optimal layout proposal that fits with a set of input provided by the designer; (ii) evaluate a set of KPIs to assess the layout; (iii) compile a discrete event simulation model on FlexSim to enable the designer to evaluate layout performance in a multiplicity of operating scenarios.


Facility layout problem Facilities planning and design Optimal facility layout Hybrid facility Discrete event simulation 



The research presented in this paper has been developed in partnership with COMAU S.p.A. and with Centro Ricerche Fiat. The research has been funded by Centro Ricerche Fiat within the project FlexAGV: Exploitation of flexibility in smart manufacturing systems, with the support of eng. J. Mascolo (CRF) and Andrea Ascheri (COMAU).


  1. 1.
    Drira, A., Pierreval, H., Hajri-Gabouj, S.: Facility layout problems: a survey. Annu. Rev. Control 31(2), 255–267 (2007). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tompkins, J., White, J., Bozer, Y., Tanchoco, J.: Facilities Planning. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heragu, S.S.: Facilities Design, 4th edn. CRC Press, Clermont (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armour, G.C., Buffa, E.S.: A heuristic algorithm and simulation approach to relative location of facilities. Manag. Sci. 9(2), 294–309 (1963). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shayan, E., Chittilappilly, A.: Genetic algorithm for facilities layout problems based on slicing tree structure. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42(19), 4055–4067 (2004). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anjos, M.F., Vieira, M.V.: Mathematical optimization approaches for facility layout problems: the state-of-the-art and future research directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261(1), 1–16 (2017). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassan, M.M.D.: Machine layout problem in modern manufacturing facilities. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32(11), 2559–2584 (1994). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kusiak, A., Heragu, S.S.: The facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 29(3), 229–251 (1987). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meller, R.D., Gau, K.-Y.: The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J. Manuf. Syst. 15(5), 351–366 (1996). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh, S.P., Sharma, R.R.K.: A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 30(5), 425–433 (2006). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benjaafar, S., Sheikhzadeh, M.: Design of flexible plant layouts. IIE Trans. 32, 309–322 (2000). Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kouvelis, P., Kim, M.W.: Unidirectional loop network layout problem in automated manufacturing systems. Oper. Res. 40(3), 533–550 (1992). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xie, W., Sahinidis, N.V.: A branch-and-bound algorithm for the continuous facility layout problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 32(4), 1016–1028 (2008). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Montreuil, B.: A modelling framework for integrating layout design and flow network design. In: Progress in Material Handling and Logistics, vol. 2, pp. 95–115. Springer, Berlin (1991).
  15. 15.
    Meller, R.D., Narayanan, V., Vance, P.H.: Optimal facility layout design. Oper. Res. Lett. 23(3), 117–127 (1998). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sherali, H.D., Fraticelli, B.M.P., Meller, R.D.: Enhanced model formulations for optimal facility layout. Oper. Res. 51(4), 629–644 (2003). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bukchin, Y., Tzur, M.: A new MILP approach for the facility process-layout design problem with rectangular and L/T shape departments. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(24), 7339–7359 (2014). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mak, K., Wong, Y., Chan, F.: A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 11(1), 113–127 (1998). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azadivar, F., Wang, J.: Facility layout optimization using simulation and genetic algorithms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(17), 4369–4383 (2000). Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunker, T., Radons, G., Westkämper, E.: A coevolutionary algorithm for a facility layout problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(15), 3479–3500 (2003). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galaxe-Paes, F., Alves-Pessoa, A., Vidal, T.: A hybrid genetic algorithm with decomposition phases for the unequal area facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 256(3), 742–756 (2017). Scholar
  22. 22.
    Komarudin, K.Y.W.: Applying ant system for solving unequal area facility layout problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(3), 730–746 (2010). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niroomand, S., Hadi-Vencheh, A., Shahanaghi, R., Vizvári, B.: Modified migrating birds optimization algorithm for closed loop layout with exact distances in flexible manufacturing systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(19), 6586–6597 (2015). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sikaroudi, A.M.E., Shahanaghi, K.: Facility layout by collision detection and force exertion heuristics. J. Manuf. Syst. 41, 21–30 (2016). Scholar
  25. 25.
    D’Antonio, G., Saja, A., Ascheri, A., Mascolo, J., Chiabert, P.: An integrated mathematical model for the optimization of hybrid product-process layouts. J. Manuf. Syst. 46, 179–192 (2018). Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations