Advertisement

TEAM: A Tool for Eco Additive Manufacturing to Optimize Environmental Impact in Early Design Stages

  • Laverne Floriane
  • Bottacini Enrico
  • Segonds Frédéric
  • Perry Nicolas
  • D’Antonio Gianluca
  • Chiabert Paolo
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Nowadays, the environmental impact of a product is a major factor for the design team and for the end customer. To decrease the environmental impact of a product during its whole lifecycle, many design methods are available focusing on the multitude of data from the product once it is fully designed (Lifecycle Analysis etc.). However, the design choices made in the early design stages have a crucial importance on the environmental impact of the chosen solution. It is therefore necessary to propose to the multidisciplinary design team a tool to help them choosing the best concept and the best way to produce it as early as possible. The emphasis in this paper is on Additive Manufacturing technologies, which are widely used in concept development. A design tool prototype is presented and evaluated in order to foster early eco-additive manufacturing of concepts.

Keywords

Additive Manufacturing Sustainability Early design stages 

References

  1. Bakker, C.A.: Environmental Information for Industrial Designers (1995). http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:35b9dbef-3718-40fc-b64a-178b1cd0fed8
  2. da Silva Barros, K., Zwolinski, P.: Influence of the use/user profile in the LCA of 3d printed products. Procedia CIRP 50, 318–323 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coghlan, D., Brannick, T.: Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, London (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Despeisse, M., Ford, S.: The role of additive manufacturing in improving resource efficiency and sustainability. Paper presented at the Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management Towards Sustainable Growth, Tokyo, Japan (2015)Google Scholar
  5. F2792-12a, ASTM: Standard terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.R., Stucker, B.: Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ISO: ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, p. 20 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. ISO: ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 Additive manufacturing – General principles – Terminology, p. 19 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. Laverne, F., Segonds, F., Anwer, N., Le Coq, M.: Assembly-based methods to support product innovation in design for additive manufacturing: an exploratory case study. ASME J. Mech. Des. 137(12), 121701–121708 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laverne, F., Segonds, F., D’Antonio, G., Le Coq, M.: Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 11(2), 279–288 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0314-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mani, M., Lyons, K.W., Gupta, S.K.: Sustainability characterization for additive manufacturing. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119, 419–428 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manzini, E.: Strategic design for sustainability: towards a new mix of products and services. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan (1999)Google Scholar
  13. Mejía, R., López, A., Molina, A.: Experiences in developing collaborative engineering environments: an action research approach. Comput. Ind. 58(4), 329–346 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellor, S., Hao, L., Zhang, D.: Additive manufacturing: a framework for implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149, 194–201 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering, 362nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Scalabre, O.: Embracing Industry 4.0 and Rediscovering Growth (2018). https://www.bcg.com/capabilities/operations/embracing-industry-4.0-rediscovering-growth.aspx
  17. Segonds, F., Cohen, G., Véron, P., Peyceré, J.: PLM and early stages collaboration in interactive design, a case study in the glass industry. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 10(2), 10 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0217-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stock, T., Seliger, G.: Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40, 536–541 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wohlers, T.T.: Wohlers Report 2014: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry Annual Worldwide Progress Report (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laverne Floriane
    • 1
  • Bottacini Enrico
    • 2
  • Segonds Frédéric
    • 1
  • Perry Nicolas
    • 3
  • D’Antonio Gianluca
    • 2
  • Chiabert Paolo
    • 2
  1. 1.LCPI, ENSAM ParisParisFrance
  2. 2.DIGEP, Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  3. 3.I2M, ENSAM Bordeaux, Esplanade des Arts & MétiersTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations