Advertisement

How to Manage People Underutilization in an Industry 4.0 Environment?

  • Gianluca D’Antonio
  • Paolo Chiabert
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

For long time, Lean manufacturing has been often mis-defined as “doing more with less” and relied on Taiichi Ohno’s taxonomy made of seven classes of wastes. More recently, the definition of Lean Manufacturing has been mostly centered on the continuous improvement approach and an eighth class of waste has been defined: skills, or non-utilized talent. This kind of waste occurs when organizations introduce a huge separation between the management and the process operators, thus obstructing the continuous improvement routines. The spread of the Industry 4.0 paradigm, based on a massive ICT deployment, may lead to two possible risks. First, decisions may be taken based only on the data acquired on the process, without involving the people performing a task who are most capable and experienced to develop appropriate solutions. This would lead to enlarge the gap between management and operators and, in turn, the waste of skills. On the other side, appropriate skills are necessary to manage the Industry 4.0 tools. The latest literature advances in these two fields are discussed in the present paper.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The results presented in this paper has been developed within the research program DISLOMAN - Dynamic Integrated ShopfLoor Operation MANagement for Industry 4.0, funded by Regione Piemonte (Italy).

References

  1. 1.
    Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., Roos, D.: The Machine that Changed the World. Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A.: The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 114, 254–280 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowles, J.: The computerisation of European jobs (2015). http://bruegel.org/2014/07/the-computerisation-of-european-jobs/
  4. 4.
    Ohno, T.: Toyota Production System - Beyond Large Scale Production. Productivity Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdul Wahab, A.N., Mukhtara, M., Sulaiman, R.: A conceptual model of lean manufacturing dimensions. Procedia Technol. 11, 1292–1298 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cattaneo, L., Rossi, M., Negri, E., Powell, D., Terzi, S.: Lean thinking in the digital era. In: Ríos, J., Bernard, A., Bouras, A., Foufou, S. (eds.) PLM 2017. IAICT, vol. 517, pp. 371–381. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72905-3_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Armstrong, M., Taylor, S.: Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 13th edn. Kogan Page, London (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hecklau, F., Galeitzkea, M., Flachsa, S., Kohlb, H.: Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 54, 1–6 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ras, E., Wild, F., Stahl, C., Baudet, A.: Bridging the skills gap of workers in Industry 4.0 by Human performance augmentation tools - challenges and roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA 2017), pp. 428–432 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    BDI (The Federation of German Industries), Roland Berger: The digital transformation of industry. How important is it? Who are the winners? What must be done now? (2013). https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_digital_transformation_of_industry_20150315.pdf
  11. 11.
    Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A.: Smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput. Ind. Eng. 113, 144–159 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerpen, D., Löhrer, M., Saggiomo, M., Kemper, M., Lemm, J., Gloy, Y.-S.: Effects of cyber-physical production systems on human factors in a weaving mill: implementation of digital working environments based on augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pp. 2094–2098 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icit.2016.7475092
  13. 13.
    Krugh, M., Mears, L.: A complementary Cyber-Human Systems framework for Industry 4.0 Cyber-Physical Systems. Manuf. Lett. (2018, in press).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.003
  14. 14.
    Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.-A.: A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3, 18–23 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arndt, A., Auth, C., Anderl, R.: Guideline for the implementation of human-oriented assistance systems in smart factories. In: Trzcielinski, S. (ed.) Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future. AISC, vol. 606, pp. 85–96. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60474-9_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fornalczyk, A., Stompor-Swiderska, J., Slazyk-Sobol, M.: Age management within organizations-employees’ perceptions of the phenomenon - research report. J. Intercult. Manag. 7(3), 39–51 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1515/joim-2015-0020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schinner, M., Calero Valdez, A., Noll, E., Schaar, A.K., Letmathe, P., Ziefle, M.: ‘Industrie 4.0’ and an aging workforce – a discussion from a psychological and a managerial perspective. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10298, pp. 537–556. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peruzzini, M., Pellicciari, M.: A framework to design a human-centred adaptive manufacturing system for aging workers. Adv. Eng. Inform. 33, 330–349 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorecky, D., Khamis, M., Mura, K.: Introduction and establishment of virtual training in the factory of the future. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(1), 182–190 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pfeiffer, S.: Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies 6(2), paper no. 16.  https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016
  21. 21.
    Romero, D., et al.: Towards an Operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering (CIE46) (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu1, H., Li, Y.: Management approaches for Industry 4.0 - a human resource management perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 5309–5316 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.2016.7748365
  23. 23.
    Pinzone, M., Fantini, P., Perini, S., Garavaglia, S., Taisch, M., Miragliotta, G.: Jobs and skills in Industry 4.0: an exploratory research. In: Lödding, H., Riedel, R., Thoben, K.-D., von Cieminski, G., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2017. IAICT, vol. 513, pp. 282–288. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piñol, T.C., Artigas Porta, S., Rodríguez Arévalo, M.C., Minguella-Canela, J.: Study of the training needs of industrial companies in the Barcelona area and proposal of training courses and methodologies to enhance further competitiveness. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1426–1431 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fantini, P., et al.: Exploring the integration of the human as a flexibility factor in CPS enabled manufacturing environments: methodology and results. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2016), pp. 5711–5716 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2016.7793579

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations