Advertisement

A Methodological Approach for the Identification of Context-Specific Reconfiguration Options in the PLM-Context

  • Philipp Savarino
  • Michael Abramovici
  • Jens Christian Göbel
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Current changes of traditional products towards intelligent, connected smart products require a fundamental adaption and enhancement of traditional Product Lifecycle Management approaches. In our previous activities we showed that lifecycle management approaches lack suitable methods and IT tools for smart products especially during their use phase. In particular the reconfiguration in the use phase has been addressed, as the characteristic properties of smart products enable a tremendous potential. As an approach virtual product twins were introduced in our previous activities in order to manage both virtual product models as well as product usage data across all engineering domains including environmental data. This contribution describes the core enabler, such as the reconfiguration lifecycle and virtual product twins for the reconfiguration of smart products during their use phase including the necessity of designing the architecture of reconfiguration options. The scope is the introduction of a methodological approach, which allows the identification of context-specific reconfiguration options.

Keywords

Reconfiguration Smart products Product Lifecycle Management Virtual twin 

References

  1. 1.
    Abramovici, M.: Smart Products. In: Lapierriére, L., Reinhart, G. (eds.) CIRP Encypclopedia of Production Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lutters, E., van Houten, F.J.A.M., Bernard, A., Mermoz, E., Schutte, C.S.L.: Tools and techniques for product design. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 63(2), 607–630 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DIN ISO 10007: Qualitätsmanagement. Leitfaden für Konfigurationsmanagement (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    NASA Technology Roadmap, Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap Technology Area 11 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEEE standard for configuration management in systems and software engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DIN EN 61499: International Electrotechnical Commission 61499-1: Function Block - Part 1 Architecture (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zoitl, A., Sunder, C., Terzic, I.: Dynamic reconfiguration of distributed control applications with reconfiguration services based on IEC 61499. In: IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications, DIS 2006, 15–16 June 2006, Prague, pp. 109–114. IEEE, Piscataway (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olsen, S., Wang, J., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Brennan, R.W.: Contingencies-based reconfiguration of distributed factory automation. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 21(4–5), 379–390 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abramovici, M., Göbel, J.C., Savarino, P.: Reconfiguration of smart products during their use phase based on virtual product twins. CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 66(1), 165–168 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oxford Dictionaries: Definition of context. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/context Accessed 5 Sept 2017
  11. 11.
    Hribernik, K.A., Rabe, L., Thoben, K.D., Schumacher, J.: The product avatar as a product-instance-centric information management concept. IJPLM 1(4), 367 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., Bettenhausen, K.D.: About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3), 567–572 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abramovici, M., Göbel, J.C., Savarino, P., Gebus, P.: Towards smart product lifecycle management with an integrated reconfiguration management. In: Ríos, J., Bernard, A., Bouras, A., Foufou, S. (eds.) PLM 2017. IAICT, vol. 517, pp. 489–498. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72905-3_43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Savarino
    • 1
  • Michael Abramovici
    • 1
  • Jens Christian Göbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Information Technology in Mechanical Engineering (ITM)Ruhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations