Advertisement

Environmental Factors on Concept Maps Design

  • Daniela Oliveira
  • Mickael Gardoni
  • Kimiz Dalkir
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) environments have a lot of potential to facilitate communication and support collective work, speeding construction times and increasing the overall quality of the project. A few ontologies creation efforts have been made by both academia and practitioners to foster the transmission of knowledge in BIM environments. This paper aims to add to the discussion by analyzing the notes of users of concept maps, knowledge structures similar to ontologies, and comparing them to BIM environment researchers’.

Keywords

BIM Concept maps Knowledge management Knowledge transmission Knowledge construction Ontologies 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Daniela’s work was supported by McGill University’s Centre for Social and Cultural Data Science (CSCDS) grant number J1317026.

References

  1. 1.
    Adesope, O.O., Nesbit, J.C.: A systematic review of research on collaborative learning with concept maps. In: Handbook of Research on Collaborative Learning Using Concept Mapping, pp. 238–255. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brilhante, V., Macedo, G., Macedo, S.: Heuristic transformation of well-constructed conceptual maps into owl preliminary domain ontologies. In: Workshop on Ontologies and their Applications, WONTO (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, R., Salem, D.A.: Concept mapping as a feminist research method. Psychol. Women Q. 23, 65–89 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castro, A.G., et al.: The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case. BMC Bioinform. 7, 267 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerovsek, T.: A review and outlook for a “Building Information Model” (BIM): a multi-standpoint framework for technological development. Adv. Eng. Inform. 25, 224–244 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ci, C., Choi, S.: How to manage a city’s image using the brand concept map and network analysis: a case of Seoul. Qual. Quant. 51, 2441–2456 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0402-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daley, A.: Reflections on reflexivity and critical reflection as critical research practices. Affillia 25, 68–82 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109909354981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalkir, K.: A Knowledge Management Approach for Digital Cultural Heritage Preservation, Istanbul (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dansereau, D.F.: Node-link mapping principles for visualizing knowledge and information. In: Tergan, S.-O., Keller, T. (eds.) Knowledge and Information Visualization. LNCS, vol. 3426, pp. 61–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11510154_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eastman, C.M., Jeong, Y.-S., Sacks, R., Kaner, I.: Exchange model and exchange object concepts for implementation of national BIM standards. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24, 25–34 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freeman, L.A.: The effects of concept maps on requirements elicitation and system models during information systems development. In: Cañas, A.J., Novak, J.D., González, F. (eds.) Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping. Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, pp. 257–264 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freeman, L.A., Jessup, L.M.: The power and benefits of concept mapping: measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 26, 151–169 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    González, H.L., Palencia, A.P., Umaña, L.A., Galindo, L., Villafrade, M.L.A.: Mediated learning experience and concept maps: a pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 32, 312–316 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00021.2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howard, R., Björk, B.-C.: Building information modelling – experts’ views on standardisation and industry deployment. Adv. Eng. Inform. 22, 271–280 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson, K.M., Trochim, W.M.K.: Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ. Res. Methods 5, 307–336 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1177/109442802237114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laakso, M., Kiviniemi, A.: The IFC standard - a review of history, development, and standardization. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. ITcon. 17, 134–161 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lambe, P.: Organising Knowledge: Taxonomies, Knowledge and Organisational Effectiveness. Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Ltd., Witney (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., Cross, D.R., Reynolds, S.B.: Multirelational semantic maps. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1, 331–367 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C.R., Tsou, A.: Team size matters: collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 1323–1332 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, J., Jeong, Y.: User-centric knowledge representations based on ontology for AEC design collaboration. Comput. Aided Des. 44, 735–748 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Linton, R.: Conceptualizing feminism: clarifying social science concepts. Eval. Program. Plann. 12, 25–29 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90018-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Y., Van Nederveen, S., Hertogh, M.: Understanding effects of BIM on collaborative design and construction: an empirical study in China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35, 686–698 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ridde, V.: “The problem of the worst-off is dealt with after all other issues”: the equity and health policy implementation gap in Burkina Faso. Soc. Sci. Med. 66, 1368–1378 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers, R.R.: Reflection in higher education: a concept analysis. Innov. High. Educ. 26, 37–57 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010986404527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rosas, S.R.: Multi-map comparison for group concept mapping: an approach for examining conceptual congruence through spatial correspondence. Qual. Quant. 51, 2421–2439 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0399-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosas, S.R., Camphausen, L.C.: The use of concept mapping for scale development and validation in evaluation. Eval. Program. Plann. 30, 125–135 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santos, R., Costa, A.A., Grilo, A.: Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Autom. Constr. 80, 118–136 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Starr, R.R., de Oliveira, J.M.P.: Concept maps as the first step in an ontology construction method. Inf. Syst. 38, 771–783 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Succar, B.: Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 18, 357–375 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Trochim, W.M.: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval. Program. Plann. 12, 1–16 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trochim, W.M., Cook, J.A., Setze, R.J.: Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff’s views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 62, 766 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vincent, A., Ross, D.: Personalize training: determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences online. Learn. Organ. 8, 36–43 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470110366525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weinerth, K., Koenig, V., Brunner, M., Martin, R.: Concept maps: a useful and usable tool for computer-based knowledge assessment? A literature review with a focus on usability. Comput. Educ. 78, 201–209 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Windsor, L.C.: Using concept mapping in community-based participatory research: a mixed methods approach. J. Mix. Methods Res. 7, 274–293 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813479175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wix, J., Karlshoej, J.: Information delivery manual: guide to components and development methods. Build. Int. 5, 10 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yao, J., Gu, M.: Conceptology: using concept map for knowledge representation and ontology construction. J. Netw. 8, 1708–1712 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhao, X.: A scientometric review of global BIM research: analysis and visualization. Autom. Constr. 80, 37–47 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Petrucci, C.J., Quinlan, K.M.: Bridging the research-practice gap. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 34, 25–42 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v34n02_03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stoyanova, N., Kommers, P.: Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 13, 111 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Oliveira
    • 1
  • Mickael Gardoni
    • 1
  • Kimiz Dalkir
    • 2
  1. 1.École de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada
  2. 2.School of Information StudiesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations