Advertisement

Product Lifecycle Management Strategy for the Definition and Design Process of Face Implants Oriented to Specific Patients

  • Cristian C. Ardila-Mejia
  • Clara Isabel López-Gualdrón
  • Javier Mauricio Martínez-Gómez
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was oriented to generate a structured model from an organizational vision to the definition and development of precise osteosynthesis prosthesis. Implants were adapted to the Colombian population anthropometry allowing fracture reductions and craniofacial defects corrections based on technologies for specific patients. This research was developed taking into account the first three PLM stages: Imagination, definition, and realization. Procedures, stages, roles, and activities that take part in the design and pre-surgical planning were identified for the patient-specific implants PSI, carried out through a study case. It was established as a definition model for design and fabrication process of patient-specific implants (PSI). It was possible that technology included in a collaborative workflow wherein the roles which intervene in the design process and the pre-surgical planning were related. The ability to design implants for specific patients and surgical guides was obtained different pathology situations including face trauma. According to the PLM strategy for designing custom implant, it would be possible to build innovation capabilities. With those, an organization could generate a collaborative workflow integrating stages, roles, activities, applying technology and local human resource. Further work related to the subject is necessary to enhance the process by iteration and improve the clinical cases management.

Keywords

Collaborative workflow Digital manufacturing Patient-specific device PLM model Virtual surgical planning 

References

  1. 1.
    Hassfeld, S., Mühling, J.: Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery - a review and an assessment of technology. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 30(1), 2–13 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, J., et al.: Customized titanium mesh for repairing cranial defects: a method with comprehensive evaluation. J. Craniofac. Surg. 26(8), e758–e761 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García, A., Morey, M.Á., Ramos, M., Janeiro, S., Molina, I., Iriarte, J.I.: Reconstrucción de la articulación temporomandibular postraumática con prótesis a medida. Planificación quirúrgica virtual. Rev. Esp. Cir. Oral y Maxilofac. 33(2), 53–60 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    González de Santiago, M., Chaurand, L., Sandoval, B.: Cranial reconstruction with a custom-made implant. Rev. Esp. Cir. Oral Maxilofac. 3333(1), 40–44 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rengier, F., et al.: 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5(4), 335–341 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goh, B.T., Teoh, K.H.: Orbital implant placement using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) stereolithographic surgical template protocol. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 44(5), 642–648 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grieves, M.W., Tanniru, M.: PLM, process, practice and provenance: knowledge provenance in support of business practices in product lifecycle management. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 3(1), 37 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saaksvuori, A., Immonen, A.: Product Lifecycle Management, 3rd edn., Helsinki, Finland (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Segonds, F., Maranzana, N., Veron, P., Aoussat, A.: Collaborative reverse engineering design experiment using PLM solutions. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 27(5), 1037–1045 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martínez, J., Sauza, J., Ricci, F., Chiabert, P.: Validation process model for product lifecycle management. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 7(2/3), 230 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott, F., Mcdonnell, W., Burkett, M.: Designing medical devices to improve patient outcomes (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lantada, A.D., Morgado, P.L.: Introduction to modern product development. In: Lantada, A. (ed.) Handbook on Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technologies for Biomedical Devices, pp. 1–17. Springer, Boston (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6789-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martínez, J.M.: Visualization model for product lifecycle management: processes, activities, roles and items involved in product lifecycle. Politecnico di Torino (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Unkovskiy, A., Spintzyk, S., Brom, J., Huettig, F., Keutel, C.: Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: a preliminary experience in digital workflow. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pham, C.C., et al.: How to share complex data and knowledge: application in bio-imaging. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12), 1098–1103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allanic, M., Hervé, P.-Y., Durupt, A., Joliot, M., Boutinaud, P., Eynard, B.: PLM as a strategy for the management of heterogeneous information in bio-medical imaging field. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag. 16(1), 5–30 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ngo, T., Bernard, A., Belkadi, F.: Interest of PLM for data sharing in the patient treatment process requiring prosthesis implantation. In: 15e Colloque National AIP-Priméca, no. 73, pp. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schuh, G., Rozenfeld, H., Assmus, D., Zancul, E.: Process oriented framework to support PLM implementation. Comput. Ind. 59(2–3), 210–218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management, vol. 2, 3rd edn. Springer, Geneva (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Labbi, O., Ouzizi, L., Douimi, M., Aoura, Y.: A model to design a product and its extended supply chain integrating PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) solution. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 7(10), 1190–1205 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kucklick, T.R.: The Medical Device R&D Handbook, vol. 21. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jardini, A.L., et al.: Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 42(8), 1877–1884 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aitchison, G.A., Hukins, D.W.L., Parry, J.J., Shepherd, D.E.T., Trotman, S.G.: A review of the design process for implantable orthopedic medical devices. Open Biomed. Eng. J. 3(1), 21–27 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu, D., Terpenny, J., Schaefer, D.: Digital design and manufacturing on the cloud: a review of software and services. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 31(1), 104–118 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Numajiri, T., Nakamura, H., Sowa, Y., Nishino, K.: Low-cost design and manufacturing of surgical guides for mandibular reconstruction using a Fibula. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 4(7), e805 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristian C. Ardila-Mejia
    • 1
  • Clara Isabel López-Gualdrón
    • 1
  • Javier Mauricio Martínez-Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Industrial de SantanderSantanderColombia

Personalised recommendations