Advertisement

How Food Companies Manage Their Innovation Process: A Multinational Food Company Point of View

  • Claudia Pinna
  • Monica Rossi
  • Sergio Terzi
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)

Abstract

This current research, as a natural consequence of previous findings, focuses on the first phase of the New Food Development (NFD) process. Being this phase the most creative and innovative, it comes naturally to think it is also the most chaotic, very difficult to standardize and to control. At the same time, this phase is considered one of the most important of the overall process, because it adds the most value to the product that is going to be created. Starting from these considerations, the aim of this paper is to enrich the previous study by understanding how food companies could enhance their competitiveness by leveraging on their front-end process, with a special focus on the use of structured approaches for creativity and innovation and on the PLM solution. An important multinational food company has been used as a case study to investigate the above research objectives and to provide a preliminary conceptual framework to model the impact of structured front-end process on the overall NFD success. This study allowed to identify how the FFE food process is structured, the main CSFs and KPIs, as well as which methods and IT tools are used to support the analyzed process. Concerning the latest, a deeper analysis has been done focusing on the PLM solution, understanding how its functionalities are used to support the different FFE process sub-activities. Finally, this work confirms the results identified in the previous study, affirming the lack of adoption that the PLM solution plays in the FFE phase.

Keywords

Food sector Innovation process New Food Development New product development NPD 

References

  1. 1.
    Lehmann, R.J., Reiche, R., Schiefer, G.: Future internet and the agri-food sector: state-of-the-art in literature and research. Comput. Electron. Agric. 89, 158–174 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossi, M., Terzi, S.: CLIMB: maturity assessment model for design and engineering processes. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 10(1), 20 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinna, C., Plo, L., Robin, V., Girard, P., Terzi, S.: An approach to improve implementation of PLM solution in food industry – case study of Poult Group. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 10(2), 151–170 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinna, C., Avolio, E., Bandinelli, R., Terzi, S., Rinaldi, R.: Product development KPIs : a case study analysis in Food and Fashion companies. In: XXII Summer School “Francesco Turco” – Industrial Systems Engineering Product (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    d’Avolio, E., Pinna, C., Bandinelli, R., Terzi, S., Rinaldi, R.: Analysing product development process and PLM features in the food and fashion industries. In: Ríos, J., Bernard, A., Bouras, A., Foufou, S. (eds.) PLM 2017. IAICT, vol. 517, pp. 509–521. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72905-3_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinna, C., Taisch, M., Terzi, S.: PLM in the food industry: an explorative empirical research in the italian market. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 238–247. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinna, C., Galati, F., Rossi, M., Saidy, C., Harik, R., Terzi, S.: Effect of product lifecycle management on new product development performances: evidence from the food industry. Comput. Ind. 100, 184–195 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, P.G., Reinertsen, D.G.: Shortening the product development cycle. Res. Manag. 35(3), 44–49 (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, R.G.: Winning at New Products: Accelerating from Idea to Launch, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic ‘front ends’ in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 57–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montoya-Weiss, M.M., O’Driscoll, T.M.: From experience: applying performance support technology in the fuzzy front end. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 17(2), 143–161 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffin, A.: The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 24–35 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Monteiro, C., Arcoverde, D.F., da Silva, F.Q.B., Ferreira, H.S.: Software support for the fuzzy front end stage of the innovation process: a systematic literature review. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Management Innovation and Technology, pp. 426–431 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Val-jauregi, E., Justel, D.: Use of tools, methods and techniques during the fuzzy front end of innovation: their impact on innovation performance – a survey based exploratory study of companies in the basque country. Innovation, 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R.K.: Case study research. Des. Methods 26(1), 93–96 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinna, C., Taisch, M., Terzi, S.: PLM in the food industry: an explorative empirical research in the italian market. In: Harik, R., Rivest, L., Bernard, A., Eynard, B., Bouras, A. (eds.) PLM 2016. IAICT, vol. 492, pp. 238–247. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Economics and Industrial EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations