Mixed Reality Tools as an Enabler for Improving Operation and Maintenance in Small and Medium Enterprises

  • Harry WhiskardEmail author
  • David JonesEmail author
  • Steve VollerEmail author
  • Chris SniderEmail author
  • James GopsillEmail author
  • Ben HicksEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 540)


The use of Mixed Reality (MR) tools can improve information retrieval, collaboration and decision making, thus aiding the management of buildings within the operation and maintenance (O&M) lifecycle stages. In this paper, we focus on the use of MR in visualising BIM data to aid building lifecycle management.

This paper compares current and emerging MR tools and explores their potential in being applied to O&M of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). MR refers to technology that enhances reality by integrating it with the digital world, such as Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR) and spherical panoramas, known as Photospheres.

Current literature on applications and limitations of MR in the O&M cycle for small businesses is explored and the user requirements for implementation and use are elicited. Key requirements are found to be cost, skill level, interoperability, pre-requisite data, interactivity and time. Using these requirements, the state-of-the-art in VR, AR and Photosphere environments is assessed and the contexts in which they are most appropriate are developed. The paper concludes with a number of recommendations for the selection of an appropriate strategy dependent on the maturity of BIM adoption within an enterprise. A number of theoretical and conceptual implications are also developed.


  1. 1.
    Akcamete, A., Akinci, B., Garrett, J.: Potential utilization of building information models for planning maintenance activities. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gheisari, M., Goodman, S., Schmidt, J., Williams, G., Irizarry, J.: Exploring BIM and mobile augmented reality use in facilities management. In: Construction Research Congress, pp. 1941–1950 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Natephra, W., Motamedi, A., Fukuda, T., Yabuki, N.: Integrating building information modeling and virtual reality development engines for building indoor lighting design. Vis. Eng. 5, 19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department for Business Innovation & Skills: Business Population Estimates for the Uk and Regions 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., Calis, G.: Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Build. Simul. 138, 431–442 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Volk, R., Stengel, J., Schultmann, F.: Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings - Literature review and future needs. Autom. Constr. 38, 109–127 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Won, J., Lee, G., Dossick, C., Messner, J.: Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 139(11), 04013014 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(12), 1321–1329 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, X., Yi, W., Chi, H.L., Wang, X., Chan, A.P.C.: A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom. Constr. 86, 150–162 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Behzadan, A.H., Dong, S., Kamat, V.R.: Augmented reality visualization: a review of civil infrastructure system applications. Adv. Eng. Inform. 29, 252–267 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hou, L., Wang, X., Truijens, M.: Using augmented reality to facilitate piping assembly: an experiment-based evaluation. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29, 05014007 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chalhoub, J., Ayer, S.K.: Using Mixed Reality for electrical construction design communication. Autom. Constr. 86, 1–10 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sacks, R., Perlman, A., Barak, R.: Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31(9), 1005–1017 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi, Y., Du, J., Lavy, S., Zhao, D.: A multiuser shared virtual environment for facility management. Procedia Eng. 145, 120–127 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Napolitano, R.K., Douglas, I.P., Garlock, M.E., Glisic, B.: Virtual tour environment of Cuba’s national school of art. In: ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2/W5, pp. 547–551 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balali, V., Ashouri Rad, A., Golparvar-Fard, M.: Detection, classification, and mapping of U.S. traffic signs using Google street view images for roadway inventory management. Vis. Eng. 3(1), 15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwiatek, K., Tokarczyk, R.: Immersive Photogrammetry in 3D Modelling (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jokinen, O., Kauhanen, H.: Lower bounds for as-built deviations against as-designed 3-D Building Information Model from single spherical panoramic image. Autom. Constr. 84, 274–291 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pauwels, P., Zhang, S., Lee, Y.C.: Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: a literature overview. Autom. Constr. 73, 145–165 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Altuity Solutions LtdBristolUK
  3. 3.University of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations