Geochemical Assessment of the Telisa Shale Gas Reservoir: A Case Study from the South Sumatra Basin, Indonesia

  • Abdul HarisEmail author
  • Aldo Hutagalung
  • Agus Riyanto
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)


The geochemical assessment of a shale gas reservoir in the Telisa Formation in the South Sumatra Basin was carried out to identify the potential shale gas distribution. The objective of this paper is to characterize the core sample by analyzing the total organic carbon (TOC) content, kerogen type and thermal maturity of shale gas layers in terms of vertical resolution based on log data from four well log data. In addition, a seismic interpretation approach including a seismic attribute analysis and an inverted acoustic impedance is explored to spatially distribute the shale gas potential based on TOC values. Geochemical assessment of the Telisa shale gas reservoir revealed that the organic richness of the reservoir is classified as fair to good in quality. Kerogen type in the reservoir is considered a mixture of type II/III (oil/gas prone) to type III (gas prone). In terms of maturity, the Telisa shale gas reservoir is categorized as “in a mature stage”, representing an oil window up to a wet gas window. The prospective reservoir distribution is indicated by a shale lithology characterized by a high acoustic impedance range of 20,000–24,000 ft/s g/cc. In contrast, the organic richness of the Telisa shale reservoir is classified as “of fair quality”, with TOC in the range of 0.75–1 wt%.


Geochemical assessment Kerogen TOC South Sumatra basin Indonesia 


  1. 1.
    Rashid, H., Sosrowidjojo, I.B., Widiarto, F.X.: Musi platform and Palembang high: a new look at the petroleum system. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Convention of the Indonesian Petroleum Association, Jakarta, May, pp. 265–276 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argakoesoemah, R.M.I., Kamal, A.: Ancient Talang Akar deepwater sediments in South Sumatra basin: a new exploration play. In: Proceedings, Deepwater and Frontier Exploration in Asia and Australasia Symposium, Jakarta, p. DFE04-OR-009, Dec 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarjono, S., Sardjito: Hydrocarbon source rock identification in the South Palembang sub-basin. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Convention of the Indonesian Petroleum Association, Jakarta, pp. 427–467, Oct 1989Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klett, T.R., Schmoker, J.W., Ahlbrandt, T.S.: Assessment hierarchy and initial province ranking. U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment 2000—Description and Results. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series—DDS-60, Chapter RH (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeliff, C.W., Trollope, S.W., Maulana, E., Exploration cycles in the corridor block, South Sumatra. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Convention of the Indonesian Petroleum Association, Jakarta, pp. 379–400, Oct 1985Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haris, A., Marbun, M.B., Bachtiar, A., Riyanto, A.: Geochemical analysis of shale gas reservoir based on well log and 3D seismic data in Pematang Formation, Central Sumatera Basin. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Current Progress in Mathematics and Sciences 20016, Depok. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings. 1862.1, 030176, pp. 1–4, 1–2 Nov 2017.
  7. 7.
    Jarvie, D.M.: Geochemical assessment of unconventional shale gas resource systems. In: Rezaee, R. (ed.), Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs, pp. 47–69. Wiley, New York (2015).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geology and Geophysics Study ProgramFMIPA Universitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia
  2. 2.Reservoir Geophysics Program, Department of PhysicsFMIPA Universitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations