Advertisement

Estimating Groundwater Evapotranspiration in Thiaroye Aquifer (Western Senegal)

  • Ousmane Coly DioufEmail author
  • Lutz Weihermüller
  • Mathias Diedhiou
  • Harry Vereecken
  • Seynabou Cissé Faye
  • Sérigne Faye
  • Samba Ndao Sylla
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

The use of diurnal or seasonal water table fluctuation (WTF) to estimate groundwater evapotranspiration (ETG) is increasing applied in ecohydrological studies. In this study, we applied the WTF method for a shallow aquifer in Senegal over the dry season 2000–2013. To analyze the applicability and validity of the WTF method for this site, the unsaturated/saturated system was first simulated using the 1-D HYDRUS model. The simulated drawdown of the water table over the 14 years ranges from 18.1 to 113.2 cm, and from 10.4 to 101.9 cm for a bare soil and a perennial grass scenario and is highly related to the annual rainfall of the previous rainy season. The results indicate that the estimated actual evapotranspiration (ETa) from the Hydrus model ranged between 0.22 and 1.11, and between 0.23 and 1.27 mm d−1 in bare soil and vegetative condition, respectively. Results indicate that higher ETa values were observed when the water table is shallow, suggesting that ETa is driven mainly by the water table depth.

Keywords

Evapotranspiration Water table fluctuation Semi-arid regions Unsaturated zone 

References

  1. 1.
    Kollett, S.J., Cvijanovic, I., Schüttemeyer, D., Maxwell, R.M., Moene, A.F., Bayer, P.: The influence of rain sensible heat and subsurface energy transport on the energy balance at the land surface. Vadose Zone J. 8, 846–857 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson, K., Goldstein, A., Falge, E., Aubinet, M., Baldocchi, D., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Ceulemans, R., Dolman, H., Field, C., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Law, B.E., Kowalski, A., Meyers, T., Moncrief, J., Monson, R., Oechel, W., Tenhunen, J., Valentini, R., Verma, S.: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric. For. Meteorol. 113, 223–243 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moffat, A.M., Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Hollinger, D.Y., Richardson, A.D., Barr, A.G.: Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 147, 209–232 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Healy, R.W., Cook, P.G.: Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 91–109 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schindler, U., Durner, W., von Unold, G., Müller, L.: Evaporation method for measuring unsaturated hydraulic properties of soils: extending the measurement range. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74(4), 1071–1083 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, P., Grinevsky, S.O., Pozdniakov, S.P., Yu, J., Dautova, D.S., Min, L., Chaoyang, D., Zhang, Y.: Application of the water table fluctuation method for estimating evapotranspiration at two phreatophyte-dominated sites underhyper-arid environments. J. Hydrol. 519, 2289–2300 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ousmane Coly Diouf
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lutz Weihermüller
    • 2
  • Mathias Diedhiou
    • 1
  • Harry Vereecken
    • 2
  • Seynabou Cissé Faye
    • 1
  • Sérigne Faye
    • 1
  • Samba Ndao Sylla
    • 3
  1. 1.Geology Department, Faculty of Sciences and TechniquesUniversity Cheikh Anta Diop, DakarDakar-FannSenegal
  2. 2.Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHAgrosphere Institute IBG-3JülichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences and TechniquesUniversity Cheikh Anta Diop, DakarDakar-FannSenegal

Personalised recommendations