Virtual Reality as a Learning Tool: How and Where to Start with Immersive Teaching

  • Ivan StojšićEmail author
  • Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski
  • Olja Maričić


Innovations in the field of educational technology are very prominent. The application of immersive virtual reality (VR) in teaching and learning is currently in the focus of interest of researchers dealing with education. Numerous studies indicated that there are significant potential benefits of using this technology to improve learning outcomes and students’ motivation, overcome school-based and test anxiety, influence empathy, and ensure students focus on teaching content. However, there is still an issue of economic justification of investment in head-mounted displays (HMDs) and VR software for school use. Additionally, the key questions that arise from using VR in the classroom are on what theoretical basis to build immersive teaching and how to choose relevant content. The purpose of this chapter is to present a literature review of VR applications in education (with emphasis on both technological and pedagogical aspects, integration, and evaluation criteria), as well as to show the results of a small qualitative study conducted with teachers and an educational media specialist (all familiar with using VR as a teaching tool) in the Republic of Serbia.


Educational technology Head-mounted display Immersive learning Immersive technologies Technology-enhanced learning Virtual learning environment Virtual reality 



This research is part of the project no. 142-451-2511/2017-04 (Funded by Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Science, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia).


  1. Alsina-Jurnet, I., Carvallo-Beciu, C., & Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J. (2007). Validity of virtual reality as a method of exposure in the treatment of test anxiety. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 844–851. Scholar
  2. Bälter, O. (2017). Moving technology-enhanced-learning forward: Bridging divides through leadership. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3).
  3. Boud, A. C., Haniff, D. J., Baber, C., & Steiner, S. J. (1999). Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. In E. Banissi, F. Khosrowshahi, M. Sarfraz, E. Tatham, & A. Ursyn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international conference on information visualization: An international conference on computer visualization & graphics (pp. 32–36). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Scholar
  4. Chretien, K., Goldman, E., & Faselis, C. (2008). The reflective writing class blog: Using technology to promote reflection and professional development. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(12), 2066–2070. Scholar
  5. Cochrane, T. (2016). Mobile VR in education: From the fringe to the mainstream. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 8(4), 44–60. Scholar
  6. Cochrane, T., Cook, S., Aiello, S., Christie, D., Sinfield, D., Steagall, M., et al. (2017). A DBR framework for designing mobile virtual reality learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6), 54–68. Scholar
  7. Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. Scholar
  8. Daniela, L., Kalniņa, D., & Strods, R. (2017). An overview on effectiveness of technology enhanced learning (TEL). International Journal of Knowledge Society Research (IJKSR), 8(1), 79–91. Scholar
  9. Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422. Scholar
  10. Freina, L., & Canessa, A. (2015). Immersive vs desktop virtual reality in game based learning. In R. Munkvold & L. Kolås (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th European conference on games based learning – ECGBL 2015 (pp. 195–202). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.Google Scholar
  11. Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. In I. Roceanu, F. Moldoveanu, S. Trausan-Matu, D. Barbieru, D. Beligan, & A. Ionita (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international scientific conference “eLearning and software for education” – eLSE: Rethinking education by leveraging the eLearning pillar of the digital agenda for Europe (Vol. 1, pp. 133–141). Bucharest, Romania: “CAROL I” National Defence University Publishing House. Scholar
  12. Graziano, K. J. (2017). Immersive technology: Motivational reactions from preservice teachers. Internet Learning, 6(1), 33–58. Scholar
  13. Graziano, K. J., & Daley, S. (2017). Preservice teachers’ motivational reactions to online instructional materials on immersive technology. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 757–765). Austin, TX: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  14. Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 15. Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J., Magallón-Neri, E., Rus-Calafell, M., & Peñaloza-Salazar, C. (2009). Virtual reality exposure therapy for school phobia. Anuario de Psicología, 40(2), 223–236.Google Scholar
  16. Hoel, T., & Mason, J. (2018). Standards for smart education – Towards a development framework. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 3. Scholar
  17. Hussein, M., & Nätterdal, C. (2015). The benefits of virtual reality in education: A comparison study (BSc thesis, University of Gothenburg, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden). Retrieved from
  18. Jasper, M. A. (2005). Using reflective writing within research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10(3), 247–260. Scholar
  19. Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529. Scholar
  20. Johnston, E., Olivas, G., Steele, P., Smith, C., & Bailey, L. (2018). Exploring pedagogical foundations of existing virtual reality educational applications: A content analysis study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(4), 414–439. Scholar
  21. Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., Cheng, I. L., & Chew, S. W. (2016). Evolution is not enough: Revolutionizing current learning environments to smart learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 561–581. Scholar
  22. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. Scholar
  23. Kovács, P. T., Murray, N., Rozinaj, G., Sulema, Y., & Rybárová, R. (2015). Application of immersive technologies for education: State of the art. In Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on interactive mobile communication technologies and learning (IMCL 2015) (pp. 283–288). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. Scholar
  24. Liu, D., Bhagat, K. K., Gao, Y., Chang, T.-W., & Huang, R. (2017). The potentials and trends of virtual reality in education. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 105–130). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  25. Maples-Keller, J. L., Bunnell, B. E., Kim, S.-J., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 25(3), 103–113. Scholar
  26. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469–486. Scholar
  27. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. Scholar
  28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Minocha, S., Tudor, A.-D., & Tilling, S. (2017). Affordances of mobile virtual reality and their role in learning and teaching. In L. Hall, T. Flint, S. O'Hara, & P. Turner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international BCS human computer interaction conference (HCI 2017). Swindon, UK: BCS Learning and Development. Scholar
  30. Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., & Stirling, A. (2017). Virtualisation devices for student learning: Comparison between desktop-based (Oculus rift) and mobile-based (Gear VR) virtual reality in medical and health science education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6), 1–10. Scholar
  31. Moyle, K. (2010). Building innovation: Learning with technologies (Australian education review, 56). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
  32. Muhanna, M. A. (2015). Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 27(3), 344–361. Scholar
  33. Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Mining learning and crafting scientific experiments: A literature review on the use of Minecraft in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 355–366.Google Scholar
  34. Olmos, E., Cavalcanti, J. F., Soler, J.-L., Contero, M., & Alcañiz, M. (2018). Mobile virtual reality: A promising technology to change the way we learn and teach. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning (pp. 95–106). Singapore: Springer. Scholar
  35. Pantelidis, V. S. (2009). Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2(1–2), 59–70.Google Scholar
  36. Parsons, T. D., & Rizzo, A. A. (2008). Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(3), 250–261. Scholar
  37. Prins, M. J., Gunkel, S., & Niamut, O. A. (2017). TogetherVR: A framework for photo-realistic shared media experiences in 360-degree VR. In Technical papers of IBC2017 conference. Retrieved from Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  38. Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  39. Puentedura, R. R. (2015). SAMR: Approaches to implementation. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  40. Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1993). Three views of virtual reality: Nonimmersive virtual reality. Computer, 26(2), 81–83. Scholar
  41. Romrell, D., Kidder, L. C., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(2).
  42. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 2. Scholar
  44. Spector, J. M. (2016). The potential of smart technologies for learning and instruction. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 21–32. Scholar
  45. Stojšić, I., Ivkov Džigurski, A., Maričić, O., Ivanović Bibić, L., & Đukičin Vučković, S. (2017). Possible application of virtual reality in geography teaching. Journal of Subject Didactics, 1(2), 83–96. Scholar
  46. Stupar-Rutenfrans, S., Ketelaars, L. E. H., & van Gisbergen, M. S. (2017). Beat the fear of public speaking: Mobile 360° video virtual reality exposure training in home environment reduces public speaking anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 624–633. Scholar
  47. Vega, J., Rose, S., Eckhardt, C., Tahai, L., Humer, I., & Pietroszek, K. (2017). VR wildfire prevention: Teaching campfire safety in a gamified immersive environment. In S. N. Spencer (Ed.), Proceedings of VRST ‘17 – the 23rd ACM conference on virtual reality software and technology. New York, NY: ACM. Scholar
  48. Vishwanath, A., Kam, M., & Kumar, N. (2017). Examining low-cost virtual reality for learning in low-resource environments. In O. Mival, M. Smyth, & P. Dalsgaard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on designing interactive systems – DIS ‘17 (pp. 1277–1281). New York, NY: ACM. Scholar
  49. Yesilbursa, A. (2011). Reflection at the interface of theory and practice: An analysis of pre-service English language teachers’ written reflections. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 50–62. Scholar
  50. Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 4. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Stojšić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski
    • 1
  • Olja Maričić
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Novi SadFaculty of SciencesNovi SadRepublic of Serbia
  2. 2.University of Novi SadFaculty of Education in SomborSomborRepublic of Serbia

Personalised recommendations