Advertisement

Hydrochemistry

  • Zekâi ŞenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

In the previous chapter, there were methodologies and related software about the quantity of groundwater resources. In practical applications, water quality is another very significant dimension for the planning and joint water resources management. For this purpose, major anion and cation analyses provide basic quality classification information in addition to few composite variable measurements such as the electric conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). Any chemical analysis and related data processing affairs fall within the water quality domain, which is also referred to generally as hydrochemistry.

References

  1. Ahmad, N., (1998). Evaluation of groundwater resources in the upper middle part of Chaj Doab Area, Pakistan. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.Google Scholar
  2. Hill, R.A., (1940). Geochemical patterns in the Coachella Valley, California. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union. 44:815-819.Google Scholar
  3. Piper, A.M. (1944). A graphical procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. Am Geophys Union Trans 25:914–928.Google Scholar
  4. Ross, T. J., (1995). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Schoeller, H., (1967). Geochemistry of groundwater. An international guide for research and practice” UNESCO, Chapter 15, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. Şen, Z., (2015). Practical and Applied Hydrogeology. Elsevier, 406 p.Google Scholar
  7. Şen, Z., (2016) Applied and Practical Hydrogeology. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 496 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Şen, Z., (2009). Fuzzy Groundwater Classification Rule Derivation from Quality Maps. Water Quality and Health, Vol. 1: 115.Google Scholar
  9. Şen, Z., and Dakheel, A., (1986). Hydrochemical facies evaluation in Umm Er Radhuma Limestone, Eastern Saudi Arabia. Ground Water, Vol. 24(5):626–635.Google Scholar
  10. Şen, Z., Saud, A.A., Altunkaynak, A., Özger, M., (2004). Increasing water supply by mixing fresh and saline of ground waters. JAWRA J., American Water Resour. Assoc., Vol. 39(5):1209–1215.Google Scholar
  11. Stiff, H.A., Jr., (1951). The interpretation of chemical water analysis by means of patterns: Journal of Petroleum Technology, v. 3. no. 10, p. 15–17.Google Scholar
  12. Wilcox, L.V., (1955). Classification and use of irrigation waters. USDA, Circular 969, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Zadeh, L.A., (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. Vol. 8:338–353.Google Scholar
  14. Zadeh, L. A., (1999). From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words – From Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems – I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 45:105–119.Google Scholar
  15. Zadeh, L.A., (2001). The problem of deduction in an environment of imprecision, uncertainty, and partial truth. In: Nikravesh M, Azvine B (eds), FLINT 2001, New Directions in Enhancing the Power of the Internet, UC Berkeley Electronics Research Laboratory, Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M01/28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesIstanbul Medipol UniversityBeykoz, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations