Advertisement

Methodological Guidelines in Indigenous Organization Research

  • Tyron Rakeiora Love
Chapter

Abstract

Researching in the emerging field of indigenous organization studies is an exciting and valuable prospect, but it can be a chaotic, frustrating, and time-consuming endeavour when engaging with people, collecting their stories, interpreting their knowledge work, and making sense of it for presentation to academic and practitioner audiences. In order to assist researchers new to the field, this chapter offers a broad set of methodological guidelines to help negotiate some of the terrain. Methodological guidelines are the elements which increase the value of a research project. While certainly not an exclusive list, several key elements are put forward relating to the broad area of study, the phenomenon of interest, reviewing established knowledges, engaging in narrative theorizing, and determining research purpose.

Keywords

Indigenous organization studies Theorizing Theory Methodology Methodological guidelines Research phenomena Research design Research outcomes Research impact 

References

  1. Ali, S. H., Jorgensen, M., Kalt, J. P., Krakoff, S., McInnis, A., Medford, A. B., et al. (2014). On improving tribal-corporate relations in the mining sector: A white paper on strategies for both sides of the table. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, K. (2013). Contemporary social & sociological theory: Visualizing social worlds (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarado, J. (2009). Fair trade in Mexico and abroad: An alternative to the Walmartopia? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awatere, S., Mika, J., Hudson, M., Pauling, C., Lambert, S., & Reid, J. (2017). Whakatipu rawa ma ngā uri whakatipu: Optimising the “Māori” in Māori economic development. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 13(2), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka Uranium Mine. Organization & Environment, 13(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruijn, E., & Whiteman, G. (2010). That which doesn’t break us: Identity work by local indigenous ‘stakeholders’. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champagne, D. (2007). Social change and cultural continuity among native nations. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chilisa, B., Major, T. E., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2008). Managing & organizations: An introduction to theory & practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawley, A., & Sinclair, A. (2003). Indigenous human resource practices in Australian mining companies: Towards an ethical model. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, S. E. (1992). Navajo uranium workers and the effects of occupational illnesses: A case study. Human Organization, 51(4), 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deetz, S. (1996). Crossroads—Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and indigenous inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on “what theory is not”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durie, M. (2003). Ngā kāhui pou: Launching Māori futures. Wellington: Huia.Google Scholar
  21. Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management (C. Storrs, Trans.). London, UK: Pitman & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haar, J. M., & Brougham, D. (2011). Consequences of cultural satisfaction at work: A study of New Zealand Māori. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49(4), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haar, J. M., Roche, M., & Taylor, D. (2012). Work-family conflict and turnover intentions of indigenous employees: The importance of the whanau/family for Māori. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2546–2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henry, E. (2007). Kaupapa Māori entrepreneurship. In L.-P. Dana & R. B. Anderson (Eds.), International handbook of research on indigenous entrepreneurship (pp. 536–548). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Kuntz, J. R. C., Näswall, K., Beckingsale, A., & Macfarlane, A. H. (2014). Capitalising on diversity: Espousal of Māori values in the workplace. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 55, 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh, C. (2009). ‘Don’t call me Eskimo’: Representation, mythology and hip hop culture on Baffin Island. MUSICultures, 36, 110–129.Google Scholar
  29. Nandu-Templeton, J., Vanderklei, M., de Vries, H., Love, T., & Hamilton, R. (2017). Interpreting the narratives of Māori entrepreneurs. MAI Journal, 6(2), 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Opie, T., & Roberts, L. M. (2017). Do black lives really matter in the workplace? Restorative justice as a means to reclaim humanity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(8), 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peredo, A. M., Anderson, R. B., Galbraith, C. S., Honig, B., & Dana, L. P. (2004). Towards a theory of indigenous entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 1(1–2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prendergast-Tarena, E. (2015). Indigenising the corporation: Indigenous organisation design: An analysis of their design, features, and the influence of indigenous cultural values. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  34. Reid, J., Varona, G., Fisher, M., & Smith, C. (2016). Understanding Māori ‘lived’ culture to determine cultural connectedness and wellbeing. Journal of Population Research, 33(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid, L. (2011). Looking back to look forward: Māori cultural values and the impact on career. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 1(3), 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reinert, E. S. (2006). The economics of reindeer herding: Saami entrepreneurship between cyclical sustainability and the powers of state and oligopolies. British Food Journal, 108(7), 522–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricoeur, P. (1991). Time and narrative (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ruckstuhl, K., Carter, L., Easterbrook, L., Gorman, A. R., Rae, H., Ruru, J., et al. (2013). Māori and mining. Te Poutama Māori, University of Otago, The Māori and Mining Research Team. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/4362
  39. Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., Meo-Sewabu, L., & Decena, T. (2017). Indigenous entrepreneurship on customary land in the Pacific: Measuring sustainability. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(6), 774–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Raleigh, NC: Alex Catalogue.Google Scholar
  42. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  44. Widener, P. (2007). Oil conflict in Ecuador: A photographic essay. Organization and Environment, 20(1), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tyron Rakeiora Love
    • 1
  1. 1.UC Business SchoolUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations