Advertisement

Urban Stormwater Management and Sponge City Concept in China

  • Wu Che
  • Wei ZhangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 12)

Abstract

To mitigate the negative impacts of urban stormwater problems related to rapid urbanization in China, a new term “sponge city” was proposed, with related practices and implementation approaches examined in depth. The components and main goals of the sponge city concept and stormwater management criteria were introduced, while the relationship and difference between sponge cities in China and urban stormwater management systems in developed countries were compared and analyzed. Moreover, the policy and regulations that have been released were summarized, and recommendations for the future of sponge city development were provided.

Keywords

Low-impact development Stormwater management Sponge city China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51608026), Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Urban Design Projects (No. UDC2016040100), and Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture Foundation (No. 00331616049). The authors acknowledge the research team members for their enthusiastic support.

References

  1. Azzout Y, Barraud S, Cres FN, Alfakih E (1994). Techniques alternatives en assainissement pluvial. Choix, conception, realisation et entretien. (Alternative stormwater management techniques: Selection, design, construction and maintenance). Collection Tec & Doc, Lavoisier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumensaat F, Staufer P, Heusch S, Reußner F, Schütze M, Seiffert S et al (2012) Water quality-based assessment of urban drainage impacts in Europe–where do we stand today? Water Sci Technol 66(2):304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chauvin JP, Glaeser E, Ma Y, Tobio K (2017) What is different about urbanization in rich and poor countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States. J Urban Econ 98:17–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Che W, Zhang W, Li JQ, Li HY, Wang JL (2010) Outline of some stormwater management and LID projects in Chinese urban area. Water infrastructure for sustainable communities: China and the world. IWA Publishing, London, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  5. Che W, Yan P, Zhao Y, Tian F (2014) Development and analysis of international updated Stormwater Management Systems. China Water Wastewater 30(18):45–51 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. China Statistical Yearbook (2012) China statistical yearbook 2012. National Bureau of Statistics of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. CIRIA (2000) Sustainable urban drainage systems – design manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland. CIRIA Report No. C521, DundeeGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Environmental Resources (1999) Low-impact development: an integrated design approach. Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County, Upper MarlboroGoogle Scholar
  9. Fletcher TD, Shuster WD, Hunt WF et al (2015) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12(7):525–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan D, Xiao L, McNabola A (2017) Evaluation of combined sewer overflow assessment methods: case study of Cork City, Ireland. Water and Environment Journal 31(2):202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roesner LA, Traina P (1994) Overview of federal law and USEPA regulations for urban runoff. Water Sci Technol 29(1–2):445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schueler TR (1987) Controlling urban runoff: a practical manual for planning and designing urban BMPs. Washington Metropolitan Water Resources Planning Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Schuetze T (2013) Rainwater harvesting and management–policy and regulations in Germany. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 13(2):376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Q, Zhao Z, Shen N, Liu T (2015) Have Chinese cities achieved the win–win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency. Ecol Indic 51:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang R, Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB (2013) Consequential environmental and economic life cycle assessment of green and gray stormwater infrastructures for combined sewer systems. Environ Sci Technol 47(19):11189–11198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Whelans C, Maunsell HG, Thompson P (1994) Planning and management guidelines for water sensitive urban(residential) design. Department of Planning and Urban Development of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang K, Che W, Zhang W, Zhao Y (2016) Discussion about initial runoff and volume capture ratio of annual rainfall. Water Sci Technol 74(8):1764–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang W, Che W (2016) Connotation and multi-angle analysis of sponge city construction. Water Resource Protection 32(6):19–26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Urban Sewage System Construction and Risk ControlBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of EducationBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Urban DesignBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations