Advertisement

The Sublime and the Empirical Datum in Psychology: An Exercise of Conceptual Approximation

  • Marina Assis Pinheiro
  • Graciana Vieira de Azevedo
  • Taciana Feitosa de Melo
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

The Aesthetics issue in philosophy brings important reflections to the understanding of psychological processes. Burke and Kant produced an episteme full of premises for which the sublime acts as a frontier regarding the mundane and the beautiful, in order to provide the non-apprehensible, the suspension of the field of the linguistic senses before the absolute intelligible. In the eighteenth century, the sublime was born in the European Aesthetic Philosophy through Edmund Burke contributing with the notion that the sublime is linked to the pleasures and pains of the body. The principle of these two contradictory sensations comes together as the basis of an aesthetic experience that results in subjective sensibility. It is through imagination that aesthetic experience then becomes a field of creative perception, in which the sublime will have primary relation to it. In this chapter we explore an essay of a student resignifying her school life. In her writing, the student presents a character attending sixth grade lessons on her first day at a new school. In all lessons which the character describes, we observe some dynamics characterised by the exacerbation of activities and actions in the classroom that highlights the body in movement. The analysis of the essay suggests that the affective excesses played out through the body in movement and highlighted in relation to the context of the classes may constitute discursive markers of the experience of the sublime.

Keywords

Aesthetics Philosophy Sublime Imagination Body 

References

  1. Azevedo, G. V. (2017). Construção de significados na transição escolar para o 6° ano do Ensino Fundamental. Doctoral Thesis, Cognitive Psychology, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, E. (2015). A philosophical enquiry into the sublime and beautiful. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cerón, I., & Reis, P. (Orgs.) (1998). Kant: crítica e estética na modernidade. São Paulo: Editora Senac, n.248.Google Scholar
  5. Faraco, C. A. (2003). Linguagem e diálogo: As idéias lingüísticas do círculo de Bakhtin. Curitiba: Criar Edições.Google Scholar
  6. Frayze-Pereira, J. A. (2006). Arte, dor: inquietudes entre estéticae psicanálise. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, I. (2005). Critique of Judgment. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.Google Scholar
  8. Lyotard, J. (1993). Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. Translation by Constança Marcondes Cesar and Lucy R. Moreira Cesar. Campinas: Papirus.Google Scholar
  9. Tateo, L. (2017). Poetic destroyers: Vico, Emerson and the aesthetic dimension of experiencing. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), 1–19 Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2014). Open complementarity in cultural psychology. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Cultural psychology and its future: Complementarity in a new key (pp. 77–91). Charlotte: Information Age Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Valsiner, J. (2018). In M. Lyra & M. Pinheiro (Eds.), Cultural Psychology as Basic Science: Dialogues with Jaan Valsiner. Recife: SpringerBriefs2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Assis Pinheiro
    • 1
  • Graciana Vieira de Azevedo
    • 2
  • Taciana Feitosa de Melo
    • 1
  1. 1.UFPERecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Colégio de Aplicação – UFPERecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations