Advertisement

The Tension A <-> non-A in the Meaning-Making of a Chemical Element in a Sociogenetic Level

  • João Roberto Ratis Tenório da Silva
  • Gabriel Fortes Macêdo
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

The meaning construction of “A” implies also the construction of a “non-A.” The tension A <-> non-A represents the process by which meanings acquire possible levels of stability. In this sense, Valsiner (in this volume) argues that how it is possible to arrive in abstractive concepts in science analyzing how people construct new meanings from concrete actions. According to this approach, culture becomes a meta-concept in human science giving space for various theoretical perspectives that are at the level of abstraction of other basic sciences. In Chemistry, many theoretical models were proposed to understand matter and its behavior. This process, through history, can be understood by the model A <-> non-A tension discussed by Valsiner in the Cultural Psychology of Dynamic Semiosis (CPDS) field. Thus, the production of scientific model can be explained by the dynamic of meaning-making in a sociogenetic level, in which opposite meanings emerge and coexist in tension. To illustrate this idea, we intent to provide support to understanding and modeling human semiosis aiming to comprehend how the scientific concept of chemical element acquires an abstract level in tension with concrete views in some periods of history of science.

Keywords

Science Element Meaning-making Chemistry Tension 

References

  1. Aristotle. (1995). The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford translation (Ed. by J. Barnes). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkins, P. W., & de Paula, J. (2006). Atkins’ Physical chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, G. (1975). La philosophie du non. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Habashi, F. (2000). Zoroaster and the theory of four elements. Bulletin for the History of Chemistry, 25, 109–115.Google Scholar
  5. Kinsgley, P. (1994). Empedocles and his interpreters: The four-elements doxography. Phronesis, 39(03), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lavoisier, A. L. (1789). Traité Élémentaire De Chimie, 1789. Available in: http://www.labirintoermetico.com/01Alchimia/Lavoisier_A_L_de_Traite_eleme ntaire_de_chimie(1789).pdf. Accessed 07/06/2018.
  8. Mortimer, E. F., & El-Hani, C. N. A. (2014). Theory of teaching and learning scientific concepts, Contemporary trends and issues in science education (Vol. 42, XVII, p. 330). Hollanda: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Partington, J. R. (1989). A short history of chemistry (3rd ed.p. 415). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  11. Silva, J. R. R. T., & Silva, N. M. (2017). Identificação de Compromissos Epistemológicos no Desenvolvimento Histórico do Conceito de Elemento. Revista Debates em Ensino de Química, 3, 93–118.Google Scholar
  12. Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi, India: Foundations of Cultural Psychology, Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Valsiner, J. (2013). Creating sign hierarchies: Social representation in its dynamic context. Papers on Social Representations, 22(2), 16.1–16.32.Google Scholar
  15. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Zittoun, T., & Cerchia, F. (2013). Imagination as expansion of experience. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 47, 305–324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Roberto Ratis Tenório da Silva
    • 1
  • Gabriel Fortes Macêdo
    • 2
  1. 1.Federal University of Pernambuco, Núcleo de Formação DocenteCaruaruBrazil
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFederal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations