Advertisement

A Critical Reflection on the Expectations About the Impact of Educational Robotics on Problem Solving Capability

  • Francesca AgatolioEmail author
  • Michele Moro
  • Emanuele Menegatti
  • Monica Pivetti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 867)

Abstract

This paper discuss the outcomes of an experimental course we run during the 2016-17 school year in two secondary junior schools. The aim of the experiment was to validate the use of educational robotics as a mindtool, investigating the impact of robotics on problem solving capability. The course lasted about four months and it was evaluated through a self-assessment with pre and post-activity questionnaires. The emerged results encouraged us to reflect about the role of metacognition and the importance to take it into account for the evaluation of problem solving. In the paper, the activity with the students is described and the analysis of the pre and post-activity questionnaires are discussed and conclusions are drawn.

Keywords

Educational robotics Problem solving capability Learning support tool 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the University of Padova with the grant ERASM and by EU Erasmus+ project RoboESL

References

  1. 1.
    Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 63–71 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Frangou, S., Papanikolaou, K.: Robotics & constructivism in education: the terecop project. EuroLogo 40, 19–24 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barak, M., Zadok, Y.: Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 19(3), 289–307 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Denis, B., Hubert, S.: Collaborative learning in an educational robotics environment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17(5), 465–480 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eguchi, A.: Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. J. Autom. Mob. Robot. Intell. Syst. 8(1), 5–11 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher, R.: Thinking about thinking: Developing metacognition in children. Early Child Dev. Care 141(1), 1–15 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flavell, J.H.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34(10), 906 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hussain, S., Lindh, J., Shukur, G.: The effect of lego training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(3), 182–194 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C., Yueh, H.P.: Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends 43(2), 24–32 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindh, J., Holgersson, T.: Does lego training stimulate pupils ability to solve logical problems? Comput. Educ. 49(4), 1097–1111 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instr. Sci. 26(1), 49–63 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mikropoulos, T.A., Bellou, I.: Educational robotics as mindtools. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 5–14 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., Soto, A.: An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Auton. Robot. 25(4), 367–382 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moro, M., Agatolio, F., Menegatti, E.: The development of robotic-enhanced curricula for the roboesl project: premises, objectives, preliminary results. In: Alimisi, R. (ed.) Robotics-based Learning Interventions for Preventing School Failure & Early School Leaving, ROBOESL Conference 2016 Proceedings. EDUMOTIVA (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N.: The effect of 4-h robotics and geospatial technologies on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and attitudes. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 447–452. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., Adamchuk, V.: The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. In: 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2009, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pintrich, P.R., et al.: A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sternberg, R.J.: Intelligence as thinking and learning skills. Educ. Leadersh. 39(1), 18–20 (1981)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sullivan, F.R.: Robotics and science literacy: thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 45(3), 373–394 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Von Wright, J.: Reflections on reflection. Learn. Instr. 2(1), 59–68 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology, Including the Volume Thinking and Speech, vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Agatolio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michele Moro
    • 1
  • Emanuele Menegatti
    • 1
  • Monica Pivetti
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations