Turning Criminological Attention to Counterfeit Fashion

  • Joanna Large
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)


Changes in how we consume, impacted by developments in technology and global travel, have transformed the consumption of fashion. As the industry continues to grow, and opportunities to consume fashion develop and expand, increasing concern has been afforded to the illicit counterfeit fashion industry. These concerns highlight the potential economic damage of counterfeit branded goods in terms of intellectual property rights infringements, and, the recognition that counterfeit production and supply provides a low risk and high profit opportunity for funding criminal lifestyles and activities. This chapter introduces the issue of fashion counterfeiting, outlines the context of the book and argues the need for a more critical exploration of the consumption of counterfeit fashion.


Fashion industry Counterfeits Illicit markets Demand and supply 


  1. AIM. (2005, April). Faking It: Why Counterfeiting Matters (Briefing Paper). Brussels: Association des Industries de Marque. European Brands Association.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. (1999). The Campaign Against Dangerous Counterfeit Goods. In R. E. Kendall (Ed.), International Criminal Police Review: Special Issue on Counterfeiting. Lyon: ICPO/Interpol. Available from Accessed 13 June 2011.
  3. Antonopoulos, G. A. (2009). Cigarettes of ‘Ambiguous Quality’ in the Greek Black Market?: Findings from an Empirical Study on Cigarette Smuggling. Trends in Organised Crime, 12(3–4), 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonopoulos, G. A., Hall, A., Large, J., & Shen, A. (2017). An Introduction to the Special Issue on Counterfeiting. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonopoulos, G. A., Hall, A., Large, J., Shen, A., Crang, M., & Andrews, M. (2018). Fake Goods, Real Money. The Counterfeiting Business and Its Financial Management. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosworth, D. (2006). Modelling the Counterfeiting Decision and the Effect of Anti Counterfeiting Policies. Available from: Accessed 27 July 2011.
  7. Boukli, A., & Kotze, J. (Eds.). (2018). Zemiology: Reconnecting Crime and Social Harm. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, A. (2015). Clothing Poverty. The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Clothes. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  9. CIB. (1997). Countering Counterfeiting. A Guide to Protecting & Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights. London: Counterfeiting Intelligence Bureau [CIB]. International Chamber of Commerce [ICC].Google Scholar
  10. Crewe, L. (2017). The Geographies of Fashion. Consumption, Space, and Value. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  11. Croall, H. (2010). Middle-Range Business Crime. In F. Brookman, M. Maguire, H. Pierpoint, & T. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook on Crime. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  12. Euromonitor. (2018, April). World Market for Apparel and Footwear. Euromonitor International. Available from: Accessed 22 July 2018.
  13. European Commission. (2018). Fashion and High-End Industries in the EU. European Commission. Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Available from Accessed 22 July 2018.
  14. Europol and EUIPO. (2017). 2017 Situation Report on Counterfeiting and Piracy in the European Union. Europol and European Union Intellectual Property Office [EUIPO]. Available from Accessed 07 Dec 2017.
  15. Europol and OHIM [Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market]. (2016). 2015 Situation Report on Counterfeiting in the European Union. [EXCERPT]. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 370–382.Google Scholar
  16. Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI]. (2002, July 17). The FBI and the U.S. Customs Service Announce the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center’s First Conference for Members of Congress and Industry in Washington. Available from Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
  17. Greenpeace. (2016, January 25). Hazardous Chemicals Found in Many Outdoor Clothing Brands. Greenpeace UK. Available from Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
  18. Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, S. (2012). Theorizing Crime and Deviance. A New Perspective. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2016). Fake Meds Online. The Internet and the Transnational Market in Illicit Pharmaceuticals. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Revitalizing Criminological Theory. Towards a New Ultra-Realism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, S., Winlow, S., & Ancrum, C. (2008). Criminal Identities and Consumer Culture. Crime, Exclusion and the New Culture of Narcissism. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, A., Koenraadt, R., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2017). Illicit Pharmaceutical Networks in Europe: Organising the Illicit Medicine Market in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinonen, J. A., Holt, T. J., & Wilson, J. M. (2012). Product Counterfeits in the Online Environment: An Empirical Assessment of Victimization and Reporting Characteristics. International Criminal Justice Review, 22(4), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond Criminology. Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  26. Hobbs, D. (2002). The Firm: Organisational Logic and Criminal Culture on a Shifting Terrain. British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 549–560.Google Scholar
  27. Hopkins, D. M., Kontnik, L., & Turnage, M. (2003). Counterfeiting Exposed. Protecting Your Brand and Consumers. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  28. Hudson, R. (2019). Economic Geographies of the (Il)Legal and the (Il)Licit. In T. Hall & V. Scalia (Eds.), A Research Agenda in Global Crime. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. INTERPOL. (2014). Against Organised Crime. Interpol Trafficking and Counterfeiting Case Book 2014. Available from: Accessed 04 Jan 2018.
  30. IPCG. (2010). Intellectual Property Crime Report 2009–2010. Intellectual Property Crime Group [IPCG]. UK Intellectual Property Office. Available from: Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
  31. Khan, S., & Malik, A. (2013). Environmental and Health Effects of Textile Industry Wastewater. In A. Malik, E. Grohmann, & R. Akhtar (Eds.), Environmental Deterioration and Human Health. Natural and Anthropogenic Determinants. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Large, J. (2009). Consuming counterfeits: exploring assumptions about fashion counterfeiting. In Papers from the British Society of Criminology Conference 2009. 9. Available from: Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
  33. Large, J. (2015). ‘Get Real Don’t Buy Fakes’. Fashion Fakes and Flawed Policy: The Problem with Taking a Consumer – Responsibility Approach to Reducing the Problem of Counterfeiting. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15(2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Large, J. (2019). The Demand for Counterfeiting on the Criminological Research Agenda. In T. Hall & V. Scalia (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Global Crime. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  35. Lavorgna, A. (2014). The Online Trade in Counterfeit Pharmaceuticals: New Criminal Opportunities, Trends and Challenges. European Journal of Criminology. First Published Online on November 5 2014 as
  36. Levi, M. (2007). Organised Crime and Terrorism. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Levi, M. (2014). Thinking About Organised Crime. The RUSI Journal, 159(1), 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin, Y. J. (2011). Fake Stuff: China and the Rise of Counterfeit Goods. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lord, N., Spencer, J., Bellotti, E., & Benson, K. (2017). A Script Analysis of the Distribution of Counterfeit Alcohol Across Two European Jurisdictions. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 252–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. May, C. (2017). Transnational Crime and the Developing World. Washington, DC: Global Financial Integrity [GFI]. Available from Accessed 01 Dec 2017.
  41. McEwan, A., & Straus, L. (2009). Counterfeit Tobacco in London: Local Crime Requires an International Solution. Trends in Organised Crime, 12(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD. (1998). The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD]. Available from: Accessed 27 July 2011.
  43. OECD. (2007 [2008]). The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD]. Available from Accessed 30 Nov 2017.
  44. OECD and EUIPO. (2016). Global Trade in Fake Goods Worth Nearly Half a Trillion Dollars a Year. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD] and European Union Intellectual Property Office [EUIPO]. Available from Accessed 22 Oct 2016.
  45. Patent Office [Now Known as the UK Intellectual Property Office]. (2004). Counter Offensive: An IP Crime Strategy. Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). Available from: Accessed 12 June 2011.
  46. Pemberton, S. (2015). Harmful Societies. Understanding Social Harm. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rojek, C. (2017). Counterfeit Commerce; Relations of Production, Distribution and Exchange. Cultural Sociology, 11(1), 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shen, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2017). ‘No Banquet Can Do Without Liquor’: Alcohol Counterfeiting in the People’s Republic of China. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shen, A., Antonopoulos, G. A., & von Lampe, K. (2010). “The Dragon Breathes Smoke”: Cigarette Counterfeiting in the People’s Republic of China. British Journal of Criminology, 50(2), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, O., & Raymen, T. (2018). Deviant Leisure: A Criminological Perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 22(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spink, J., & Fejes, Z. L. (2012). A Review of the Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy Methodologies and Assessment of Currently Utilized Estimates. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(4), 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sullivan, B. A., & Wilson, J. M. (2017). An Empirical Examination of Product Counterfeiting Crime Impacting the U.S. Military. Trends in Organised Crime., 20(3–4), 316–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan, B. A., Chan, F., Fenoff, R., & Wilson, J. M. (2016). Assessing the Developing Knowledge Base of Product Counterfeiting: A Content Analysis of Four Decades of Research. Trends in Organised Crime, 20(3–4), 338–369.Google Scholar
  54. Treadwell, J. (2012). From the Car Boot to Booting It Up? eBay, Online Counterfeit Crime and the Transformation of the Criminal Marketplace. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UNODC [United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime]. (2013). Counterfeit Products. Excerpt from The Globalization of Crime: A Transnational Organized Crime Threat Assessment, 2010. Trends in Organised Crime, 16, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vagg, J., & Harris, J. (1998). Bad Goods: Product Counterfeiting and Enforcement Strategies. In M. Gill (Ed.), Crime at Work Vol. 2: Increasing the Risk for Offenders. London: Perpetuity.Google Scholar
  57. von Lampe, K. (2016). Organised Crime. Analysing Illegal Activities, Criminal Structures & Extra Legal Governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Wall, D. S., & Large, J. (2010). Jailhouse Frocks: Locating the Public Interest in Policing Counterfeit Luxury Fashion Goods. British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 1094–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White, R. (2013). Environmental Harm: An Eco-Justice Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, J. M., & Fenoff, R. (2014). Distinguishing Counterfeit from Authentic Product Retailers in the Virtual Marketplace. International Criminal Justice Review, 24(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yar, M. (2005). A Deadly Faith in Fakes: Trademark Theft and the Global Trade in Counterfeit Automotive Components. Internet Journal of Criminology.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Large
    • 1
  1. 1.School for Policy StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations