Advertisement

The Peru-EU Free Trade Agreement: Obstacle or Opportunity for Peru’s Sustainable Development?

  • Yovita Ivanova
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the current Peru-EU relationship from the recently enacted FTA perspective arguing that the balance of power that existed in the EU’s trade and development policies toward Peru prior to the agreement was much more predisposed towards a neoliberal approach (e.g. by boosting the export of mainly primary products) than now. Moreover, trade, in some particular cases, has shifted to an innovative, green, and inclusive export model that moved from a pure quantitative focus (or just calculating how much economic inputs have been created) to a more qualitative one (or how trade actually improves people’s lives and nature conservation).

References

  1. ALOP, APRODEV, CIDSE and CIFCA. 2011. Acuerdos comerciales de la Unión Europea con Centroamérica, Colombia y Perú: Obstáculos para el desarrollo sostenible. Brussels.Google Scholar
  2. Bialasiewicz, Luiza, ed. 2016. Europe in the World: EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Daly, Herman E. 1997. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. EEAS. 2016. EU Country Roadmap for Engagement with Civil Society 2016–2017. https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/peru/13408/european-union-country-roadmap-for-engagement-with-civil-society-2016-2017_en. Accessed 4 May 2017.
  5. EU. 2012. Trade Agreement Between the EU and Colombia & Peru. Brussels. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=691. Accessed 6 Mai 2017.
  6. European Commission. 2009a. EU-Andean Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/146014.htm. Accessed 3 Mai 2017.
  7. ———. 2009b. Global Europe: Competing in the World. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:r11022. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.
  8. ———. 2010. Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy. Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2015. Trade for All Joint Report. COM(2015) 497 Final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0497&from=EN. Accessed 7 Feb 2018.
  10. ———. 2015a. Assessment of Economic Benefits Generated by the EU Trade Regimes Towards Developing Countries. June. Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2015b. Trade for All. Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2017. International Cooperation, Peru. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/countries/peru_en. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
  13. European Free Trade Association. 2013. Free Trade Agreement Between the Republic of Peru and the EFTA States. Brussels and Lima.Google Scholar
  14. Gestion Newspaper. 2017. TLC entre Unión Europea y Perú: ¿Qué ha ocurrido en los primeros cuatro años? Interview con Hon. Irene Horejs, November 3. http://gestion.pe/mercados/tlc-entre-union-europea-y-peru-que-ha-ocurrido-primeros-cuatro-anos-2184220. Accessed 12 Mai 2017.
  15. GRAIN. 2008. An Agenda for Domination: Latin America FTAs with the EU. GRAIN Briefing. August.Google Scholar
  16. Granda, Fernando. 2013. The Role of the Civil Society. PUCP Magazine. http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/viewFile/14297/14916. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  17. Interview with Ana Romero, Leader of the Civil Society Organizations Platform for the Peru-EU FTA Implementation and Coordinator REDGE Peru. 08. September 2017. Lima.Google Scholar
  18. Ivanova, Yovita. 2011. Biotrade: The Potential in Peru as a Catalyst for Transitioning to a Green Economy. UNEP, Geneva.Google Scholar
  19. Organization of American States. 2012. Highlights of the Trade Agreement Between Colombia, Peru and the EU. June 12. Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Oxfam. 2015. Inequality in Peru: Reality and Risks. Oxfam Press GB.Google Scholar
  21. Peru- EU. 2016. Joint Statement of the Sub-committee on Trade and Sustainable Development. December. Brussels.Google Scholar
  22. Peruvian Commission for Foreign Trade and Tourism. 2017. Final Report of the FTA Impact Evaluation, 2016/2017. Lima.Google Scholar
  23. Peruvian Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism. 2016. Export Statistics. Lima.Google Scholar
  24. Sachs, Jeffrey, and Andrew Warner. 1995. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper (5398). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Transnational Institute. 2011. Time for Europe to Put Values and Human Rights Above Commercial Advantage, Policy Brief. March.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  28. Valdez, Jorge, and Farit Docarno. 2010. El Acuerdo Comercial con la Unión Europea: un largo camino para abrir la puerta a oportunidades y desafíos. Agenda Internacional XVII (28): 9–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yovita Ivanova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP)LimaPeru

Personalised recommendations