Advertisement

Pursuing Federal Support

  • Thomas F. Hilton
  • Carl G. Leukefeld
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Public Health book series (BRIEFSPUBLIC)

Abstract

This chapter introduces federal support – mainly NIH – because most agencies and foundations generally use NIH’s model of grant review and vetting to some extent. We start by discussing common myths about grantsmanship and how to “work the system.” That includes emphasis on finding ways to publish throughout the award period and beyond.

Keywords

Grantsmanship Myths Program officials RFAs Hot topics Hypotheses Career building Publishing Re-applying 

References

  1. Fairweather, J. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Heggeness, M. L., Carter-Johnson, F., Schaffer, W. T., & Rockey, S. J. (2016). Policy implications of aging in the NIH-funded workforce. Cell Stem Cell, 19, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hong, Y., & Honig, B. (2016). Publish and politics: An examination of business school faculty salaries in Ontario. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. O’Keefe, S., & Wang, T. C. (2013). Publishing pays: Economists’ salaries reflect productivity. The Social Science Journal, 50, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott, C. K. (2004). A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74(2004), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas F. Hilton
    • 1
  • Carl G. Leukefeld
    • 2
  1. 1.Indian Harbour BeachUSA
  2. 2.School of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol ResearchUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations