Advertisement

Developing Academic Writing Literacy While Responding to Tutor Written Feedback

  • Hugo Santiago Sanchez
  • Kenan Dikilitaş
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 30)

Abstract

This chapter reports on research that investigated the learning experiences of doctoral students for whom English was an additional language in terms of the ways in which these students developed academic writing literacy as they read, reflected on and responded to tutor-written feedback. The project took the form of a within-site, multiple-case study of individual PhD students conducted at a higher education institution in northwest Turkey. Data were collected through preliminary background interviews, think-aloud protocols and retrospective accounts. Our analysis generated evidence of both a wide variety of forms of perceived academic writing literacy development as well as the internal student factors mediating this process. The study shows that academic writing literacy development is a holistic, complex, interconnected, expansile and idiosyncratic process that is unique to students depending on what they bring to the academic writing learning experience and how these internal factors impact on their academic writing development.

Keywords

Academic literacy development Tutor written feedback EAL research students Turkey 

References

  1. Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., Rosales, J., Dyer, J., & Ru, L. (2015). Beyond deficit: Graduate student research-writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Braine, G. (2002). Academic literacy and the non-native speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385–418.Google Scholar
  8. Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crème, P., & Lea, M. R. (1999). Student writing: Challenging the myths. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Academic writing development in higher education: Perspectives, explorations and approaches (pp. 1–13). Reading: Centre for Applied Language Studies/University of Reading.Google Scholar
  11. Fernsten, L. A., & Reda, M. (2011). Helping students meet the challenges of academic writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilliver-Brown, K. E., & Johnson, E. M. (2009). Academic literacy development: A multiple perspectives approach to blended learning. Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Golebiowski, Z., & Liddicoat, A. (2002). The interaction of discipline and culture in academic writing, literacy in academic contexts. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 54–81). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Henderson, R., & Hirst, E. (2007). Reframing academic literacy: Re-examining a short course for “disadvantaged” tertiary students. English Teaching Practice and Critique, 6(2), 25–38.Google Scholar
  16. Hoadley-Maidment, E. (1997). From ‘story’ to argument: The acquisition of academic writing skills in an open-learning context. Language and Education, 11(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kathpalia, S., & Heah, C. (2008). Reflective writing: Insights into what lies beneath. RELC Journal, 39(3), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magyar, A., McAvoy, D., & Forstner, K. (2011). ‘If only we knew what they wanted’: Bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers’ expectations. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
  22. Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). ‘Becoming and being writers’: The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orsini-Jones, M. (2009). Measures for inclusion: Coping with the challenge of visual impairment and blindness in university undergraduate level language learning. Support for Learning, 24(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37(2), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rafik Galea, S., Arumugam, N., & De Mello, G. (2012). Enhancing ESL students’ academic writing skills through the term-paper. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(4), 1229–1248.Google Scholar
  26. Roberge, M., Siegal, M., & Harklau, L. (2009). Generation 1.5 in college composition – Teaching academic writing to U.S.-Educated learners of ESL. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Romova, Z., & Andrew, M. (2011). Teaching and assessing academic writing via the portfolio: Benefits for learners of English as an additional language. Assessing Writing, 16, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tribble, C., & Wingate, U. (2013). From text to corpus – A genre-based approach to academic literacy instruction. System, 41, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Department of English Language TeachingBahçeşehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations