Starting With the End in Mind: Future Focussed Curriculum in Health Promotion

  • Jane TaylorEmail author
  • Theresa Ashford
  • Karen Shelley
  • Kylie Readman


The quality curriculum assessment practice example presented in this chapter describes and reflects on the health promotion curriculum renewal journey to develop a programmatic level assessment practice aimed at: (1) improving the judgements and consistency academics make about the quality of students’ assessable work; and (2) providing greater clarity for students on assessment expectations and standards, and how these relate to work ready competencies. This journey began with a macro level curriculum renewal process initiated by a new set of graduate attributes and culminated in a programmatic level assessment Rubric Creator for use by the USC health promotion academic team. A major challenge was bringing together graduate level health promotion professional competencies, University graduate attributes and principles informing assessment, to assure student learning through productive and constructively aligned programmatic assessment. These curriculum frameworks complement and advance the focus on significant and transferable qualities and skills deemed necessary for work ready graduates. The development of the Rubric Creator aligns with Readman and Allen’s (Practical Planning and Assessment. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2013) best practice non-negotiable assessment principles which gives us confidence about the integrity of the Rubric Creator process. Feedback from academic users indicates the Rubric Creator supported the development of their assessment practice. It is our hope that this learning will contribute to greater clarity and transparency for students and the broader health promotion profession about what is assessed and how assessment happens in the USC Health Promotion programs. We believe this experience is transferable to other professional disciplines looking towards curriculum renewal and enhancing student learning experiences.


Programmatic assessment Health promotion Curricula renewal Rubric creator Graduate attributes 


  1. Angelo, T. (2012). Designing subjects for learning: Practical research-based principles and guidelines. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach. Melbourne, VIC: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. (2011). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2011. Retrieved from
  3. Australian Health Promotion Association. (2009). Core competencies for health promotion practitioners. Australian Health Promotion Association. Retrieved from
  4. Australian Qualifications Council. (2013). Australian Qualifications Framework. Retrieved from
  5. Barrie, S., Hughes, C., & Smith, C. (2009). The national graduate attributes report: Integration and assessment of graduate attributes in curriculum (Research Report). Retrieved from
  6. Barry, M. (2010). CompHP: Developing competencies and professional standards for health promotion capacity building in Europe, 1–17. Retrieved from
  7. Baum, F. (2008). The new public health (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Aligning assessment tasks with intended learning outcomes. In J. Biggs & C. Tang (Eds.), Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (pp. 37–68). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Black, P., & William, D. (2012). The reliability of assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. Scholar
  11. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. Scholar
  12. Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training. (2002). Striving for quality: Learning, teaching and scholarship. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  13. Ducasse, A. (2009). Toeing the line: Mapping graduate attributes on to assessment in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference, Darwin.Google Scholar
  14. Earl, L. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gore, J., Ladwig, J., Elsworth, W., & Ellis, H. (2009). Quality assessment: Linking assessment tasks and teaching outcomes in the social sciences. Retrieved from
  16. Howell, R. (2013). Grading rubrics: Hoopla or help? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 400–410. Scholar
  17. Hunt, L., & Chalmers, D. (Eds.). (2012). University teaching in focus: A learning centred approach. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  18. Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuzich, S., Groves, R., Hara, S., & Pelliccione, L. (2010). Building team capacity: Sustaining quality in assessment and moderation practices in a fully on-line unit. Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference.Google Scholar
  20. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. Scholar
  21. O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335. Scholar
  22. Oliver, B. (2016). Assuring graduate capabilities. Retrieved from
  23. Readman, K., & Allen, B. (2013). Practical planning and assessment. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Readman, K., & Ashford, T. (2012). Connecting with curriculum renewal via ‘natural mapping’. Paper presented at the HERDSA, Hobart.Google Scholar
  25. Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving student’s learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164. Scholar
  26. Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. Scholar
  27. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Designing authentic assessment for learning in higher education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Seltzer, B. (2010). 101 careers in public health. New York: Springer Publishing Co Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, J., O’Hara, L., & Barnes, M. (2014). Health promotion: A critical salutogenic science. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice, 2(6), 283–290.Google Scholar
  30. University of the Sunshine Coast. (2013a). Graduate attributes. Retrieved from
  31. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  32. Wood, L., Thomas, T., & Rigby, B. (2011). Assessment and standards for graduate outcomes. Asian Social Science, 7(4), 12–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Taylor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theresa Ashford
    • 1
  • Karen Shelley
    • 1
  • Kylie Readman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia
  2. 2.Murdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations