Advertisement

Tools and Technologies for Patients and Caregivers Engagement: A Qualitative Analysis of Health Professionals’ Attitudes and Day-to-Day Practice

  • Serena Barello
  • Guendalina Graffigna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 253)

Abstract

As patient engagement cannot be achieved without health professionals co-operation and agreement, attention to the clinicians’ views and attitudes about patient engagement is essential in order to deepen potential enablers and barriers for its implementation. This qualitative study aimed to identify health professionals’ attitudes towards patient engagement and the perceived hindrances and facilitators to the implementation of the patient engagement strategies in their routine practice with a particular focus of health information technologies for patient engagement. It identifies the dimensions underlying patient engagement realization, namely clinicians’ “Meanings and attitudes towards patient engagement”, “practical experience of patient engagement”, and “being a health professional in the era of patient engagement”, as well as highlights the fashion in which these dimensions operate will either activate or inhibit patient engagement innovation. Finally, the study highlighted the great potential of health technologies to support patient engagement if they are enablers of the patient-clinician relationship and not replace it.

Keywords

Patient engagement Health professionals Professional identity Technologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Hibbard, J.H., Mahoney, E.: Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. Patient Educ. Couns. 78(3), 377–381 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barello, S., Graffigna, G., Vegni, E.: Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs. Res. Pract. 7 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forbat, L., Cayless, S., Knighting, K., Cornwell, J., Kearney, N.: Engaging patients in health care: an empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and action. Patient Educ. Couns. [Internet] 74(1), 84–90 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pelletier, L.R., Stichler, J.F.: Action brief: patient engagement and activation: a health reform imperative and improvement opportunity for nursing. Nurs. Outlook [Internet] 61(1), 51–54 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hibbard, J.H., Greene, J., Shi, Y., Mittler, J., Scanlon, D.: Taking the long view: how well do patient activation scores predict outcomes four years later? Med. Care Res. Rev. [Internet] 72, 324 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexander, J.A., Hearld, L.R., Mittler, J.N., Harvey, J.: Patient-physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness. Health Serv Res. 47(3 Pt 1), 1201–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Riva, G.: How to make health information technology effective? The challenge of patient engagement. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Bonanomi, A., Menichetti, J.: The motivating function of healthcare professional in eHealth and mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes patients and the mediating role of patient engagement. J. Diabetes Res. 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barello, S., Graffigna, G., Vegni, E.: Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs. Res. Pract. [Internet] 2012, 1–7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gallivan, J., Burns, K.K., Bellows, M., Eigenseher, C.: The many faces of patient engagement. J. Particip. Med. [Internet] 4, e32 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandman, L., Granger, B.B., Ekman, I., Munthe, C.: Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Med. Health Care Philos. 15, 115–127 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edwards, A., Elwyn, G.: Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect [Internet] 9(4), 307–320 (2006). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17083558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barello, S., Graffigna, G.: Engagement-sensitive decision making: training doctors to sustain patient engagement in medical consultations. Patient Engagement: Consum.-Centered Model Innovate Healthcare (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaba, R., Sooriakumaran, P.: The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int. J. Surg. 5, 57–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Remmers, C., Hibbard, J., Mosen, D.M., Wagenfield, M., Hoye, R.E., Jones, C.: Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? J. Ambul Care Manag. 32(4), 320–327 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hibbard, J.H., Mahoney, E.R., Stock, R., Tusler, M.: Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Serv. Res. 42(4), 1443–1463 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Bonanomi, A.: The role of patient health engagement model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: a structural equation model. PLoS One 12(6) (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barello, S., Graffigna, G., Pitacco, G., et al.: An educational intervention to train professional nurses in promoting patient engagement: a pilot feasibility study. Front. Psychol. 2020 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greene, J., Sacks, R.M., Hibbard, J.H., Overton, V.: How much do clinicians support patient self-management? The development of a measure to assess clinician self-management support. Healthcare [Internet] (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Riva, G., Savarese, M., Menichetti, J., Castelnuovo, G., et al.: Fertilizing a patient engagement ecosystem to innovate healthcare: toward the first Italian consensus conference on patient engagement. Front. Psychol. 8(Jun), 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations