Advertisement

Interrogating the Value of Learning by Extension in Enhancing Professional Quality: The Case of Australian and Venezuelan Engineers

  • David ThorpeEmail author
  • Emilio A. Anteliz
  • P. A. Danaher
Chapter

Abstract

Extension learning is a particular form of continuing professional development enacted in agriculture, engineering and science, whereby already qualified and experienced practitioners engage in periods of formalised training in specific, currently topical areas of study, whether “in the field” or “off base” at a university or other training provider. This kind of learning by extension inevitably bears the traces of the historically constructed and the geopolitically mediated regional, national and provincial contexts in which it is experienced. This is certainly the situation with the exploratory, dual site case study presented in this chapter of the provision of postgraduate engineering education with a sustainability focus by the relevant school of engineering in an Australian university, and also of the provision of extension learning by a specialised section in the faculty of engineering in a Venezuelan university.

The analysis of these sites addresses the chapter’s research question: “How can engineering professional quality be enhanced through extension learning in Australia and Venezuela?”. This analysis is clustered around the three themes of professional currency, professional agency and professional mobility. This discussion highlights the situated and increasingly politicised character of the provision of extension learning for Australian and Venezuelan engineers provided by the universities under review here. At the same time, there is considerable evidence of the ongoing effectiveness of that provision for generating quality practice in this professional enterprise/production field.

Keywords

Australia Continuing professional development Engineering Extension learning Postgraduate education Practice Quality Sustainability Training Venezuela 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the inputs and insights afforded by their colleagues and the participants in the extension learning programs analysed in this chapter. The final version of the chapter has benefited from the constructive feedback of two anonymous peer reviewers. Professor Karen Trimmer has been an encouraging and facilitative editor.

References

  1. Ali, I. M., Pascoe, C., & Warne, L. (2002, April). Interactions of organizational culture and collaboration in working and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 60–68.Google Scholar
  2. Basart, J. M., & Serra, M. (2013, March). Engineering ethics beyond engineers’ ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9293-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boblin, S. L., Ireland, S., Kirkpatrick, H., & Robertson, K. (2013). Using Stake’s qualitative case study approach to explore implementation of evidence-based practice. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1267–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313502128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boni, A., & Gasper, D. (2012). Rethinking the quality of universities: How can human development thinking contribute? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-disciplinary Journal for People-Centred Development, 13(3), 451–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.679647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bot, L., Gossiaux, P.-B., Rauch, C.-P., & Tabiou, S. (2005). “Learning by doing”: A teaching method for active learning in scientific graduate education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 105–119.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790512331313868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, N. (2012). From “moral loss” to “moral reconstruction”? A critique of ethical perspectives on challenging the neoliberal hegemony in UK universities in the 21st century. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 343–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.698987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-being, 9(1).  https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, R., Ashley, R., & Farrelly, M. (2011, December). Political and professional agency entrapment: An agenda for urban water research. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 4037–4050.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9886-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerra, V. (2017). How can a strong currency or drop in oil prices raise inflation and the black-market premium? Economic Modelling.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chamberlain, J. M. (2012). The sociology of medical regulation: An introduction. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, H. (2014, October). Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science. Social Studies of Science, 44(5), 722–735.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714536011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corey, G., Schneider Corey, M., Corey, C., & Callinan, P. (2014). Issues and ethics in the helping professions (9th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  17. Cristóvão, A., Koutsouris, A., & Kügler, M. (2012). Extension systems and change facilitation for agricultural and rural development. In L. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 201–227). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, K. E. (2008, Fall). Extension in sub-Saharan Africa: Overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 15(3), 15–28. Retrieved from https://www.aiaee.org/attachments/article/111/Davis-Vol-15.3-2.pdf
  19. Davis, M. (2015). Engineering as profession: Some methodological problems in its study. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), Engineering identities, epistemologies and values: Engineering education and practice in context (Philosophy of Engineering and Technology Vol. 21) (Vol. 2, pp. 65–79). Zug, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Corte, J. (2017, November 21). Locked in a stalemate: The Organization of American States and the Venezuelan democratic crisis. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3073692
  21. Duderstadt, J. J. (2010). Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of American engineering practice, research, and education. In D. Grasso & M. B. Burkins (Eds.), Holistic engineering education (pp. 17–35). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engineers Australia. (2017). Apply for membership. Retrieved from https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/Membership
  23. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013, December). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003, Fall). Learning by doing. Chemical Engineering Education, 37(4), 282–283.Google Scholar
  25. Franz, N., Garst, B. A., Baughman, S., Smith, C., & Peters, B. (2009, August). Catalyzing transformation: Conditions in extension educational environments that promote change. Journal of Extension, 47(4). Retrieved from https://www.joe.org/joe/2009august/rb1.php
  26. Friesen, M. R. (2011). Immigrants’ integration and career development in the professional engineering workplace in the context of social and cultural capital. Engineering Studies, 3(2), 79–100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2011.571260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fry, J. D., & Ibrahim, E. (2013, September). Reassessing Venezuela’s organic hydrocarbon law: A balance between sovereignty and efficiency. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 6(3), 234–259.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwt005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fulton, A., Fulton, D., Tabart, T., Ball, P., Champion, S., Weatherley, J., & Heinjus, D. (2003, May). Agricultural extension, learning and change: A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Barton, ACT: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches to management and organization (pp. 516–525). London, UK: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gill, T. M. (2017). Unpacking the world cultural toolkit in socialist Venezuela: National sovereignty, human rights and anti-NGO legislation. Third World Quarterly, 38(3), 621–635.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.119925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goggins, J. (2012). Engineering in communities: Learning by doing. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(4), 238–250.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211253831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gorman, E. H., & Sandelfur, R. L. (2011, August). “Golden age”, quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 275–302.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411417565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grace, P. J. (2014). Philosophical foundations of applied and professional ethics. In P. J. Grace (Ed.), Nursing ethics and professional responsibility in advanced practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–43). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
  34. Guest, G. (2006). Lifelong learning for engineers: A global perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(3), 273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600644396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2014). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  37. Heitmann, G. (2005). Challenges of engineering education and curriculum development in the context of the Bologna process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 447–458.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790500213136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2012). The professional agency of teacher educators amid academic discourses. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research & Pedagogy, 38(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ingersoll, R. M., & Perda, D. (2008). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. H. Ballantine & J. Z. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (3rd ed., pp. 106–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Jonnergård, K., & Erlingsdóttir, G. (2012, September). Variations in professions’ adaption of quality reforms: The cases of doctors and auditors in Sweden. Current Sociology, 60(5), 672–689.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112440440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jørgensen, U., & Valderrama, A. (2016). The politics of engineering professionalism and education. In U. Jørgensen & S. Brodersen (Eds.), Engineering professionalism (Professional practice and education: A diversity of voices) (pp. 283–309). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Kastenhofer, K., Lansu, A., van Dam-Mieras, R., & Sotoudeh, M. (2010, March). The contribution of university curricula to engineering education for sustainable development. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(1), 44–51.  https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.19.1.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaufman, H. G. (1972). Relations of ability and interest to currency of professional knowledge among engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 495–499.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kingsbury, D. V. (2016, October). Oil’s colonial residues: Geopolitics, identity, and resistance in Venezuela. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35(4), 423–436.  https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Harris.Google Scholar
  46. Lent, R. W., Sheu, H.-B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008, October). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Litchfield, B. C., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015, Summer). Authentic assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2015(142), 65–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Murray, C., & Lawry, J. (2011, August). Maintenance of professional currency: Perceptions of occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(4), 261–269.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00927.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nasser, R. N., & Romanowski, M. H. (2016). Social justice and the engineering profession: Challenging engineering education to move beyond the technical. In M. Abdulwahed, M. O. Hasna, & J. E. Froyd (Eds.), Advances in engineering education in the Middle East and North Africa: Current status, and future insights (pp. 409–428). Zug, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Noordegraaf, M. (2011, October). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1349–1371.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611416748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006, April). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resnik, D. B. (2017). Examining the social benefits principle in research with human participants. Health Care Analysis, 26(1), 66–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0326-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Russell, J. S. (2013, June). Shaping the future of the civil engineering profession. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(6), 654–664.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000600. Retrieved from http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saks, M. (2012). Defining a profession: The role of knowledge and expertise. Professions and Professionalism, 2(1).  https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.v2i1.151 Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/151
  57. Singer, J. B. (2007). Contested autonomy: Professional and popular claims on journalistic norms. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601056866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slay, H. S., & Smith, D. A. (2011, January). Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities. Human Relations, 64(1), 85–107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710384290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Sturdy, A., & Wright, C. (2011, November). The active client: The boundary-spanning roles of internal consultants as gatekeepers, brokers and partners of their external counterparts. Management Learning, 42(5), 485–503.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611401536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tait, M. (2011, June). Trust and the public interest in the micropolitics of planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(2), 157–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11402628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas, G. (2016). How to do your case study (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Thorpe, D. S. (2016). Experiential learning approaches for developing professional skills in postgraduate engineering students. In A. Rahman & V. Ilic (Eds.), Proceedings of international conference on engineering education and research 21–24 November 2017 Western Sydney University, Parramatta Campus, Sydney, Australia. Sydney, NSW: School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University. Retrieved from https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1176746/iCEER2016_Conference_Proceedings_official.pdf
  64. University of Southern Queensland. (2017a). Course specification: ENG8104 Asset Management in an Engineering Environment. Toowoomba, QLD: Author.Google Scholar
  65. University of Southern Queensland. (2017b). Course specification: ENG8208 Advanced Engineering Project Management. Toowoomba, QLD: Author.Google Scholar
  66. University of Southern Queensland. (2017c). USQ handbook: Engineering and built environment. Retrieved from https://usq.edu.au/handbook/current/engineering-built-environment/engineering-built-environment.html
  67. University of Technology Sydney. (2017). Master of Engineering (Extension). Retrieved from https://www.masterstudies.com/Master-of-Engineering-(Extension)/Australia/UTS/
  68. Wu, H.-Y., Lin, Y.-K., & Chang, C.-H. (2011, February). Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 37–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  70. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Thorpe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emilio A. Anteliz
    • 2
  • P. A. Danaher
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Central University of VenezuelaCaracasVenezuela
  3. 3.Central Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  4. 4.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations