Advertisement

Abstract

Gliomas are primary brain tumors of central nervous system. Appropriate resection of gliomas in the early tumor stage is known to increase survival rate. However, the accurate resection of tumor is a challenging problem because the soft tissue shift may occur during the operation. To provide proper guidance to neurosurgery, it is necessary to align magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intra-operative ultrasound (iUS). In previous studies, many algorithms tried to find fiducial points that can lead to the appropriate registration. But these methods required manual specifications from experts to ensure the reliability of the fiducials. In this study, we proposed a data-driven approach for MRI-iUS non-linear registration using structural skeletons. The visualization of our results indicated that our approach might provide better registration performance.

Keywords

MRI intra-operative US Registration Skeleton 

References

  1. 1.
    Shields, L.: Management of low-grade gliomas: a review of patient-perceived quality of life and neurocognitive outcome. World Neurosurg. 87(1–2), 299–309 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Louis, D.N.: The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131(6), 803–820 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asgeir, S.: Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308(18), 1881–1888 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Voorhies, R.M.: Preliminary experience with intraoperative ultrasonographic localization of brain tumors. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 10, 8–9 (1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill, D.L.: Medical image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 46(3), R1–R45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sotiras, A.: Deformable medical image registration: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32, 1153–1190 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schnabel, J.A.: Advances and challenges in deformable image registration: from image fusion to complex motion modelling. Med. Image Anal. 33, 145–148 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiao, Y.: REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors (RESECT): a clinical database of pre-operative MRI and intra-operative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgeries. Med. Phys. 44(7), 3875–3882 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Couprie, M.: Topological maps and robust hierarchical Euclidean skeletons in cubical complexes. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 117(4), 355–369 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Telea, A.: An augmented fast marching method for computing skeletons and centerlines. In: Proceedings of the symposium on Data Visualization, pp. 251–259. Eurographics, Aire-la-Ville (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vercauteren, T., Pennec, X., Perchant, A., Ayache, N.: Non-parametric diffeomorphic image registration with the demons algorithm. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4792, pp. 319–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75759-7_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic, Electrical and Computer EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonKorea
  2. 2.School of Electronic Electrical EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonKorea
  3. 3.Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research (CNIR)Institute for Basic ScienceSuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations