Advertisement

Estimating Spatio-temporal Responses of Net Primary Productivity to Climate Change Scenarios in the Seyhan Watershed by Integrating Biogeochemical Modelling and Remote Sensing

  • Süha BerberoğluEmail author
  • Fatih Evrendilek
  • Cenk Dönmez
  • Ahmet Çilek
Chapter
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 18)

Abstract

Climate change will have a significant impact on ecosystem functions, particularly in the Mediterranean. The aim of this study is to estimate responses of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) to four scenarios of regional climate change in the Seyhan watershed of the Eastern Mediterranean, integrating biogeochemical modelling and remote sensing. The CASA model was utilised to predict annual fluxes of regional NPP for baseline (present) (2000–2010) and future (2070–2080) climate conditions. A comprehensive data set including percentage of tree cover, land cover map, soil texture, normalised difference vegetation index, and climate variables was used to constitute the model. The multi-temporal metrics were produced using sixteen-day MODIS composites at a 250-m spatial resolution. The future climate projections were based on the following four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) scenarios defined in the 5th Assessment Report of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: RCP 26, RCP 4.5, RCP 6.0 and RCP 8.5. The future NPP modelling was performed under CO2 concentrations ranging from 421 to 936 ppm and temperature increases from 1.1 to 2.6 ℃. Model results indicated that the mean regional NPP was approximately 1185 g C m−2 yr−1. Monthly NPP ranged from 10 to 260 g C m−2 for the baseline period. The total annual NPP was, on average, estimated at 3.19 Mt C yr−1 for the baseline period and 3.08 Mt C yr−1 for the future period. NPP in the Seyhan watershed appears to be sensitive to changes in temperature and precipitation. The CASA provide promising results for a better understanding and quantification of ecological and economic implications of regional impacts of climate change on biological productivity across the complex and heterogeneous watersheds of Turkey.

Keywords

Climate change IPCC Modelling MODIS NPP RCPs Turkey 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the research project grants (project no: 110Y338) from the Scientific and Technological Research Council (TÜBITAK) of Turkey.

References

  1. Australian Government (2014) Department of the Environment, 2014. Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) Fact Sheet.Google Scholar
  2. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Dönmez C, Berberoğlu S, Curran PJ (2011) Modelling the current and future spatial distribution of net primary production in a Mediterranean watershed. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 13(3):336–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erşahin S, Bilgili BC, Dikmen Ü, Ercanlı I (2016) Net primary productivity of Anatolian forests in relation to climate, 2000–2010. Forest Science 62(6):698–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evrendilek F (2014) Modeling net ecosystem CO2 exchange using temporal neural networks after wavelet denoising. Geographical Analysis 46:37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gobron N, Pinty B, Verstraete MM, Widlowski JL (2000) Advanced vegetation indices optimised for up-coming sensors: Design, performance, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38(6):2489–2505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Houghton RA (2005) Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biology 11:945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knyazikhin Y, Martonchik JV, Myneni RB, Diner DJ, Running SW (1998) Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from MODIS and MISR data. Journal of Geophysical Research 103:32257–32276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Loh WY (2002) Regression trees with unbiased variable selection and interaction detection. Statistica Sinica 12:361–386.Google Scholar
  11. Morales P, Hickler T, Rowell DP, Smith B, Sykes MT (2007) Changes in European ecosystem productivity and carbon balance driven by regional climate model output. Global Change Biology 13:108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. NASA (2013) Land processes distributed archive center web site, 2013; at: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov.
  13. Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Klooster SA (1993) Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7:81–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Potter C, Klooster S, Steinbach M, Tan P, Kumar V, Shekhar S, Nemani R, Myneni R (2003) Global teleconnections of climate to terrestrial carbon flux. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002979.
  15. Potter CS, Klooster S, Steinbach M, Tan P, Sheikarand S, Carvalho C (2004) Understanding global teleconnections of climate to regional model 13 estimates of Amazon ecosystem carbon fluxes. Global Change Biology 10:693–14 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith B, Prentice IC, Sykes MT (2001) Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modeling of terrestrial ecosystems: Comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Global Ecology Biogeography 10:621–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang G, Beckage B, Smith B, Miller PA (2010) Estimating potential forest NPP, biomass and their climatic sensitivity in New England using a dynamic ecosystem model. Ecosphere 1(6):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tottrup C, Rasmussen MS, Eklundh L, Jönsson P (2007) Mapping fractional forest cover across the highlands of mainland Southeast Asia using MODIS data and regression tree modelling. International Journal of Remote Sensing 28(1):23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang F, Xu YJ, Dean TJ (2011) Projecting climate change effects on forest net primary productivity in subtropical Louisiana, USA. AMBIO 40:506–520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0135-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang L, Gong W, Ma Y, Zhang M (2013) Modeling regional vegetation NPP variations and their relationships with climatic parameters in Wuhan, China. Earth Interactions 17(4):20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. WorldClim Climate Layers Web Page (2013); at: http://www.worldclim.org.
  22. Zhao M, Running SW (2010) Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329:940–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Süha Berberoğlu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatih Evrendilek
    • 2
  • Cenk Dönmez
    • 3
  • Ahmet Çilek
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Environmental EngineeringAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Landscape ArchitectureÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations