Climate Change and Animal Farming

  • Nazan Koluman (Darcan)Email author
  • Hasan Rüştü Kutlu
  • İnanç Güney
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 18)


In recent years, extreme climate change (CC) and atmospheric events have become a global issue. It is now well known that livestock production contributes to global warming to a certain extent. The impacts of climate change on animal production can be analysed as the direct or indirect effects of the climatic factors. The direct impacts of climate change on animals are caused by climate factors with direct impacts on physiology, such as atmosphere temperature, relative humidity and wind speed. The animals’ reactions to changing climate conditions differ, depending on being a ruminant or non-ruminant and their climate comfort zones. Animal farming impacts on climate change, as well. Global warming and climate change are mainly caused by three gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and dinitrous oxide (N2O). Moreover, the increased humidity level in the atmosphere is another factor contributing to global warming. In addition to these gases, chlorofluorocarbon, which has commonly been used in industry in the past, has also made a considerable contribution to global warming. The gases which are naturally produced have no harmful effect; on the contrary, their presence in the atmosphere within normal limits contributes to preventing some heat loss from the Earth and establishing the atmospheric conditions which ensure the sustainability of life in the earth. But the high-level release of these gases causes an increase in the rational shares of this layer and thus keeps the long- and short-wave infrared rays from the sun at a higher level. Climate change is likely to have indirect impacts on the quality and the amount of animal feeds, feeding strategies, seasonal usability of grasslands, genetic studies (hybridisation, etc.), performance and the number of animals. The other element of pressure on animal production is political, social and economic sanctions which are aimed at decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Climate experts have been made to adjust livestock production systems to forecast future climate changes based on climate modelling. From this point of view, it is very important to make correct estimations with regard to questions such as which feed, or which animal species or breeds will be the most appropriate for different regions.

Findings obtained from the brief analyses which have been done in this chapter should be urgently implemented in national livestock farming in order to overcome environmental degradation and the possible effects of climate change. Some recommendations are provided in order to alleviate the negative influences of climate change on livestock production and, vice versa, the negative influences of animal production on climate change.


Animal farming Climate change Direct and indirect effects Implementation 


  1. Adams RM, Rosenzweig C, Peart RM, Ritchie JT, Mccarl BA, Glyer JD, Curry RB, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Allen LH (1990) Global climate change and United-States agriculture. Nature 345:219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alnaimy AM, Habeeb I, Fayaz I, Marai M, Kamal TH (1992) Heat Stress, Farm Animals and the Environment. In Philips C, Piggins D (eds) International Conference on Farm Animals and the Environment, University College of North Wales, CAB International England, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Alnamier M, De Rosa G, Grasso F, Napolitana F, Bordi A (2002) Effect of climate on the response of three oestrus synchronisation techniques in lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 71:157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2006) Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil and canola oil. Journal of Animal Science 84:1489–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19:511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolle HJ, Seiler W, Bolin B (1986) Other green house gases and aerosols. Trace gases in the atmospheres. In Bolin B, Doos BOR, Jager J, Warrick RA (eds) The Green House Effect, Climate change and Ecosystems (SCOPE 29) Wiley and Sons, Chichester 157–203.Google Scholar
  7. Bos J, Wit J (1996) Environmental Impact Assessment of Landless Monogastric Livestock Production systems. In: Livestock and the Environment: Finding a Balance. FAO/World Bank/USAID, Rome.Google Scholar
  8. Bucklin RA, Turner LW, Beede DK, Bray DR, Hemken RW (1991) Methods to relieve heat stress for dairy cows in hot, humid climates. Applied Engineering Agriculture 7(2):241–247.Google Scholar
  9. Carulla JE, Kreuzer M, Machmuller A, Hess HD (2005) Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56:961–970.Google Scholar
  10. Chase LE, Sniffen CJ (1988) Feeding and managing dairy cows during hot weather. Feeding and Nutrition.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke J (2007) Climate change pushes diseases north: expert. Reuters, March 9; at: (April 23, 2008).
  12. Cristophersen CT, Wright ADG, Vercoe PE (2008) In vitro methane emission and acetate: propionate ratio are decreased when artificial stimulation of the rumen wall is combined with increasing grain diets in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86:384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crutzen PJ, Aselmann I, Seiler W (1986) Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans. Tellus 38B:271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Çoban Y, Darcan N, Aslan N, Karakök SG (2008) Global warming and its effects on animal husbandry. 4. National Zootechnics Student Congress, May 2008, Samsun, Proceedings.Google Scholar
  15. Darcan N (2005) Global warming effects on animal husbandry and alleviation to heat stress. Hasad Animal Journal 21(243):27–29.Google Scholar
  16. Davis S, Mader T, Holt S, Cerkoney W (2001a) Effects of feeding regimen on performance, behaviour and body temperature of feedlot steers. Beef cattle report.Google Scholar
  17. Davis S, Mader T, Cerkoney W (2001b) Managing heat stress in feedlot cattle using sprinklers. Beef cattle report; at:
  18. De Rensis F, Marconi P, Capelli T, Gatti F, Facciolongo F, Franzini S, Scaramuzzi RJ (2002) Fertility in postpartum dairy cows in winter or summer following estrous synchronization and fixed time AI after the induction of an LH surge with GnRH or hCG. Theriogenology 58:1675–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EEA-JRC-WHO (2008) Impacts of Europe’s changing climate – 2008 indicator-based assessment. Joint EEA-JRC-WHO report, EEA Report No 4/2008, JRC Reference Report No JRC47756, EEA, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  20. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2011) DRAFT: Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2030. Publication 430-D-11-003. EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Foley PA, Callan J, Kenny DA, Johnson KA, O’Mara FP (2007) Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum, 112 p.Google Scholar
  22. FAO (2007) Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources and the Interlaken Declaration.Rome; at:
  23. FAO (2008) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.2008. FAO Statistical Database, FAOSTAT.Google Scholar
  24. Gauly M, Bollwein H, Breves G, Brugemann K, Danicke S, Das G, Demeler J, Hansen H, Isselstein J, Konig S, Loholter M, Martinsohn M, Meyer U, Potthoff M, Sanker C, Schroder B, Wrage N, Meibaum B, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Stinshoff H, Wrenzycki C (2013) Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in Central Europe – a review. Animal 7:843–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godfray HCJ, Garnett T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369(1):23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Göncü S, Özkütük K (2003) Shower Effect at Summer Time on Fattening Performances of Black and White Bullocks. Journal of Applied Animal Research 23:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Görgülü M, Kutlu HR, Demir E, Öztürkcan O, Forbes JM (1996) Nutritional Consequances of Free-Choice Among Feed Ingredients by Awassi Lambs. Small Ruminant Research 20:23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Görgülü M, Güney O, Torun O, Özuyanik O, Kutlu HR (2003) An Alternative Feeding System for Dairy Goats: Effects of Free-Choice Feeding on Milk Yield and Milk Composition of Lactating Suckling Damascus Goats. Journal of Animal Feed Science 12:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Görgülü M, Boğa M, Şahin A, Serbester U, Kutlu HR, Şahinler S (2008) Diet Selection and Eating Behaviour of Lactating Goats Subjected to Time Restricted Feeding in Choice and Single Feeding System. Small Ruminant Research 78:41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Görgülü M, Koluman Darcan N, Göncü Karakök S (2009) Animal husbandry and global warming. 5. Ulusal Hayvan Besleme Kongresi, 30 Eylül- 3 Ekim 2009, Çorlu.Google Scholar
  31. Gworgwor ZA, Mbahi TF, Yakubu B (2006) Environmental Implications of Methane Production by Ruminants: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Environment 2(1). ISSN 0794-8867.Google Scholar
  32. Haq Z, Ishaq M (2011) Economic growth and agrifood import performance of emerging economies and Next-11. African Journal of Business Management 5:10338–10344.Google Scholar
  33. Harner JP, Smith J, Brook M, Murphy JP (1999) Sprinkler systems for cooling dairy cows at a feed line. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension service.Google Scholar
  34. Hess HD, Monsalve LM, Lascano CE, Carulla JE, Diaz TE, Kreuzer M (2013) Supplementation of a tropical grass diet with forage legumes and Sapindus saponaria fruits: effect on in vitro ruminal nitrogen turnover and methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54:703–713.Google Scholar
  35. HSUS (2008) HSUS Fact Sheet: Animal Agriculture and Climate Change.Google Scholar
  36. IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers, 2–5.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson HD (1987) Bioclimates and Livestock, World Animal Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Publication No: B5.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73:2483–2492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC (2006) Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds. International Congress Series 1293:156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koluman Darcan N, Karakök Göncü S, Daşkıran İ (2009) Strategy of adaptation animal production to global warming in Turkey. Ulusal Kuraklık ve Çölleşme Sempozyumu, 16–18 June 2009, Konya.Google Scholar
  41. Linn JG (1997) Nutritional management of lactating dairy cows during periods of heat stress.Google Scholar
  42. Lovett D, Lovell S, Stack J, Callan J, Finlay M, Conolly J, O’mara FP (2003) Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers. Livestock Production Science 84:135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin C, Rouel J, Jouany JP, Doreau M, Chilliard Y (2008) Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. Journal of Animal Science 86:2642–2650. Scholar
  44. Mbanzamihigo L, Fievez V, Da Costa Gomez C, Piattoni F, Carlier L, Demeyer DD (2001) Methane emission from the rumen of sheep fed a mixed grass-clover pasture at two fertilisation rates in early and late season. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates TW (2004a) Measurement of methane emissions from cattle using Chambers and micrometeorological techniques; at:
  46. McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates T, Colombatto D (2004b) Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid. Journal of Animal Science 82:3346–3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moss AR, Jouany J, Newbold J (2000) Methane Production by Ruminants: Its Contribution to Global Warming. Annales De Zootechnie 49:231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newbold CJ, Rode LM (2006) Dietary additives to control methanogenesis in the rumen. International Congress Series 1293:138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. NYSDEC (2006) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 2006. DEC announces consent order with Lewis County farm for manure spill; at: (23 April 2008).
  50. O’Mara F (2004) Greenhouse gas production from dairying: reducing methane production. Advances in Dairy Technology 16:295–309.Google Scholar
  51. O’Mara FP, Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, McAllister TA (2008) Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of ruminants through nutritional strategies. International Congress on Livestock and Global Climate Change, 17–20 Mayıs 2008, Hamamet, Tunus, Proceedings 40–43Google Scholar
  52. Oliveira SG, Berchielli TT, Pedreira MS, Primavesi O, Frighetto R, Lima MA (2007) Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135:236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ovenell-Roy KH, Nelson ML, Westberg HH, Froseth JA (1998) Effects of barley cultivar on energy and nitrogen metabolism of lambs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 8:389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N (2006) Effect of plant extract on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Animal Feed Science and Technology 128:276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Puchala R, Min BR, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T (2005) The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. Journal of Animal Science 83(1):182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qian G, Guo X, Guo JJ, Wu JG (2011) China’s dairy crisis: impacts, causes and policy implications for a sustainable dairy industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 18:434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reynolds CK, Tyrrell HF, Reynolds PJ (1991) Effects of diet forage-to-concentrate ration and intake on energy metabolism in growing beef heifers: whole body energy and nitrogen balance and visceral heat production. Journal of Nutrition 121:994–1,003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sauer FD, Fellner V, Kinsman R, Kramer JK, Jackson HA, Lee AJ, Chen S (1998) Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. Journal of Animal Science 76(3):906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silanikove N (2000) Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livestock Production Science 67:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Silanikove N, Koluman N (2015) Impact of climate change on the dairy industry in temperate zones: Predications on the overall negative impact and on the positive role of dairy goats in adaptation to earth warming. Small Ruminant Research 123(1):27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U, Prosser CG (2010) Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: Quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Research 89:110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 82–114.Google Scholar
  63. TUIK (2009) Environmental Statistics; at: (9 May 2009).
  64. USEPA (2008) Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Ruminant livestock: frequent questions.Google Scholar
  65. Wallace RJ (2004) Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63:621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace RJ, Wood TA, Rowe A, Price J, Yanez DR, Williams SP, Newbold CJ (2006) In Soliva CR, Takahashi J, Kreuzer M (eds) Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture : An Update; Elsevier International Congress Series 1293, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 148–151.Google Scholar
  67. Watson RT, Meira Filho LG, Sanhueza E, Janetos T (1992) Sources and Sinks. In Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK (eds) Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 25–46.Google Scholar
  68. Yurtseven S, Görgülü M (2004) Effects of Grain Sources and Feeding Methods, Free-Choice vs Total Mixed Ration, on Milk Yield and Composition of German Fawn X Hair Crossbred Goats in Mid Lactation. Journal of Animal Feed Science 13(3):417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yurtseven S, Öztürk İ (2008) Influence of Two Sources of Cereals (Corn or Barley), in Free Choice Feeding on Diet Selection, Milk Production Indices and Gaseous Products (CH4 and CO2) in Lactating Sheep. Asian Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances 4(2):76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nazan Koluman (Darcan)
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hasan Rüştü Kutlu
    • 2
  • İnanç Güney
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal ScienceÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal ScienceÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  3. 3.Vocational SchoolÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations