Advertisement

Group Decision Making and Consensual Processes

  • Iván Palomares Carrascosa
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the basic concepts and ideas behind Group Decision Making (GDM) problems under uncertainty, highlighting its core underlying processes—aggregation of information and alternative(s) selection—and preference modeling approaches. Consensus building principles and its numerous related approaches to support accepted group decisions are then introduced in detail. Finally, given the frequent co-occurrence of decision scenarios involving both groups of participants and multiple evaluation criteria, the chapter concludes with an overview of classic Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods.

References

  1. 4.
    Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), pp. 87–96, 1986.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 7.
    M. Behzadian, S.K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, J. Ignatius.: A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 13051–13069, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., Calvo, T.: Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing (reprint), Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), pp. 141–164, 1970.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 10.
    Ben-Arieh, D., Chen. Z.: Linguistic labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision-making using group recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(1), pp. 558–568, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Ben-Arieh, D., Chen, Z.: Linguistic group decision-making: opinion aggregation and measures of consensus. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 5(4), pp. 371–386, 2006.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 14.
    Bordogna, G., Fedrizzi, M., Pasi, G.: A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(1), pp. 126–133, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Bryson, N.: Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process. exploring the consensus-relevant information content. Computers and Operations Research, 23(1), pp. 27–35, 1996.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 16.
    Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Pirlot, M. (Eds.): Decision making process: concepts and methods. Wiley-ISTE, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    Butler, C.T.L., Rothstein, A.: On conflict and consensus: A handbook on formal consensus decision making. Food Not Bombs Publishing (Takoma Park), 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.: A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decision Support Systems, 52, pp. 52–60, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Carlsson, C., Ehrenberg, D., Eklund, P., Fedrizzi, M., Gustafsson, P., Lindholm, P., Merkuryeva, G., Riissanen, T., Ventre, A.G.S.: Consensus in distributed soft environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 61(1–2), pp. 165–185, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    Chen, J.L., Chen, C., Wang, C.C., Jiang, X.: Measuring soft consensus in uncertain linguistic group decision-making based on deviation and overlap degrees. International Journal of Innovative Management, Information & Production, 2(3), pp. 25–33, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    Choo, E.U., William C.W.: A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), pp. 893–908, 2004.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 31.
    Choudhury, A.K., Shankar, R., Tiwari, M.K.: Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), pp. 1776–1799, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    Dong, Y., Xu, J.: Consensus building in group decision making - searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 36.
    Dong, Y., Zhang, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decision Support Systems, 84, pp. 1–15, 2016.Google Scholar
  18. 38.
    Dong, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, H., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, In press.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2818078.Google Scholar
  19. 41.
    Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 42.
    Dymova, L, Savastjanov, P., Tikhonenko, A.: A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, pp. 4841–4847, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 47.
    García-Alcaraz, J.L., Martínez-Loya, V., Díaz-Reza, R., Avelar, L., Canales, I.: A multicriteria decision support system framework for computer selection. In R. Valencia-García et al. (Eds.): Exploring Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Studies in Computational Intelligence, 764, pp. 89–110, 2018.Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    Gong, Z.W., Forrest, J., Yang, Y.J.: The optimal group consensus models for 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Knowledge-based systems, 37, pp. 427–437, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    González-Artega, T., de Andrés, R., Chiclana, F.: A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations. Knowledge-based Systems, 107(C), pp. 104–116, 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 54.
    Hansson, S.O.: Decision Theory: A brief introduction. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 2005.Google Scholar
  25. 55.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(2), pp. 175–190, 1996.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 56.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78(1), pp. 73–87, 1996.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 57.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 16(3–4), pp. 309–334, 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 58.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 88(1), pp. 31–49, 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 59.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 32(3), pp. 394–402, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 60.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F.: A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(5), pp. 863–877, 2007.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 61.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J.L., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrozny, S. (Eds.): Consensual Processes. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 267, Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
  32. 62.
    Hirano, K.: Decision Theory in Econometrics. In: Durlauf S.N., Blume L.E. (eds) Microeconometrics. The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010.Google Scholar
  33. 65.
    Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. P.: Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 66.
    Ishizaka, A., Markus L.: How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 14(4), pp. 387–400, 2006.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 67.
    Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18(2), pp. 105–118, 1986.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 68.
    Kacprzyk, J.: On some fuzzy cores and ‘soft’ consensus measures in group decision making. In J. Bezdek (Ed.), The Analysis of Fuzzy Information, pp. 119–130, 1987.Google Scholar
  37. 69.
    Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: A “soft” measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), pp. 316–325, 1988.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 70.
    Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49(1), pp. 21–31, 1992.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 71.
    Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S.: Soft computing and web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Computing, 14(8), pp. 833–846, 2010.Google Scholar
  40. 72.
    Kline, J.A.: Orientation and group consensus. Central States Speech Journal, 23, pp. 44–47, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. 73.
    Khorshid, S.: Soft consensus model based on coincidence between positive and negative ideal degrees of agreement under a group decision-making fuzzy environment. Experts systems with applications, 37(5), pp. 3977–3985, 2010.Google Scholar
  42. 76.
    Lai, S.K.: A preference-based interpretation of AHP. Omega, 23, pp. 453–462, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. 79.
    Lin, C.-C.: A revised framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 176 (2), pp. 1145–1150, 2007.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 81.
    Liu, B., Shen, Y., Chen, X., Sun, H., Chen, Y.: A complex multi-attribute large-group PLS decision-making method in the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, pp. 4512–4527, 2014.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 88.
    Liu, Y., Liang, C., Chiclana, F., Wu, J.: A trust induced recommendation mechanism for reaching consensus in group decision making. Knowledge-based Systems, 119, pp. 221–231, 2017.Google Scholar
  46. 93.
    Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D., Wu, F.: Multi-objective group decision making - methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. World Scientific Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 6, 2007.Google Scholar
  47. 94.
    Martinez, L., Montero, J.: Challenges for improving consensus reaching process in collective decisions. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 3(2), pp. 203–217, 2007.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 95.
    Martinez, L, Herrera, F.: An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges. Information Sciences, 207, pp. 1–18, 2012.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. 96.
    Mata, F., Martinez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E.: An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(2), pp. 279–290, 2009.Google Scholar
  50. 97.
    Mendel, J., John, R.I.B.: Type-2 Fuzzy Sets made Simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(2), pp. 117–127, 2002.Google Scholar
  51. 99.
    Orlovsky, S.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(3), 155–167.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 100.
    Palomares, I., Sánchez, P., Quesada, F., Mata, F., Martínez, L.: COMAS - A multi-agent system for performing consensus processes. In Abraham, A. et al. (Eds.): Procs. International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI 2011). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 91, pp. 125–132, Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
  53. 101.
    Palomares, I., Liu, J., Xu, Y., Martínez, L.: Modelling experts’ attitudes in group decision making. Soft Computing, 16(10), pp. 1755–1766, 2012.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 103.
    Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context - taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information fusion, 20, pp. 252–271, 2014.Google Scholar
  55. 104.
    Palomares, I., Martinez, L.: A semisupervised multiagent system model to support consensus-reaching processes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), pp. 762–777, 2014.Google Scholar
  56. 105.
    Palomares, I., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: A consensus model to detect and manage non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), pp. 516–530, 2014.Google Scholar
  57. 108.
    Palomares, I.: Multi-agent System to model consensus processes in large-scale group decision making using soft computing techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Jaén (Spain), 2014.Google Scholar
  58. 109.
    Quesada, F., Palomares, I., Martínez, L.: Managing experts behavior in large-scale consensus reaching processes with uninorm aggregation operators. Applied Soft Computing, 35, pp. 873–887, 2015.Google Scholar
  59. 111.
    Palomares, I., Sellak, H., Ouhbi, B., Frikh, B.: Adaptive, Semi-Supervised Consensus Model for Multi-Criteria Large Group Decision Making in a Linguistic Setting. In ISKE 2017 Proceedings: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, 2017.Google Scholar
  60. 113.
    Parreiras, R.O., Ekel, P., Bernardes, A.: A dynamic consensus scheme based on a nonreciprocal fuzzy preference relation modeling. Information Sciences, 211(1), pp. 1–17, 2012.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  61. 114.
    Parreiras, R.O., Ekel, P., Bernardes, A.: A dynamic consensus scheme based on a nonreciprocal fuzzy preference relation modeling. Information Sciences, 211(1), pp. 1–17, 2012.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 115.
    Peterson, M.: An Introduction to Decision Theory (Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy). Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  63. 118.
    Roubens, M.: Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 90(2), pp. 199–206, 1997.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 120.
    Russo, R.D.F.S.M., Camanho, R.: Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, pp. 1123–1132, Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
  65. 121.
    Saaty, T.L.: Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, pp. 426–447, 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 124.
    Saaty, Thomas L. “The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority.” Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, USA (1980).Google Scholar
  67. 125.
    Saaty, Thomas L. “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” International journal of services sciences 1.1 (2008): 83–98.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. 126.
    Saint, S., Lawson, J.R.: Rules for reaching consensus. A modern approach to decision making. Jossey-Bass, 1994.Google Scholar
  69. 127.
    Spillman, B., Bezdek, J., Spillman, R.: Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus. Communication Monographs, 46(1), pp. 1–12, 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. 133.
    Sorin, N., Dzitac, S., Dzitax, I.: Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Procedia Computer Science, pp. 823–831, Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
  71. 137.
    Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2), pp. 117–131, 1984.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 143.
    Tocqueville, A.: Democracy in America (2nd Ed.). Saunders and Otley (London), 1840.Google Scholar
  73. 144.
    Torra, V.: Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), pp. 529–539, 2010.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 145.
    Torra, V., Mesiar, R., Baets, B.: Aggregation functions in theory and practice. Springer Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Proceedings AGOP 2017), Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
  75. 150.
    Wu, Z., Xu, J.: A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), pp. 757–767, 2012.Google Scholar
  76. 151.
    Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Applied Soft Computing, 35, pp. 827–839, 2015.Google Scholar
  77. 156.
    Xia, M., Xu, Z., Chen, J.: Algorithms for improving consistency or consensus of reciprocal [0,1]-valued preference relations. Fuzzy sets and systems, 216(Spec. Iss.), pp. 108–133, 2013.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  78. 157.
    Xia, M., Xu, Z., Chen, N.: Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making. Group Decision and Negotiation. 22(2), pp. 259–279, 2013.Google Scholar
  79. 160.
    Xu, Z.: An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), pp. 1369–1374, 2009.Google Scholar
  80. 170.
    Yager, R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 18(1), pp. 183–190, 1988.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. 171.
    Yager, R., Rybalov, A.: Uninorm aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 80, pp. 111–120, 1996.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. 172.
    Yager, R., Filev, D.: Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 29, pp. 141–150, 1999.Google Scholar
  83. 173.
    Yager, R.: Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 9(3), pp. 393–403, 2001.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  84. 176.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), pp. 338–353. 1965.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 177.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I. Information Sciences, 8(3), pp. 199–249, 1975.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  86. 179.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - II. Information Sciences, 9(1), pp. 43–80, 1975.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. 180.
    Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computing and Mathematics with Applications, 9(1), pp. 149–184, 1983.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. 183.
    Zeleny, M.: A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Computers & Operations Research, 1(3–4), pp. 379–396, 1974.Google Scholar
  89. 184.
    Zhang, G., Dong, Y., Xu, Y., Li, H.: Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(6), pp. 1253–1261, 2011.Google Scholar
  90. 195.
    Zulueta, Y., Martínez-Moreno, J., Bello, R., Martínez, L.: A discrete time variable index for supporting dynamic multi-criteria decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 22, pp. 1–22, 2014.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iván Palomares Carrascosa
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science (SCEEM)University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations