Advertisement

Picking Up the PACE: Proficiency Assessment for Curricular Enhancement

  • Dan SonesonEmail author
  • Elaine E. Tarone
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 37)

Abstract

This chapter describes a project at the University of Minnesota designed to improve the quality of language learning and teaching in seven different language programs through articulated coordination of three ongoing activities: annual administration of ACTFL proficiency tests of reading, speaking and listening to students at several points in the curriculum; a professional development (PD) program conducted by and for instructors of all languages, engaging them in exploratory practice to help students achieve higher proficiency outcomes; and a systematic program of proficiency-based self-assessment for undergraduate language students.

In this chapter, we provide details on each of these three initiatives all working together to raise the level of students’ language proficiency. First, we analyze the proficiency assessment results of 1477 students enrolled in years 1–4 in seven language programs over the course of 2 years. Second, we describe a program of professional development for instructors that is conducted by and for instructors of all languages, the goal of which is to fine-tune instructors’ delivery of the curriculum – to adjust their pedagogy and use of curricular materials to enable students to achieve higher proficiency outcomes. Finally, we provide an overview of a proficiency-based self-assessment measure for students to engage them in their own proficiency development.

Keywords

Assessment Professional development Self-assessment Proficiency Flagship Curriculum enhancement 

References

  1. ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. Available from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
  2. Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E., & Troyan, F. (2013). Implementing Integrated Performance Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
  3. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, J., Lange, D., & Wakefield, R. (1986). Strengthening the language requirement at the University of Minnesota: An initial report. Foreign Language Annals, 19(2), 149–156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1986.tb03110.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes-Karol, G., & Broner, M. (2010). Using images as springboards to teach cultural perspectives in light of the ideals of the MLA Report. Foreign Language Annals, 43(3), 422–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01091.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA). (2002). Manual for MLPA administration. Minneapolis, MN: CARLA.Google Scholar
  7. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA). (2017). History of the MLPA [Minnesota Language Proficiency Assessments]. Retrieved March 14, 2017 from http://carla.umn.edu/assessment/MLPA.html
  8. Chalhoub-Deville, M. (1997). The Minnesota articulation project and its proficiency-based assessments. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 492–502.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb00856.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clifford, R., & Cox, T. (2013). Empirical validation of reading proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox, T., & Clifford, R. (2014). Empirical validation of listening proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 379–403.  https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson, D. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 6–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01057.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eden, M. (1998). German at the University of Minnesota: A case for articulation and accountability in a proficiency-based system. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Graves, K. (2000). Developing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  14. Lange, D. (1988). Some implications for curriculum and instruction for foreign language education as derived from the ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 21(1), 41–50.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3530743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lange, D., Prior, P., & Sims, W. (1992). Prior instruction, equivalency formulas, and functional proficiency: Examining the problem of secondary school-college articulation. The Modern Language Journal, 76(3), 284–294.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb06998.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lange, D. L., & Lowe, P. (1987). Grading reading passages according to the ACTFL/ETS/ILR reading proficiency standard: Can it be learned? Selected Papers From the 1986 Language Testing Research Colloquium (pp. 111–127). Monterey, CA: Defense Language Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Liskin-Gasparro, J., Wunnava, P., & Henry, K. (1991). The effect of intensive-immersive conditions on the acquisition and development of oral proficiency in Spanish and Russian. (Grant No. P017A80033). Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Language Schools.Google Scholar
  18. McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–349.  https://doi.org/10.1191/026553201682430076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Metcalf, M. (1995). Articulating the teaching of foreign languages: The Minnesota Project. ADFL Bulletin, 26, 52–54.  https://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.26.3.52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rifkin, B. (2005). A ceiling effect in traditional foreign language instruction: Data from Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00262.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tarone, E., & Allwright, D. (2005). Language teacher-learning and student language-learning: Shaping the knowledge base. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (5-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Tarone, E., & Lentz, U. (2008). Student performance: When the proficiency test becomes optional. Presentation at the annual conference of the American Association of Teachers of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  23. Tarone, E., Lentz, U., & Eden-Frahm, M. (2009). Student performance: When the proficiency test becomes optional. Presentation at the annual conference of the Minnesota Council of Teachers of Languages and Cultures (MCTLC), Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  24. Tedick, D. J. (Ed.). (1998). Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. Revised and updated, January 2002. Available online at: http://www.carla.umn.edu/articulation/handbook.html
  25. Tedick, D. J. (2002). Background information. In Proficiency language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. Available online at: http://carla.umn.edu/articulation/background.html
  26. The Language Flagship (2014). Request for proposal: The Language Flagship proficiency initiative application guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.thelanguageflagship.org/sites/default/files/Flagship%20Proficiency%20Initiative%20_%202014_0.pdf
  27. The Language Flagship (2017). The Language Flagship: Creating global professionals. Retrieved 10 June 2017 from https://www.thelanguageflagship.org/
  28. Tschirner, E. (2016). Listening and reading proficiency levels of college students. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 201–223.  https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Minnesota Language CenterMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations