Advertisement

Language Instructors Learning Together: Using Lesson Study in Higher Education

  • Beth DillardEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 37)

Abstract

The post 9/11 context brought a heightened awareness of the critical need to develop translingual and transcultural competence in language learners. This chapter takes up the question of what role—and what form—professional development for language instructors can take in the overall task of increasing students’ language proficiency levels. It details a qualitative, interventionist study which examined how participation in an inquiry group mediated the conceptual development of three world language instructors in higher education. The study is framed by both activity theory, which informs an understanding of the inquiry group’s situatedness in their sociocultural-historical context, and microinteractional analysis, which allows a view into how the turn-by-turn construction of meaning in the inquiry group created affordances for teacher inquiry. The findings of this study support the view that a combination of periodic workshops and sustained instructional inquiry groups can be particularly effective in promoting teacher conceptual development.

Keywords

Professional development Inquiry group Lesson study Developmental work research Activity theory Higher education World language Microinteractional analysis Proficiency Teacher learning 

References

  1. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Engeström, Y. (2009). Expansive learning: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 53–73). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernandez, C., & Chokshi, S. (2002). A practical guide to translating lesson study for a U.S. setting. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 128–134.  https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. Modern Language Journal, 98, 654–657.  https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guerrettaz, A., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259.Google Scholar
  10. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.  https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. (2011). A Sociocultural theoretical perspective on teacher professional development. In K. E. Johnson & P. Golombek (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on professional development (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, C. C. (2006). Lesson study in North America: Progress and challenges. In M. Matoba, K. A. Crawford, & M. R. Sarkar Arani (Eds.), Lesson study international perspective on policy and practice. Beijing, China: Educational Science Publishing House.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, C. C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, C., & Scharber, C. (2012). Activity System Observation Protocol (ASOP). Bright Stars: Technology-mediated settings for urban youth as pathways for engaged learning. Research proposal submitted to the W.T. Grant Foundation (funded).Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, C. C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river. American Educator, 22(4), 12–17, 50–52. Retrieved from: https://ncetm.org.uk/public/files/34863/swift+flowing+river.pdf.
  17. Liddicoat, A. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. New York, NY: Continuum.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12024_4.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  19. MLA ad hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession, 234–245.  https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.234.
  20. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.  https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(01), 1–63.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Tasker, T. (2014). Exploring EFL teacher professional development through lesson study: An activity theoretical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  25. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: A case study of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago, Department of Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Woodring College of EducationWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations