Advertisement

Where Am I? Where Am I Going, and How Do I Get There?: Increasing Learner Agency Through Large-Scale Self Assessment in Language Learning

  • Gabriela SweetEmail author
  • Sara Mack
  • Anna Olivero-Agney
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 37)

Abstract

This chapter explores the efficacy of Basic Outcomes Student Self Assessment (BOSSA), a fully integrated standardized second language self-assessment protocol. Designed for large-scale, sustainable use across languages, levels, and modalities, BOSSA supports learner awareness as a path to agency and empowerment.

BOSSA shifts the focus from the traditional teacher as center of knowledge (the only one who evaluates) to a learner-centered space where the students work in community to actively support and develop their language skills. The collaboratively created protocol was validated through piloting over several semesters, operationalizing self assessment at the University of Minnesota and transforming the language classroom experience for more than 10,000 students in ten languages.

Incorporating qualitative data from focus groups with students and instructors as well as quantitative data from student-reported benefit and self-assessment surveys, researchers found that a self-assessment protocol that pairs a proximal performance opportunity with training and practice with self assessment can successfully support learners, instructors, and language programs in large-scale contexts. In addition, it provides a workable response to the increasing calls for integrating research-driven practice and transdisciplinary approaches as essential elements of second language teaching and learning.

Keywords

Standardized learner-centered reflection protocol Integrated performance tasks Accuracy in self evaluation Learner awareness Transdisciplinary approach Active learning Empowerment Cross-language applicability Sustainable use 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the many instructors, students, and staff of the University of Minnesota who contributed to this project. We are also grateful to the reviewers of this chapter for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. ACTFL. (2012a). ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf
  2. ACTFL. (2012b). NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do statements: Progress indicators for language learners. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/ncssfl-actfl-can-do-statements
  3. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ash, S., & Clayton, P. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, D., Byrnes, H., Doran, M., Duff, P., Ellis, N. C., Hall, J. K., … Norton, B. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The M odern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, N. A., Dewey, D. P., & Cox, T. L. (2014). Assessing the validity of can-do statements in retrospective (then-now) self-assessment. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2006). On-task versus off-task self-assessments among Korean elementary school students studying English. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 506–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, I. (2007). Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Statistics in Medicine, 26(19), 3661–3675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey, D., Bown, J., & Dennis, E. (2012). Japanese language proficiency, social networking, and language use during study abroad: Learners’ perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolosic, H. N., Brantmeier, C., Strube, M., & Hogrebe, M. C. (2016). Living Language: Self-Assessment, Oral Production, and Domestic Immersion. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duff, P. (2013). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 428–444). Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Grant, C., & Zwier, E. (2011). Intersectionality and student outcomes: Sharpening the struggle against racism, sexism, classism, ableism, heterosexism, nationalism, and linguistic, religious, and geographical discrimination in teaching and learning. Multicultural perspectives, 13(4), 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jankowski, N. A. (2017). Unpacking relationships: Instruction and student outcomes. American Council on Education.Retrieved February 3, 2017, from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/Unpacking-Relationships-Instruction-and-Student-Outcomes.aspx
  15. Lappin-Fortin, K., & Rye, B. J. (2014). The use of pre-/posttest and self-assessment tools in a French pronunciation course. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 300–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LeBlanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-assessment as a second language placement instrument. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Livecode Ltd. (1997). LiveCode [Computer software]. Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Mack, S., Sweet, G., Olivero-Agney, A., Peltonen, J., & Rackowski, D. (2015). “Yes, you can!”: Self-assessment in the hybrid romance language classroom. Presentation made at the Modern Language Association International Meeting, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  19. Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta–analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language learning, 53(1), 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Multimedia Learning Center, Judd, A., & Marjorie. (2005–2008). DiLL the digital language lab [Computer software]. Evanston, IL: Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences at Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  21. Nielsen, K. (2014). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Regents of the University of Minnesota. (2016). BOSSA: Welcome [video]. Available at http://languagecenter.cla.umn.edu/boss/welcome.php.
  23. Stansfield, C. W., Gao, J., & Rivers, W. P. (2010). A Concurrent Validity Study of Self-Assessments and the Federal Interagency Language Roundtable Oral Proficiency Interview. Russian Language Journal/Русский язык , 60, 299–315.Google Scholar
  24. Sweet, G., Mack, S., & Olivero-Agney, A. (2017). Self assessment in language courses: Does in-class support make a difference? In I. Alexander & R. Poch (Eds.), Innovative learning and teaching: Experiments across the disciplines (pp. 94–103). Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  25. Ziegler, N. A. (2014). Fostering self-regulated learning through the European language portfolio: An embedded mixed methods study. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 921–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ziegler, N. A., & Moeller, A. J. (2012). Increasing self-regulated learning through the LinguaFolio. Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Sweet
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara Mack
    • 2
  • Anna Olivero-Agney
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Spanish & Portuguese StudiesUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Italian Cultural CenterMinneapolis/St. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations