Advertisement

Uncertainty and Risk at the Catastrophe Threshold

  • Mark BosloughEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Space and Society book series (SPSO)

Abstract

The planetary defense enterprise is justified by a cost/benefit analysis comparing long-term average losses from unmitigated NEO impacts to the expense of preventing them. Probabilistic risk assessment is used because the risk is dominated by NEOs that have not yet been discovered and are on unknown trajectories. The number of lives saved has historically quantified the benefit side, but there is no unambiguous means to compare this quantity to the monetary cost of planetary defense. Nevertheless, it is a useful metric for intercomparison of various risk-reduction strategies. There is a power-law distribution of NEO sizes, and the consequences are a strong function of size with a presumed threshold for global catastrophe. Therefore, the most cost-effective means for reducing risk has been to focus first on surveys designed to discover asteroids large enough to exceed the catastrophe threshold. The possibility of a NEO-caused global catastrophe has nearly been eliminated, reducing the overall assessed risk by an order of magnitude so far. Eliminating the remaining risk will be more difficult and the returned benefit will be smaller. Barring the discovery of an asteroid on a collision course, at some point the planetary defense cost will no longer be justified by the marginal benefit.

Keywords

Hazard Risk Uncertainty quantification Global catastrophe Catastrophe threshold Kill curve 

References

  1. Boslough, M., Barbara Jennings, Carvey, B., & Fogleman, W. (2015a). FEMA asteroid impact tabletop exercise simulations. In Proceedings of the 13th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877705815006815/1-s2.0-S1877705815006815-main.pdf
  2. Boslough, M., Brown, P., & Harris, A. (2015b). Updated population and risk assessment for airbursts from near-earth objects (NEOs). In 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference (Vol. 2015–June, pp. 1–12). Big Sky, MT: IEEE. doi:10.1109/AERO.2015.7119288Google Scholar
  3. Boslough, M., Chodas, P., Ezzedine, S., Jennings, B., & Fogleman, B. (2016). Physical and infrastructure modeling for the 2015 PDC asteroid threat exercise. In Aerospace Conference, 2016 IEEE (pp. 1–18). IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013). Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama? Global environmental change, 23(1), 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman, C. R., & Morrison, D. (1994). Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: assessing the hazard. Nature, 367(6458), 33–40. doi:10.1038/367033a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Israelian, G., Eichler, D., & May, B. (Eds.). (2016). Starmus: Origins of the Cosmos. Tenerife, Spain.Google Scholar
  7. Mathias, D. L., Wheeler, L. F., & Dotson, J. L. (2017). A probabilistic asteroid impact risk model: assessment of sub-300 m impacts. Icarus, 289, 106–119. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McKie, R. (2015). Asteroid Day tries to save life as we know it | Science | The Guardian. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/13/asteroid-day-anniversary-tunguska-siberia. Accessed 7 April 2018
  9. Reinhardt, J. C., Chen, X., Liu, W., Manchev, P., & Paté-Cornell, M. E. (2016). Asteroid Risk Assessment: A Probabilistic Approach. Risk Analysis, 36(2), 244–261. doi:10.1111/risa.12453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rumpf, C. M., Lewis, H. G., & Atkinson, P. M. (2017). Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(8), 3433–3440. doi:10.1002/2017GL073191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stokes, G. H., Barbee, B. W., Bottke, W. F., Buie, M. W., Chesley, S. R., Chodas, P. W., et al. (2017). Update to determine the feasibility of enhancing the search and characterization of NEOs. In Technical Report. Prepared by the Near-Earth Object Science Definition Team at the request of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2017_neo_sdt_final_e-version.pdf
  12. Toon, O. B., Zahnle, K., Morrison, D., Turco, R. P., & Covey, C. (1997). Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets. Reviews of Geophysics, 35(1), 41–78. doi:10.1029/96RG03038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weissman, P. (1994). The comet and asteroid impact hazard in perspective. In T. Gehrels (Ed.), Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids (pp. 1191–1212). University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations