Advertisement

Income Taxation

  • Burkhard Heer
Chapter
Part of the Springer Texts in Business and Economics book series (STBE)

Abstract

After a brief survey of the empirical findings on income taxation in the US and German economies in Sect. 5.2, you learn about the substantial welfare costs that are associated with the taxation of labor income. In Sect. 5.3, these costs are computed in both partial and general equilibrium. As one result, the deadweight loss of labor income taxation in Germany is found to be twice as high as the one in the US. In Sect. 5.4, the seminal result from optimal taxation that capital income should not be taxed in the long run is derived and discussed critically. Section 5.5 estimates the US Laffer curve and shows that the US government, in contrast to many European governments, can still raise its revenues from labor and capital income taxation by approximately 10% of GDP. In Sect. 5.6, the quantitative effects of higher taxes on economic growth are derived in a Dynamic General Equilibrium (DGE) model and are shown to be substantially higher than those typically found in growth regressions. Finally, we demonstrate that stochastic taxes improve the time series properties of the real business cycle (RBC) model with respect to the volatility of aggregate demand components and the dynamics of labor and wages in Sect. 5.7.

References

  1. Arnold, J. (2008). Do tax structures affect aggregate economic growth? Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries (OECD Economics Department working papers, 643).Google Scholar
  2. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Budría Rodriguez, S., Díaz-Giménez, J., & Quadrini, V. (2002). Updated facts on the U.S. distributions of earnings, income, and wealth. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 26, 2–35.Google Scholar
  6. Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Labor hoarding and the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Fisher, J. D. M. (2004). Fiscal shocks and their consequences. Journal of Economic Theory, 115, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty, I., Holter, H. A., & Stepanchuk, S. (2015). Marriage stability, taxation and aggregate labor supply in U.S. vs. Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 72(C), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamley, C. (1986). Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives. Econometrica, 54, 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., & Weber, A. (2011). Are micro and macro labor supply elasticities consistent? A review of evidence on the intensive and extensive margins. American Economic Review, 101(1), 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conesa, J. C., & Krueger, D. (2006). On the optimal progressivity of the income tax code. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 1425–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Erasmo, P., Mendoza, E. G., & Zhang, J. (2016). What is a sustainable public debt? In J. B. Taylor & H. Uhlig (Eds.), Handbook of the macroeconomics (pp. 2493–2597). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Di Sanzo, S., Bella, M., & Graziano, G. (2017). Tax structure and economic growth: A panel cointegrated VAR analysis. Italian Economic Review, 3, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Domeij, D., & Heathcote, J. (2004). On the distribution effects of reducing capital taxes. International Economic Review, 45(2), 523–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easterly, W., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 417–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer, S. (1980). Dynamic inconsistency, cooperation and the benevolent dissembling government. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomme, P., Ravikumar, B., & Rupert, P. (2011). The return to capital and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 14, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grüner, H.-P., & Heer, B. (2000). Optimal flat-rate taxes on capital – A re-examination of Lucas’ supply-side model. Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heer, B., & Trede, M. (2003). Efficiency and distribution effects of a revenue-neutral income tax reform. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irmen, A., & Kuehnel, J. (2009). Productive government expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(4), 692–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judd, K. L. (1985). Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect-foresight model. Journal of Public Economics, 28, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keuschnigg, C. (2005). Öffentliche Finanzen: Einnahmenpolitik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  23. Kocherlakota, N. R. (2010). The new dynamic public finance. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth models. American Economic Review, 82, 942–963.Google Scholar
  26. Lucas, R. E. (1990). Supply-side economics: An analytical review. Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGrattan, E. R. (1994). The macroeconomic effects of distortionary taxation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33, 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendoza, E. G., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., & Asea, P. (1997). On the ineffectiveness of tax policy in altering long-run growth: Harberger’s superneutrality conjecture. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mertens, K., & Ravn, M. O. (2011). Understanding the aggregate effects of anticipated and unanticipated tax policy shocks. Review of Economic Dynamics, 14, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prescott, E. C. (2004). Why do Americans work so much more than Europeans? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 28, 2–13.Google Scholar
  31. Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turnovsky, S. J. (1996). Optimal tax, debt, and expenditures policies in a growing economy. Journal of Public Economics, 60, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wickens, M. R. (2011). Macroeconomic theory – A dynamic general equilibrium approach (2nd ed.). Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burkhard Heer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business and EconomicsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations