Medicolegal Aspects in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery

  • Isabela Drăghici
  • Liviu Drăghici


In recent years, a special aspect of medicine called “medicolegal aspects” has emerged and surprisingly developed. In pediatric surgery, this branch is more sensitive because of the patient whose life expectancy must be as close as 100%. No one will ever come to terms with the idea that for a child no matter how sick he is, “nothing can be done.”


  1. 1.
    Raveesh BN, Nayak RB, Kumbar SF, Raveesh BN. Preventing medico-legal issues in clinical practice. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016;19(Suppl 1):S15–20. PMCID: PMC5109754, PMID: 27891020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meng MV, Hsieh MH. Medicolegal aspects of minimally invasive urologic surgery. In: Ghavamian R, editor. Complications of laparoscopic and robotic urologic surgery. New York: © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC; 2010. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panta LS. Supreme Court of India. Kirplani & Ors. 2009. Last cited on 14 Sept 2016.
  4. 4.
    Oyebode F. Clinical errors and medical negligence. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22:323–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kreimer S. Six ways physicians can prevent patient injury and avoid lawsuits, medical economics. Last updated on 10 Dec 2013; Last cited on 5 Sept 2016.
  6. 6.
    Hagihara A, Tarumi K. Association between physicians’ communicative behaviors and judges’ decisions in lawsuits on negligent care. Health Policy. 2007;83:213–22. [PubMed].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hickson GB, Federspiel CF, Pichert JW, Miller CS, Gauld-Jaeger J, Bost P. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002;287:2951–7. [PubMed].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hurwitz B. How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence? BMJ. 2004;329:1024–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies J. Clinical guidelines as a tool for legal liability. An international perspective. Med Law. 2009;28:603–13. [PubMed].PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flynn M. Medical malpractice—medicolegal perspectives: negligence, standard of care. In: Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. 2nd ed. Sydney: Elsevier; 2016. p. 365–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chervenak J, LB MC, Chervenak FA. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):586–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubin EB, Bernat JL. Consent issues in neurology. Neurol Clin. 2010;28:459–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McLean TR. Risk management observations from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2006;141:643–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kern KA. Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1997;132:392–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kienzle HF. Malpractice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of cases recently considered by the Expert Commission. Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124:535–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Reuver PR, Wind J, Cremers JE, et al. Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Esposito C, Escolino M, Bailez M, Rothenberg S, Davenport M, Saxena A, Caldamone A, Szavay P, Philippe P, Till H, Montupet P, Holcomb Rd GW. Malpractice in paediatric minimally invasive surgery—a current concept: results of an international survey. Med Sci Law. 2017;57(4):197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabela Drăghici
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liviu Drăghici
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”BucharestRomania
  2. 2.Pediatric Surgery DepartmentEmergency Hospital for Children “Maria Sklodowska Curie”BucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations