Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginoplasty

  • Maria Marcela Bailez


Providing its excellent visualization, access to pelvic structures, and less postoperative adhesions, laparoscopy has been an important tool for the treatment of uterovaginal anomalies. We have used it to define the anomaly, monitor endometriosis or a hysteroscopic procedure, replace an absent vagina, and resect abnormal Mullerian structures.


  1. 1.
    Bailez M. Advanced endoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;16(4):278–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:867–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tjaden BL, Rock J. Uterovaginal anomalies. In: Carpenter SE, Rock J, editors. Pediatric and adolescent gynecology, vol. 20. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p. 313–30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strickland JL, Cameron WJ, Krantz KE, et al. Long-term satisfaction of adults undergoing McIndoe vaginoplasty as adolescents. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1993;6:135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muran D, Frederick R, Shell D. Modified Williams vulvovaginoplasty: the role of tissue expanders. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1992;5:81–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samuelson M, Baker L. Autologous buccal mucosa vulvovaginoplasty for high urogenital sinus. J Pediatr Urol. 2006;2(5):486–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pratt JH. Vaginal atresia corrected by use of small and large bowel. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1972;15:639–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bailez M, Heinen F, Solana J. Absent vagina in patients with anorectal anomalies. BJU. 1998;81:76.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giovanni B, Zaffaroni G, Milena D, et al. Proctoperineovaginohysterstomy and sigmoid colon pull-through for vaginal agenesis, hematocervicometra and vestibular anus. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1993;6:95–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hendren H. Management of cloacal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1997;6:217–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peña A. Atlas of surgical management of anorectal malformations. New York: Springer Verlag; 1990. p. 19.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rock JA, Sclaff WD. The obstetrical consequences of uterovaginal anomalies. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:681–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novak F, Kos L, Plesko F. The advantages of the artificial vagina derived from sigmoid colon. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978;57:95–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bailez MM, Scherl H, Dibenedetto V, et al. Laparoscopic vaginal replacement with sigmoid colon. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech. 2000;4:90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bailez MM, Dibenedetto V, Elmo G, Korman L. Laparoscopic sigmoid vaginal replacement. What we learned? Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech. 2004;8(4):295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bailez MM. Laparoscopy in uterovaginal anomalies. In: Bax K, Georgeson K, Rothenberg S, Valla JS, Yeung CK, editors. Endoscopic surgery in infants and children. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 791–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McIndoe A. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterate conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg. 1950;2(4):254–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rock JA. The double uterus associated with an obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Marcela Bailez
    • 1
  1. 1.Pediatric Surgery UnitSurgical Department Garrahan Childrens HospitalBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations