End-To-End Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Identification

  • Soheil Esmaeilzadeh
  • Dimitrios Ioannis Belivanis
  • Kilian M. Pohl
  • Ehsan AdeliEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11046)


As shown in computer vision, the power of deep learning lies in automatically learning relevant and powerful features for any perdition task, which is made possible through end-to-end architectures. However, deep learning approaches applied for classifying medical images do not adhere to this architecture as they rely on several pre- and post-processing steps. This shortcoming can be explained by the relatively small number of available labeled subjects, the high dimensionality of neuroimaging data, and difficulties in interpreting the results of deep learning methods. In this paper, we propose a simple 3D Convolutional Neural Networks and exploit its model parameters to tailor the end-to-end architecture for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Our model can diagnose AD with an accuracy of 94.1% on the popular ADNI dataset using only MRI data, which outperforms the previous state-of-the-art. Based on the learned model, we identify the disease biomarkers, the results of which were in accordance with the literature. We further transfer the learned model to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of AD, which yield better results compared to other methods.


  1. 1.
    Adeli, E., Kwon, D., Pohl, K.M.: Multi-label transduction for identification of disease comorbidity patterns. In: MICCAI (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Association, Alzheimer’s: 2017 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimers Dement 13, 325–373 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hosseini-Asl, E., Keynton, R., El-Baz, A.: Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics by adaptation of 3D convolutional network. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 126–130. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jack, C.R., et al.: The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J. Magn. Resonance Imaging 27(4), 685–691 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khajehnejad, M., Saatlou, F.H., Zade, H.M.: Alzheimer’s disease early diagnosis using manifold-based semi-supervised learning. Brain Sci. 7(8), 109 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klöppel, S., et al.: Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 131(3), 681–689 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laakso, M., et al.: Hippocampal volumes in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia, and in vascular dementia an MRI study. Neurology 46(3), 678–681 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Litjens, G., et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60–88 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, M., Zhang, J., Adeli, E., Shen, D.: Deep multi-task multi-channel learning for joint classification and regression of brain status. In: MICCAI (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, M., Zhang, J., Adeli, E., Shen, D.: Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis. Med. Image Anal. 43, 157–168 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, S.M.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suk, H.I., Lee, S.W., Shen, D.: Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage 101, 569–582 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolz, R., Aljabar, P., Hajnal, J.V., Lötjönen, J., Rueckert, D.: Nonlinear dimensionality reduction combining MR imaging with non-imaging information. Med. Image Anal. 16(4), 819–830 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheil Esmaeilzadeh
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Ioannis Belivanis
    • 1
  • Kilian M. Pohl
    • 2
  • Ehsan Adeli
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.SRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations