Advertisement

Graph of Hippocampal Subfields Grading for Alzheimer’s Disease Prediction

  • Kilian Hett
  • Vinh-Thong Ta
  • José V. Manjón
  • Pierrick Coupé
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11046)

Abstract

Numerous methods have been proposed to capture early hippocampus alterations caused by Alzheimer’s disease. Among them, patch-based grading approach showed its capability to capture subtle structural alterations. This framework applied on hippocampus obtains state-of-the-art results for AD detection but is limited for its prediction compared to the same approaches based on whole-brain analysis. We assume that this limitation could come from the fact that hippocampus is a complex structure divided into different subfields. Indeed, it has been shown that AD does not equally impact hippocampal subfields. In this work, we propose a graph-based representation of the hippocampal subfields alterations based on patch-based grading feature. The strength of this approach comes from better modeling of the inter-related alterations through the different hippocampal subfields. Thus, we show that our novel method obtains similar results than state-of-the-art approaches based on whole-brain analysis with improving by 4 percent points of accuracy patch-based grading methods based on hippocampus.

Keywords

Hippocampal subfields Patch-based grading Graph-based method Alzheimer’s disease classification Mild Cognitive Impairment 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study has been carried out with financial support from the French State, managed by the French National Research Agency (ANR) within the project DeepVolbrain and in the frame of the investments for the future program IdEx Bordeaux (HL-MRI ANR-10-IDEX-03-02), Cluster of excellence CPU, TRAIL (BigDataBrain ANR-10-LABX- 57) and the Spanish DPI2017-87743-R grant from the Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad of Spain.

References

  1. 1.
    Avants, et al.: A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage 54(3), 2033–2044 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coupé, P., et al.: Scoring by nonlocal image patch estimator for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage: Clin. 1(1), 141–152 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coupé, et al.: Collaborative patch-based super-resolution for diffusion-weighted images. NeuroImage 83, 245–261 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giraud, et al.: An optimized patchmatch for multi-scale and multi-feature label fusion. NeuroImage 124, 770–782 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hett, K., et al.: Adaptive fusion of texture-based grading: application to Alzheimer’s disease detection. In: International Workshop on Patch-based Techniques in Medical Imaging, pp. 82–89. Springer, Berlin (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kerchner, et al.: Hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy and memory performance in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 63(1), 194–202 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, et al.: Slep: sparse learning with efficient projections. Ariz. State Univ. 6(491), 7 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manjón, et al.: Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31(1), 192–203 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moradi, et al.: Machine learning framework for early MRI-based Alzheimer’s conversion prediction in MCI subjects. NeuroImage 104, 398–412 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Romero, et al.: Hips: a new hippocampus subfield segmentation method. NeuroImage 163, 286–295 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sørensen, L., et al.: Differential diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease using structural MRI cortical thickness, hippocampal shape, hippocampal texture, and volumetry. NeuroImage: Clin. 13, 470–482 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suk, et al.: Deep ensemble learning of sparse regression models for brain disease diagnosis. Med. Image Anal. 37, 101–113 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tong, et al.: Multiple instance learning for classification of dementia in brain MRI. Med. Image Anal. 18(5), 808–818 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tong, et al.: A novel grading biomarker for the prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64(1), 155–165 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    rujillo-Estrada, et al.: Early neuronal loss and axonal/presynaptic damage is associated with accelerated amyloid-\(\beta \) accumulation in a\(\beta \)pp/ps1 Alzheimer’s disease mice subiculum. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 42(2), 521–541 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tustison, et al.: N4 ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(6), 1310–1320 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winterburn, et al.: A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 74, 254–265 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolz, et al.: Multi-method analysis of MRI images in early diagnostics of Alzheimer’s disease. PloS One 6(10), e25446 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kilian Hett
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vinh-Thong Ta
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • José V. Manjón
    • 4
  • Pierrick Coupé
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Univ. Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURATalenceFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURATalenceFrance
  3. 3.Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURAPessacFrance
  4. 4.Universitat Politècnia de València, ITACAValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations