Wearable Technology: Summary

  • Aleksandra Przegalinska


The last chapter is an extended summary that presents results of a study related to the current usages of wearable technologies as well as final conclusions and outline of possible future trends. It is supported by a survey study with mostly open questions covering a range of issues related to practices of self-tracking and how their penetrate individual’s private and professional life. The survey is serving as a tool to envisage changes in the tracking communities and tracker usage and it is a pathway for an analysis of the newest types of tracking and how they contribute to organizational life. It includes kinds of wearable devices used, habits in tracking, reasons for tracking, observed and anticipated dangers, as well as the sense of belonging to a tracking community like Quantified Self. The survey leads to interesting conclusions on how these practices have changed over time and how they may change in the near future.


Survey Study Limitations of tracking Community Quantified Self Transparent Mind Assistive technology 


  1. Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 1992. “On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies.” In Academy of Management Review, 17 (3) (July 1).
  2. Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 2003. Studying Management Critically. Oxford: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Boje, David M., and Robert D. Winsor. 1993. “The Resurrection of Taylorism: Total Quality Management’s Hidden Agenda.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 6 (4): 57–70.Google Scholar
  4. Calvo, R. A., and D. Peters. 2014. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cederström, Carl, and Andre Spicer. 2015. The Wellness Syndrome. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, Michel. 2012. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  7. Katherine Hayles, N. 2008. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Locke, Robert R. 1996. The Collapse of the American Management Mystique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lupton, Deborah. 2016. The Quantified Self. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Lyon, David. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  12. Nafus, Dawn, and Jamie Sherman. 2014. “Big Data, Big Questions| This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice.” International Journal of Communication Systems 8 (June): 11.Google Scholar
  13. Nafus, Dawn, and Karina Tracey. 2002. “Mobile Phone Consumption and Concepts of Personhood.” In Perpetual Contact, edited by James E. Katz and Mark Aakhus, 206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nyland, C. 1996. “Taylorism, John R. Commons, and the Hoxie Report.” Journal of Economic Issues 30 (4): 985–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, Adam. 2018. “All Glassholes Are Revolutionaries.” Wired 26 (5): 29.Google Scholar
  16. Saldanha, Arun. 2003. “Review Essay: Actor-Network Theory and Critical Sociology: Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, Edited by John Law and Annemarie Mol, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience, by John Law, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, by Annemarie Mol, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.” Critical Sociology 29 (3): 419–32.Google Scholar
  17. Scarbrough, Harry, and Gibson Burrell. 1996. “The Axeman Cometh: The Changing Roles and Knowledges of Middle Managers.” In The Politics of Management Knowledge, edited by S. Clegg and G. Palmer, 173–89. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Schor, Juliet. 2016. “Debating the Sharing Economy.” Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics 4 (3): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Srnicek, Nick, and Alex Williams. 2015. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  20. Sundararajan, Arun. 2016. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Vinge, Vernor. 1993. “The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era.” In Proceedings of a Symposium Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering in the Era of CyberSpace, Held at NASA Lewis Research Center (NASA Conference Publication CP-10129).Google Scholar
  22. Yamamura, Kozo. 1976. “The Development of Japanese Business 1600–1973. By Hirschmeier Johannes and Yui Tsunehiko. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1975. Pp. 340. $12.00.” Business History Review 50 (1): 101–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management in Networked and Digital SocietiesKozminski UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations