Advertisement

Designing the Function of Health Technology Assessment as a Support for Hospital Management

  • Gabriele PalozziEmail author
  • Camilla Falivena
  • Antonio Chirico
Chapter

Abstract

Investment in Health Technologies (HTs) is one of the crucial points for hospital managers. It affects the goals and strategic orientation of the whole Health Organization. Decision-making regarding the employment of new technologies involves, prevalently, the hospital level, which directly concerns the healthcare delivery process and its design.

Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA) is aimed at selecting the portfolio of new HTs that provides the best balance between competing targets, namely, cost containment and quality improvement. This objective is achievable by thinking about how to improve the service delivered, through the use of innovative cost-effective HT.

Accordingly, the HTA role deals with the operational modalities of hospital departments, and it is strictly related to outcomes desired and in respect to budgets.

This evaluative process should be coherent with specific health organization necessities given that each one is concerned with its own geographic area, its own specific patients’ epidemiology, the social environment, and financial resources’ availability. However, HTA is usually run by practitioners whose competences contemplate mainly clinical and technical aspects; hence, the absence of a focus on performance management (PM) represents the main weakness of this function.

Thus, starting from the current body of literature in the fields of PM and HT management, this work theoretically identifies how to design an HB-HTA function and which the main relevant evaluation perspectives are. By explaining the implementation stages, it will be shown how HTA at the hospital level should be able to combine the different perspectives of business performance (financial and nonfinancial) with clinical needs.

References

  1. Aidemark, L. G. (2001). The meaning of BSC in the health care organisation. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Mueller, J. M. (2005). The effects of experience and data presentation format on an auditing judgment. Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(1), 53–63.Google Scholar
  3. Battista, R. (1994). Scienze della salute, decisioni politiche e valutazione delle tecnologie sanitarie: sta espandendosi il ruolo degli epidemiologi? Epidemiology Review, 18, 15–21.Google Scholar
  4. Blancquaert, I. (2006). Managing partnerships and impact on decision-making: The example of health technology assessment in genetics. Community Genetics, 9(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  5. Choong, K. (2013). Understanding the features of performance measurement system: A literature review. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(4), 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cicchetti, A., Marchetti, M., Dibidino, R., & Corio, M. (2008) Hospital based health technology assessment world-wide survey. Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment Sub-interest Group. Accessed October 17, 2018, from https://htai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/HospitalBasedHTAISGSurveyReport.pdf
  7. Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogheri, P., & Bondanelli, L. (2010). Il bilancio dell’intangibile. Quando in azienda i conti non contano abbastanza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  9. Fulop, N., Allen, P., Clarke, A., & Black, N. (2003). From health technology assessment to research on the organisation and delivery of health services: Addressing the balance. Health Policy, 63(2), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghazisaeidi, M., Safdari, R., Torabi, M., Mirzaee, M., Farzi, J., & Goodini, A. (2015). Development of performance dashboards in healthcare sector: Key practical issues. Acta Informatica Medica, 23(5), 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grigoroudis, E., Orfanoudaki, E., & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega, 4, 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gröne, O., & Garcia-Barbero, M. (2001). Integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 1(2).Google Scholar
  13. Gurd, B., & Gao, T. (2007). Lives in the balance: An analysis of the balanced scorecard (BSC) in healthcare organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(1), 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haworth, J. (2008). Measuring performance. Nursing Management, 15, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonsson, E., & Banta, H. D. (1999). Management of health technologies: An international view. British Medical Journal, 319, 1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Karra, E. D., & Papadopoulos, D. L. (2005). Measuring performance of Theagenion hospital through a balanced scorecard. Operational Research: An International Journal, 5, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, S. (2009). Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kocakülâh, M., & Austill, A. D. (2007). Balanced scorecard application in the health care industry: A case study. Journal Health Care Finance, 34(1), 72–99.Google Scholar
  20. Lebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business performance measurement: Theory and practice (pp. 65–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovaglio, P. (2010). Model building and estimation strategies for implementing the balanced scorecard in health sector. Quality & Quantity, 45, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martelli, N., Hansen, P., van den Brink, H., Boudard, A., Cordonnier, A. L., Devaux, C., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., & Borget, I. (2016). Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a University Hospital setting. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 59, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martelli, N., Lelong, A. S., Prognon, P., & Pineau, J. (2013). Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in University Hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: Learning from international experience. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 29(2), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miniati, R., Dori, F., Cecconi, G., Gusinu, R., Niccolini, F., & Biffi Gentili, G. (2013). HTA decision support system for sustainable business continuity management in hospitals. The case of surgical activity at the University Hospital in Florence. Technology and Health Care, 21, 49–61.Google Scholar
  25. Miniati, R., Frosini, F., Cecconi, G., Dori, F., & Biffi Gentili, G. (2014). Development of sustainable models for technology evaluation in hospital. Technology and Health Care, 22(5), 729–739.Google Scholar
  26. Oktavia, T. (2014). Implementing a data warehouse as a foundation for decision support system (Perspective: Technical and nontechnical factors). Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 60(3).Google Scholar
  27. Oliveira, J. (2001). The balanced scorecard: An integrative approach to performance evaluation. Healthcare Financial Management, 55(5), 42–46.Google Scholar
  28. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parsons, T. (1964). The social systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Pfannstiel, M. A. (2016). Bayreuth productivity analysis: A method for ascertaining and improving the holistic service productivity of acute care hospitals. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 31(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasche, C., Margaria, T., & Floyd, B. D. (2017). Service model innovation in hospitals: Beyond expert organizations. In M. Pfannstiel & C. Rasche (Eds.), Service business model innovation in healthcare and hospital management (pp. 1–20). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Rasmussen, N. H., Bansal, M., & Chen, C. Y. (2009). Business dashboards: A visual catalog for design and deployment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Read, A., Tarrell, A., & Fruhling, A. (2009). Exploring user preference for the dashboard menu design. In System Sciences. HICSS’09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1–10). IEEE.Google Scholar
  34. Revere, L., Black, K., & Love, D. (2007). An empirical investigation into healthcare performance indicators and the implications for developing a balanced scorecard. In C. A. Mora-Monge (Ed.), Proceedings of the 38th south west decision sciences institute (pp. 505–514). San Diego: DSI.Google Scholar
  35. Reyes-Alcázar, V., Romero-Tabares, A., & Torres-Olivera, A. (2011, October 27–28). Measuring knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning (p. 127). Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  36. Ritrovato, M., Faggiano, F. C., Tedesco, G., & Derrico, P. (2015). Decision-oriented health technology assessment: One step forward in supporting the decision-making process in hospitals. Value in Health,18(4), 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sampietro-Colom, L., Lach, K., Cicchetti, A., Kidholm, K., Pasternack, I., Fure, B., Rosenmöller, M., Wild, C., Kahveci, R., Wasserfallen, J. B, Kiivet, R. A., et al. (2015) The AdHopHTA handbook: A handbook of hospital-based Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA). Public deliverable, The AdHopHTA Project (FP7/2007-13 grant agreement nr 305018).Google Scholar
  38. Sampietro-Colom, L., Morilla-Bachs, I., Gutierrez-Moreno, S., & Gallo, P. (2012). Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(4), 460–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seitz, V., Harvey, C., Ikuma, L., & Nahmens, I. (2014). A case study identifying key performance indicators in public sectors. In IISE Annual Conference Proceedings 2014 (pp. 371–377). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Google Scholar
  40. Silva, P., & Ferreira, A. (2010). Performance management in primary healthcare service: Evidence from a field study. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(4), 424–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sloane, E. B., Liberatore, M. J., Nydick, R. L., Luo, W., & Chung, Q. B. (2003). Using the analytic hierarchy process as a clinical engineering tool to facilitate an iterative, multidisciplinary, microeconomic health technology assessment. Computers & Operations Research, 30(10), 1447–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swinarski, Z. H., Martinot, N., & Morard, B. (2002). Balanced scorecard in a social health care institution. Proceedings of the Academy of Commercial Banking and Finance, 2(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  43. Trochim, W., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Uphoff, M. E., & Krane, D. (1998). Hospital-based health technology assessment: Essential questions and an operational model. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(1), 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urrutia, I., & Eriksen, S. D. (2005). Application of the balanced scorecard in Spanish private health-care management. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(4), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verzola, A., Bentivegna, R., Carandina, G., Trevisani, L., Gregorio, P., & Mandini, A. (2009). Multidimensional evaluation of performance: Experimental application of the balanced scorecard in Ferrara university hospital. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 7(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012). A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Palozzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Camilla Falivena
    • 1
  • Antonio Chirico
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management and LawUniversity Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations