Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP)
Orthognathic surgery has seen many developments and advances throughout its evolutionary history. Recent trends have seen a shift away from traditional model surgery and have sought to embrace more contemporary methods of virtual surgical planning (VSP) . Since its inception, orthognathic surgery has successfully and predictably been planned and performed by means of traditional, analytical model surgery. Introduction of the cone-beam CT in 1998 in Europe and then in the USA in 2001 provoked the beginnings of a paradigm shift [2, 3]. The literature has since been replete with studies focused on providing evidence that virtual surgical planning is as effective and predictable as traditional model surgery [4–6].
KeywordsVirtual surgical planning VSP Orthognathic surgery Temporomandibular joint replacement TMJ Concepts® MedCad® SureSmile®
Special thanks: The authors would like to thank Dr. J. Peter Kierl for the orthodontic component of this case and photographs used in this chapter.
- 1.Hammoudeh JA, Howell LK, Boutros S, Scott MA, Urata MM. Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3D surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(2):e307. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2012;143(8):899–902.Google Scholar
- 10.Bobek S, Farrell B, Choi C, Farrell B, Weimer K, Tucker M. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(6):1143–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.12.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nilsson J, Richards RG, Thor A, Kamer L. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(9):1194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar