Advertisement

Moral Status

  • Matjaž Zwitter
Chapter

Abstract

Assignment of moral status to those concerned is an essential element of every ethical deliberation. Indeed, differences in definition of the moral status of a fertilized human egg cell, of an embryo, of a patient in the terminal phase of an incurable disease or of a laboratory animal are at the roots of ethical disputes. Several criteria for definition of moral status have been proposed, including human properties, cognitive properties, moral agency, sentience, and ability to establish relations. Since none of these criteria adequately covers all dimensions of moral status, only a combination of them will lead to a balanced definition. The question of moral status should not be understood as an all-or-nothing phenomenon, but rather as a gradual acquisition of moral status, depending both on the degree of reflection of the individual and on her/his future potential.

Keywords

Moral status Human properties Cognitive properties Moral agency Sentience 

Reference

  1. 1.
    Singer P. Discussing infanticide. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Berglund C. Ethics for health care. Australia: Oxford University Press; 2012. ISBN: 9780195519570.Google Scholar
  2. Dilley S, Palpant NJ. Human dignity in bioethics: from worldviews to the public square. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013. ISBN-13: 978-1138922198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gross D, Tolba RH. Ethics in animal-based research. Eur Surg Res. 2015;55:43–57.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000377721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiwani B. Clinical ethics consultation: a practical guide, SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Berlin: Springer; 2017. ISBN: 978-3-319-60376-6.Google Scholar
  5. Paulson S, Berlin HA, Miller CB, Shermer M. The moral animal: virtue, vice, and human nature. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1384:39–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pellegrino ED, Schulman A, Merrill TW, editors. Human dignity and bioethics. Indiana: Notre Dame Press; 2009. ISBN-13: 978-0268038922.Google Scholar
  7. Serna P, Seoane J-A. Bioethical decision making and argumentation. Berlin: Springer; 2016. ISBN-13: 978-3319434179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matjaž Zwitter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute of OncologyLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations