Advertisement

Brackishwater Aquaculture: Opportunities and Challenges for Meeting Livelihood Demand in Indian Sundarbans

  • T. K. GhoshalEmail author
  • Debasis De
  • G. Biswas
  • Prem Kumar
  • K. K. Vijayan
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 30)

Abstract

Brackishwater farming in India has been a traditional practice for centuries and confined mainly to the bheries (manmade impoundments in coastal wetlands) in Sundarbans, West Bengal, India. Scientific brackishwater aquaculture started in India with tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) farming initiated during early 1990s. With the introduction of Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) during 2009, Indian aquaculture industry has grown rapidly. In addition, certain marine/ brackishwater fish such as, seabass, mullets, milkfish and pearlspot have shown a lot of promise. Successful domestication of indigenous Indian white shrimp (Penaeus indicus) and experimental farming using hatchery–produced seed by ICAR–Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (CIBA) showed encouraging results. Besides domestic consumption, fishery products exported from the state were 1.05 million tons of value Indian rupee (INR) 33,4420 million during 2015–16. Indian Sundarbans located in the south–east end of West Bengal offers congenial environment for growth of variety of fishes and shrimps. Frozen shrimp and live crab are the main export items from brackishwater aquaculture in Sundarbans. As the economic benefit is greater, there is a tendency of Sundarbans dwellers to shift from fishing to aquaculture for better livelihood. There is vast scope for sustainable development of brackishwater aquaculture in Sundarbans to meet the livelihood demand utilizing the unused and underused areas and adopting advanced farming practices. Challenges faced by Sundarbans aquafarmers need to be tackled by appropriate management tools like social mobilization of aqua producers, technology assessment and refinement, participatory planning, and capacity building of key stakeholders.

Keywords

Sundarbans Brackishwater aquaculture Technology development Biosecurity measures Species diversification Sustainable development Livelihood Opportunities Challenges 

References

  1. Alagarswami K (1981) Prospects of coastal aquaculture in India. Proceedings seminar on role of small scale fisheries and coastal aquaculture in integrated rural development. 6–9 December 1978. Bulletin 30-A, CMFRI, MadrasGoogle Scholar
  2. Audelo-Naranjo JM, Martínez-Córdova LR, Voltolina D et al (2011) Water quality, production parameters and nutritional condition of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) grown intensively in zero water exchange mesocosms with artificial substrates. Aquac Res 42:1371–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas G, Thirunavukkarasu AR, Sundaray JK et al (2010) Optimization of feeding frequency of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) fry reared in net cages under brackishwater environment. Aquaculture 305:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas G, Thirunavukkarasu AR, Sundaray JK et al (2011a) Culture of Asian seabass Lates calcarifer (Bloch) in brackishwater tide-fed ponds: growth and condition factor based on length and weight under two feeding systems. Indian J Fish 58(2):53–57Google Scholar
  5. Biswas G, Sundaray JK, Thirunavukkarasu AR et al (2011b) Length- weight relationship and variation in condition of Chanos chanos (Forsskål, 1775) from tide-fed brackishwater ponds of the Sunderbans- India. Indian J Geo Marine Sci 40(3):386–390Google Scholar
  6. Biswas G, De D, Thirunavukkarasu AR et al (2012) Effects of stocking density, feeding, fertilization and combined fertilization-feeding on the performances of striped grey mullet (Mugil cephalus L.) fingerlings in brackishwater pond rearing systems. Aquaculture 338–341:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswas G, Ghoshal TK, Natarajan M et al (2013) Effects of stocking density and presence or absence of soil base on growth, weight variation, survival and body composition of pearlspot, Etroplus suratensis (Bloch) fingerlings. Aquac Res 44:1266–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas G, Sundaray JK, Ghoshal TK et al (2014) Tank based captive breeding and seed production of the pearlspot (Etroplus suratensis). Aquacult Asia 19(3):12–16Google Scholar
  9. Biswas G, Sundaray JK, Bhattacharyya SB et al (2017) Influence of feeding, periphyton and compost application on the performances of striped grey mullet (Mugil cephalus L.) fingerlings in fertilized brackishwater ponds. Aquaculture 481:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd CE (1998) Pond water aeration systems. Aquac Eng 18:9–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CAA (2009) Guidelines for regulating hatcheries and farms for introduction of Litopenaeus vannamei, Coastal Aquaculture Authority (Amendment) rules, p 14Google Scholar
  12. CAA (2012) Guidelines for seed production and culture of specific pathogen free Penaeus monodon. Coastal Aquaculture Authority (Amendment) rules, p 17Google Scholar
  13. Chanratchakool P, Turrbull JF, Limswan C (1994) Health management in shrimp ponds. Aquatic Animal Health Research Institute, Kaselsart University, Bangkok, pp 54–62Google Scholar
  14. CIBA (2000) Captive broodstock development induced breeding and larval stages of mud crabs (Scylla sp.). Bulletin no 12. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  15. CIBA (2004) Soil and water quality management in brackishwater aquaculture. CIBA Special Publication no 13. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  16. CIBA (2010a) Biosecure shrimp farming technology. CIBA Technology Series no 5. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  17. CIBA (2010b) Low input low cost shrimp farming system based on organic principles. CIBA Technology Series no 3. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  18. CIBA (2016) Application of minerals in shrimp culture systems. CIBA Extension Series no 52. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  19. De D, Biswas G, Ghoshal TK et al (2016) Low cost feed (Poly) for brackishwater polyculture. CIBA Technology Series 10. Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture (Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Google Scholar
  20. DoFWB (2016) Hand book of fisheries statistics. Department of Fisheries, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata, India, pp 2015–2016Google Scholar
  21. FAO (2014) National aquaculture sector overview India. http://www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/naso_india/en/. Accessed 07 June 2017
  22. FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture (2016) – contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, p 29Google Scholar
  23. Ghoshal TK, De D, Biswas G et al (2016) Development and dissemination of low-cost farm-made formulated feed for improved production efficiency in brackishwater polyculture. In: Miao W, Lal KK (eds) Sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region. Documentation of successful practices. FAO Regional Office, Bangkok, pp 62–70Google Scholar
  24. Govt. of India (2017) Basic animal husbandry and fisheries statistics. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, New Delhi, p 148Google Scholar
  25. Jayanthi M (2007) Engineering aspects of aqua farm design for sustainability of environment and aquaculture. Indian J Fish 54:59–65Google Scholar
  26. Khang PV, Corsin F, Mohan CV et al (2008) Limiting the impact of shrimp diseases through the implementation of better management practices: the Vietnamese experience. In: Bondad-Reantaso MG, Mohan CV, Crumlish M et al (eds) Diseases in Asian aquaculture VI. Fish Health Section, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, pp 433–440. p 505Google Scholar
  27. Khatoon H, Banerjee S, Yusoff F et al (2009) Evaluation of indigenous marine periphytic Amphora, Navicula and Cymbella grown on substrate as feed supplement in Penaeus monodon post larval hatchery system. Aquac Nutr 15:186–193Google Scholar
  28. Knowler D, Philcox N, Nathan S et al (2009) Assessing prospects for shrimp culture in the Indian Sundarbans: a combined simulation modelling and choice experiment approach. Mar Policy 33:613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar P, Arasu ART, Natarajan M et al (2012) Secondary stress responses in Grey Mullet (Mugil cephalus, Linnaeus) fry to increasing packing densities. Israeli J Aquacult Bamidgeh 64.2013.840:6Google Scholar
  30. Kumar P, Kailasam M, Mahalakshmi P et al (2016) Length-weight relationship, condition factor and cannibalism in Asian seabass Lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790) reared in nursery. Indian J Fish 63(3):131–134Google Scholar
  31. Kumar P, Kailasam M, Sethi SN et al (2017a) Effect of dietary L-tryptophan on cannibalism, growth and survival of Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790) fry. Indian J Fish 64(2):28–32Google Scholar
  32. Kumar P, Rajeshwaran T, Priya P et al (2017b) Comparative immunological and biochemical properties of the epidermal mucus from three brackishwater fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0923-3
  33. Kumaran M, Ravisankar T, Anand PR et al (2017) Knowledge level of shrimp farmers on better management practices (BMPs) of Penaeus vannamei farming: a comparative assessment of east and west coasts of India. Indian J Fish 64:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez-Porchas M, Martı’nez-Co’rdova LR, Porchas-Cornejo MA et al (2010) Shrimp polyculture: a potentially profitable, sustainable, but uncommon aquacultural practice. Rev Aquac 2:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mehta GS (2009) Inland fisheries development the way forward in West Bengal. Fish Chimes 29(7):49–59Google Scholar
  36. NFDB (2017) National Fisheries Development Board: about Indian fisheries. http://nfdb.gov.in/about-indian-fisheries.htm. Accessed 26 Sept 2017
  37. Panigrahi A, Sundaray JK, Ghoshal TK et al (2009) Bio-secure zero water exchange system technology of shrimp farming for better monitoring of the coastal ecosystem. J Coastal Agric Res 27(1):26–33Google Scholar
  38. Pradhan D, Flaherty M (2007) National initiatives, local effects: trade liberalization, shrimp aquaculture, and coastal communities in Orissa, India. Soc Nat Resour 21:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Primavera JH (1998) Tropical shrimp farming and its sustainability. In: de Silva S (ed) Tropical mariculture. Academic Press, London, pp 257–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Primavera JH (2006) Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean Coast Manag 49:531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramesh MR, Shankar KM, Mohan CV et al (1999) Comparison of three plant substrates for enhancing carp growth through bacterial biofilm. Aquac Eng 19:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramsundar B (2011) Sustainable use of water resources in the form of pisciculture to generate income in West Bengal – a study report. J Econ Sustain Dev 2:15–30Google Scholar
  43. Rosenberry B (1999) World shrimp farming 1999. Shrimp News International, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  44. Shiva V, Karir G (1997) Towards sustainable aquaculture. Research Foundation for Science, New Dehli, p 133Google Scholar
  45. Shyne Anand PS, Sujeet K, Panigrahi A et al (2013) Effects of C:N ratio and substrate integration on periphyton biomass, microbial dynamics and growth of Penaeus monodon juveniles. Aquac Int 21:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sujeet K, Shyne Anand PS, De D et al (2017) Effects of biofloc under different carbon sources and protein levels on water quality, growth performance and immune responses in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Fabricius, 1978). Aquac Res 48:1168–1182Google Scholar
  47. Suseelan C (1996) Crab culture and crab fattening. In: Artificial reefs and sea farming technologies. CMFRI Bull 48:99–102Google Scholar
  48. Thirunavukkarasu AR, Kailasam M, Kishore Chandra P et al (2001) Captive broodstock development and breeding of seabass Lates calcarifer (Bloch) in India. In: Menon NG, Pillai PP (eds) Perspectives in mariculture. The Marine Biological Association of India, Cochin, pp p111–p124Google Scholar
  49. Thirunavukkarasu AR, M Abraham, Kailasam M (2004) Hand book of seed production and culture of Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch). CIBA Bulletin 18, Chennai, p 51Google Scholar
  50. Thompson FL, Abreu PC, Wasielesky W (2002) Importance of biofilm for water quality and nourishment in intensive shrimp culture. Aquaculture 203:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Umesh NR, Chandra Mohan AB, Ravibabu G et al (2010) Shrimp farmers in India: empowering small-scale farmers through a cluster-based approach. In: De Silva SS, Davy FB (eds) Success stories in Asian aquaculture. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. K. Ghoshal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Debasis De
    • 2
  • G. Biswas
    • 1
  • Prem Kumar
    • 1
  • K. K. Vijayan
    • 2
  1. 1.ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Kakdwip Research CentreKakdwipIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater AquacultureChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations