Advertisement

Impacts of Energy Efficient Constant Output Heating on the Moisture Conditions of Unoccupied Summer Cottages in Finland

  • Juha VinhaEmail author
  • Jarkko Piironen
  • Mihkel Kiviste
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Finland has around half a million summer cottages. An increasing demand exist for using these cottages also in other seasons. The influence of constant output heating is studied for energy saving purposes while avoiding moisture damage in the cottages. The proposed type of heating requires only a fraction of amount of electrical energy in comparison with conventional heating. Field measurements, which are presented in current paper, aim at indicating the actual moisture conditions in unoccupied Finnish summer cottages. Field measurements in seven non-insulated massive log walled cottages in Tampere region (Finland) have been performed during 2007–2009. Based on the values of indoor and outdoor RH (at one-hour interval) the monthly average differences between indoor and outdoor water vapour content were determined. Prevailing conditions of moisture deficit were found in summer cottage case buildings during the measurement period. These results oppose to the usual conditions of moisture excess in Finnish residential buildings. Despite the difference in moisture conditions the envelope structures in summer cottages and in residential buildings are often similar.

Keywords

Field measurements Unoccupied summer cottage 

References

  1. 1.
    J. Piironen, J. Vinha, M. Kiviste, Modelling hygrothermal performance of roof and floor structures with an energy-efficient constant output heating. Energy Procedia 132, 694–699 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Burgett, A. Chini, P. Oppenheim, Specifying residential retrofit packages for 30% reductions in energy consumption in hot–humid climate zones. Energ. Effi. 6(3), 523–543 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.H.C.P. Mathews, D.C. Botha, A. Arndt, Malan.: HVAC control strategies to enhance comfort and minimise energy usage. Energy Build. 33(8), 853–863 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, J.F. Coronel, I.R. Maestre, A review of HVAC systems requirements in building energy regulations. Energy Build. 43, 255–268 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Meyers, E.D. Williams, H.S. Matthews, Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in homes. Energy Build. 42, 563–569 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.M. Ardehali, T.F. Smith, Evaluation of variable volume and temperature HVAC system for commercial and residential buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 37(9), 1469–1479 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Rytkönen, A. Kirkkari, Eco-Efficiency of Holiday Homes. The Finnish Environment 6/2010. Ministry of the Environment, Department of the Built Environment, Helsinki, 112 p. (in Finnish, 2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Piironen, J. Vinha, Constant Output Heating and its Effect on the Hygrothermal Performance of Log Summer Houses. Research report no. 150. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere. 79 p. + app. 16 p. (in Finnish, 2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations