Advertisement

Atrium in Residential Buildings—A Design to Enhance Social Interaction in Urban Areas in Nordic Climates

  • Itai DanielskiEmail author
  • Malin Krook
  • Kerstin Veimer
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

The design concept of conditioned atria receive growing popularity in both commercial and service buildings all over the world, but still not common in the residential sector. This study used a psychological framework to examine if building design with enclosed heated atria in apartment buildings can enhance sense of community and social interactions in Nordic climates. A qualitative study was conducted to understand the perception of residents living in apartment buildings with heated atrium. One of the few examples in Sweden. This was compared to the experience of residents in a “traditional” apartment building without an atrium. The questionnaire was comprised of six parts: (i) socio-demographic aspects; (ii) information about the apartment; (iii) social activities within the building; (iv) social interaction with neighbours; (v) information about principles in life; and (vi) sense of community linked to their homes. The results showed significant social differences between the residents of the atrium and “traditional” buildings, which could not be explained solely by differences in preferences and principles in life. A large proportion of the social differences between the buildings could be explained by the building design, as the common and semi-private areas within the atrium building provide opportunities to establish social interactions. The residents in the atrium building was found to have greater sense of community and higher frequency of interactions, which are both parts of social sustainability.

Keywords

Atrium Residential building Social interactions 

References

  1. 1.
    M.S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 1360–1380 (1973)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Wood, L.D. Frank, B. Giles-Corti, Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Soc. Sci. Med. 70(9), 1381–1390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Mehta, Look closely and you will see, listen carefully and you will hear: urban design and social interaction on streets. J. Urban Des. 14(1), 29–64 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.B. Brown, J.R. Burton, A.L. Sweaney, Neighbors, households, and Front Porches: new urbanist community tool or mere nostalgia? Environ. Behav. 30(5), 579–600 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Gehl, ‘Soft edges’ in residential streets. Scand. Hous. Plann. Res. 3(2), 89–102 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.C. Marcus, W. Sarkissian, Housing as if People Mattered. Site Design for Medium Density Family Housing (University of California Press, 1992) 280 pagesGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Danielski et al., Heated atrium in multi-storey apartment buildings, a design with potential to enhance energy efficiency and to facilitate social interactions. Build. Environ. 106, 352–364 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.D. Perkins, D.A. Long, in Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. Psychological Sense of Community (Springer, 2002) pp. 291–318Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.W. McMillan, D.M. Chavis, Sense of community: a definition and theory. J. Commun. Psychol. 14(1), 6–23 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.A. Peterson, P.W. Speer, D.W. McMillan, Validation of a brief sense of community scale: confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. J. Commun. Psychol. 36(1), 61–73 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.H. Schwartz, Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25, 1–65 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Hansla et al., The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. J. Environ. Psychol. 28(1), 1–9 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.M. Chavis, A. Wandersman, Sense of community in the urban environment: a catalyst for participation and community development. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 18(1), 55–81 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mid-Sweden UniversityÖstersundSweden

Personalised recommendations