Advertisement

Inverse Model Identification of the Thermal Dynamics of a Norwegian Zero Emission House

  • Pierre J. C. Vogler-FinckEmail author
  • John Clauß
  • Laurent Georges
  • Igor Sartori
  • Rafael Wisniewski
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Dynamical model identification is an essential element in the implementation of a model predictive controller. In this work, a control-oriented first order model was identified in a dedicated experiment on a super-insulated single-family house. First, parameters resulting from CTSM and the MATLAB System Identification toolbox were compared. Then, a comparison of model predictions and measurements showed that this simple model captures well the main dynamics of the building-averaged indoor temperature, after one week of training on rich data with sample time below 15 min. It was also observed that this prediction performance was not affected by the configuration of internal doors.

Keywords

Zero emission building Dynamical thermal model identification Control-oriented building modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge valuable input from Eirik Selvnes, Stein Kristian Skånøy, Martin Thalfeldt, Peng Liu, Francesco Goia (NTNU), Maria Justo-Alonso (SINTEF), Glenn Reynders (KU Leuven), Peder Bacher (DTU Compute), and the 2 anonymous reviewers. Access to the LivingLab was provided and funded by the Research Centre on Zero Emission Buildings project (and its successor: the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities), while the main author’s work was part of the ADVANTAGE project funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 607774. This work was initiated as part of a collaboration within the IEA EBC Annex 67 “Energy Flexible Buildings”.1

References

  1. 1.
    A. Afram, F. Janabi-Sharifi, Theory and applications of HVAC control systems—A review of model predictive control. Build. Environ. 72, 343–355 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clauß J, et al.. Control strategies for building energy systems to unlock demand side flexibility—A review. Building Simulation Conference 2017, San Francisco: 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ljung L. System identification: theory for the user. 2nd ed. (1999) Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. Li, J. Wen, Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 517–537 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Atam, L. Helsen, Control-oriented thermal modeling of multizone buildings: methods and issues. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 36–3, 87–111 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Madsen H. Time series analysis. (2008) Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Prívara et al., Building modeling as a crucial part for building predictive control. Energy Build. 56, 8–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Salque, D. Marchio, P. Riederer, Neural predictive control for single-speed ground source heat pumps connected to a floor heating system for typical French dwelling. Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 35, 182–197 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Bacher, H. Madsen, Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings. Energy Build. 43, 1511–1522 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Reynders, J. Diriken, D. Saelens, Quality of grey-box models and identified parameters as function of the accuracy of input and observation signals. Energy Build. 82, 263–274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Madsen, et al. Thermal performance characterization using time series data; IEA EBC Annex 58 Guidelines 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CTSM-R Development Team. Continuous Time Stochastic Modelling in R, User’s Guide and Reference Manual. 2015, http://www.ctsm.info/
  13. 13.
    Ljung L. MATLAB System Identification Toolbox TM—Getting Started Guide R2016b (Version 9.5). 2016Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.G. Hestnes, N.L. Eik-nes (eds.), Zero emission buildings (Bergen, Fagbokforlaget, 2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goia F, Finocchiaro L, Gustavsen A. The ZEB Living Laboratory at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology : a zero emission house for engineering and social science experiments. 7 . Passivhus Norden | Sustainable Cities and Buildings, Copenhagen: 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Vogler-Finck, J. Clauß, L. Georges, A dataset to support dynamical modelling of the thermal dynamics of a super-insulated building. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1034819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Clauß, P. Vogler-Finck, L. Georges, Calibration of a high-resolution dynamic model for detailed investigation of the energy flexibility of a zero emission residential building (Cold Climate HVAC, Kiruna, 2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neogrid Technologies ApSAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  3. 3.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.SINTEFOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations